Advertisement

Correction to: The Effectiveness of Resisted Sled Training (RST) for Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Correction
  • 108 Downloads

1 Correction to: Sports Medicine  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0947-8

Page 1: Abstract, Conclusions, sentence 4. The following sentence, which read:

Moreover, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per week, with a training frequency of two to three times per week, for at least 6 weeks.

should read:

Moreover, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per total training program, with a training frequency of two to three times per week, for at least 6 weeks.

Page 6: Section 3.3, paragraph 3, sentence 2. The following sentence, which read:

A large ES was obtained for a frequency over twice a week (ES 1.85) [55], and moderate ESs were found for lower loads (ES 0.61) [39, 55–57, 59–65], > 6-week training periods (ES 0.63) [39, 55, 56, 60, 63–66], session volume > 160 m (ES 0.92) [55, 56, 59, 60, 64], total weekly training volume > 2680 m (ES 0.83) [55, 59, 60, 64], and rigid surface (ES 0.69) [39, 56, 61, 64].

should read:

A large ES was obtained for a frequency over twice a week (ES 1.85) [55], and moderate ESs were found for lower loads (ES 0.61) [39, 55–57, 59–65], > 6-week training periods (ES 0.63) [39, 55, 56, 60, 63–66], session volume > 160 m (ES 0.92) [55, 56, 59, 60, 64], total training volume > 2680 m (ES 0.83) [55, 59, 60, 64], and rigid surface (ES 0.69) [39, 56, 61, 64].

Page 6: Section 3.3, paragraph 3, sentence 3. The following sentence, which read:

Small ESs were also found for a training frequency equal to or fewer than two trainings per week (ES 0.52) [39, 56, 57, 59–66], a total weekly training volume < 2680 m (ES 0.53) [39, 56, 57, 61–63, 65, 66], and grass surface (ES 0.47) [59, 60, 65, 66].

should read:

Small ESs were also found for a training frequency equal to or fewer than two trainings per week (ES 0.52) [39, 56, 57, 59–66], a total training volume < 2680 m (ES 0.53) [39, 56, 57, 61–63, 65, 66], and grass surface (ES 0.47) [59, 60, 65, 66].

Page 19: Section 4.1, paragraph 7, sentence 1. The following sentence, which read:

Another variable that should be considered when designing training programs with RST is volume, both for each session and for the microcycle.

should read:

Another variable that should be considered when designing training programs with RST is volume, both for each session and for the training cycle (i.e. mesocycle).

Page 19: Section 4.1, paragraph 7, sentence 4. The following sentence, which read:

Similarly, when weekly volumes were compared, higher volumes (> 2680 m) produced a moderate effect (ES 0.83) compared with volumes 720–2680 m (ES 0.53), although the effects were statistically significant for both volume per session and weekly volume.

should read:

Similarly, when total training volumes were compared, higher volumes (> 2680 m) produced a moderate effect (ES 0.83) compared with volumes 720–2680 m (ES 0.53), although the effects were statistically significant for both volume per session and total training volume.

Page 20: Section 4.2, paragraph 2, final sentence. The following sentence, which read:

With respect to the training characteristics, the effect was small in all cases and significant with loads < 20% BM (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), weekly training frequencies of ≤ 2 days (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), for duration > 6 weeks (ES 0.39; p = 0.01), volumes per session > 160 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03), and weekly values > 2680 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03).

should read:

With respect to the training characteristics, the effect was small in all cases and significant with loads < 20% BM (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), weekly training frequencies of ≤ 2 days (ES 0.35; p = 0.02), for duration > 6 weeks (ES 0.39; p = 0.01), volumes per session > 160 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03), and total training values > 2680 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03).

Page 21: Section 5, paragraph 1, sentence 7. The following sentence, which read:

Finally, with regards to the training characteristics, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per week, with a training frequency of 2–3 times per week, for at least 6 weeks.

should read:

Finally, with regards to the training characteristics, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per total training program, with a training frequency of 2–3 times per week, for at least 6 weeks.

The ​original ​article ​has ​been ​corrected.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCAM Research Center for High Performance SportCatholic University of MurciaMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Sport Sciences, UCAMCatholic University of MurciaMurciaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations