Sports Medicine

, Volume 48, Issue 11, pp 2671–2673 | Cite as

Comment on: “Endurance Performance is Influenced by Perceptions of Pain and Temperature: Theory, Applications and Safety Considerations”

  • Phillip J. Wallace
  • Brandon J. McKinlay
  • Stephen S. CheungEmail author
Letter to the Editor

We commend Stevens et al. [1] on an excellent systematic review on the interconnections of perceptions of pain, thermal perceptions of sensation and comfort and how these factors affect endurance performance. Additionally, the combination of interventions including those that alter the perceptual state (e.g., menthol, transcranial magnetic stimulation) or mental state (e.g., psychological skills training) help connect the applicability and necessary future directions for this area of research and use in athletic settings. Future endurance and thermal experiments should consider including measures of perceptions to determine their role in performance. We are writing this letter to provide additional insights from one of our studies that may complement the findings discussed in your review, as it may help to determine the interconnection between perceptions and their role in exercise performance in the heat [2]. This study was approved by the Biosciences Research Ethics Board at Brock...


Compliance with Ethical Standards


No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.

Conflict of interest

Phillip Wallace, Brandon McKinlay and Stephen Cheung declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this letter.


  1. 1.
    Stevens CJ, Mauger AR, Hassmèn P, Taylor L. Endurance performance is influenced by perceptions of pain and temperature: theory, applications and safety considerations. Sports Med. 2018;48:525–37.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheung SS. Interconnections between thermal perception and exercise capacity in the heat: thermal perception and exercise capacity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20:53–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallace PJ, McKinlay BJ, Coletta NA, Vlaar JI, Taber MJ, Wilson PM, et al. Effects of motivational self-talk on endurance and cognitive performance in the heat. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:191–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nybo L, Nielsen B. Perceived exertion is associated with an altered brain activity during exercise with progressive hyperthermia. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:2017–23.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nielsen B, Hyldig T, Bidstrup F, González-Alonso J, Christoffersen GRJ. Brain activity and fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heat. Pflüg Arch. 2001;442:41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Périard JD, De Pauw K, Zanow F, Racinais S. Cerebrocortical activity during self-paced exercise in temperate, hot and hypoxic conditions. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2018. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roelands B, Hasegawa H, Watson P, Piacentini MF, Buyse L, De Schutter G, et al. The effects of acute dopamine reuptake inhibition on performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:879–85.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip J. Wallace
    • 1
  • Brandon J. McKinlay
    • 1
  • Stephen S. Cheung
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Environmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of KinesiologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations