Advertisement

Pediatric Drugs

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 483–495 | Cite as

A Population-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Approach to Pantoprazole Dosing for Obese Children and Adolescents

  • Valentina Shakhnovich
  • P. Brian Smith
  • Jeffrey T. Guptill
  • Laura P. James
  • David N. Collier
  • Huali Wu
  • Chad E. Livingston
  • Jian Zhao
  • Gregory L. Kearns
  • Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
  • On behalf of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background and Aims

Pharmacokinetic data for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acid-suppression drugs commonly prescribed to children, are lacking for obese children who are at greatest risk for acid-related disease. In a recent multi-center investigation, we demonstrated decreased, total body weight adjusted, apparent clearance (CL/F) of the PPI pantoprazole for obese children compared with their non-obese peers. Subsequently, we developed a population-based pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to characterize pantoprazole disposition and evaluated appropriate pantoprazole dosing strategies for obese pediatric patients, using simulation.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic data from the only prospective study of PPIs in obese children (aged 6–17 years; n = 40) included 273 pantoprazole and 256 pantoprazole-sulfone plasma concentrations, after single oral-dose administration, and were used for pantoprazole model development and covariate analysis (NONMEM®). Model evaluation was performed via bootstrapping and predictive checks, and the final model was applied to simulate systemic pantoprazole exposures for common dosing scenarios.

Results

A two-compartment PopPK model, which included CYP2C19 genotype and total body weight, provided the best fit. Resultant, typical, weight-normalized pantoprazole parameter estimates were different than previously reported for children or adults, with significantly reduced pantoprazole CL/F for obese children. Of the dosing scenarios evaluated, the weight-tiered approach, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, achieved pantoprazole exposures [area under the curve (AUC0–∞)] within ranges previously reported as therapeutic, without over- or under-prediction for obese children.

Conclusions

Our data argue against empiric dose escalation of PPIs for obese children and support current FDA-approved pediatric weight-tiered dosing for pantoprazole; however, 3- to 5-fold inter-individual variability in pantoprazole AUC0–∞ remained using this dosing approach.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Pediatric Trials Network (PTN) Members

The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–PTN Steering Committee

Daniel K. Benjamin Jr., MD, PhD, Katherine Y. Berezny, BSMT, MPH, P., Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, MD, PhD, Brian Smith, MD, MPH, MHS Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; Gregory L. Kearns, PharmD, PhD, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR; Matthew M. Laughon, MD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Ian M. Paul, MD, MSc, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Michael J. Smith, MD, MSCE,  University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; John van den Anker, MD, PhD, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health, Washington, DC; Kelly Wade, MD, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

David Siegel, MD, Perdita Taylor-Zapata, MD, Anne Zajicek, PharmD, Zhaoxia Ren, MD, PhD, Ekaterini Tsilou, MD, Alice Pagan, BBA.

The EMMES Corporation (Data Coordinating Center)

Ravinder Anand, PhD, Traci Clemons, PhD, Gina Simone, BS.

PTN Study Team Investigators and Study Coordinators

Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR (enrolled 13 subjects): Laura P. James, MD (Principal Investigator, PI), Lee Howard, RN, CCRC (Site Coordinator, SC); The Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO (enrolled 23 subjects): Valentina Shakhnovich, MD (PI), Jaylene Weigel, RN, MSN, MBA-HCM,CPN, CCRC (SC); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (enrolled 5 subjects): David N. Collier, MD, PhD, FAAP (PI), Nancy Darden-Saad, BS, RN, CCRC (SC).

Author contribution

The study sponsor was consulted concerning study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

All phases of this study were supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201000003I), Pediatric Trials Network (NICHD-2012-PAN01).

Conflict of interest

VS. receives research support from the NASPGHAN Foundation for the investigation of PPIs in children. As an associate editor, V.S. receives honoraria from the journal Clinical and Translational Science. M.C.W. receives support for research from the National Institutes of Health (1R01-HD076676-01A1), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (HHSN272201500006I and HHSN272201300017I), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201000003I), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHSO100201300009C). The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Supplementary material

40272_2018_305_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 52 kb)
40272_2018_305_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (15 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 15 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chai G, Governale L, McMahon AW, Trinidad JP, Staffa J, Murphy D. Trends of outpatient prescription drug utilization in US. Children. 2012;2002–2010(130):23–31.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:806–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koebnick C, Getahun D, Smith N, Porter AH, Der-Sarkissian JK, Jacobsen SJ. Extreme childhood obesity is associated with increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease in a large population-based study. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:e267–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbons TE, Gold BD. The use of proton pump inhibitors in children: a comprehensive review. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5:25–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheymol G. Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics: implications for drug therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39:215–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brill MJE, Diepstraten J, van Rongen A, van Kralingen S, van den Anker JN, Knibbe CA. Impact of obesity on drug meatabolism and elimination in adults and children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:277–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harskamp-van Ginkel MW, Hill KD, Becker KC, Testoni D, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Gonzalez D, et al. Drug dosing and pharmacokinetics in children with obesity: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:678–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knibbe CA, Brill MJ, van Rongen A, Diepstraten J, van der Graaf PH, Danhof M. Drug disposition in obesity: toward evidence-based dosing. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:149–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shakhnovich V, Smith PB, Guptill JT, James LP, Collier DN, Wu H, et al. Obese children require lower doses of pantoprazole than nonobese peers to achieve equal systemic drug exposures. J Pediatr. 2018;193(102–8):e1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowe S, Siegel D, Benjamin DK Jr. Gaps in drug dosing for obese children: a systematic review of commonly prescribed emergency care medications. Clin Ther. 2015;37:1924–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kendrick JG, Carr RR, Ensom MH. Pediatric obesity: pharmacokinetics and implications for drug dosing. Clin Ther. 2015;37:1897–923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dubcenco E, Beers-Block PM, Kim L, Schotland P, Levine JG, McCloskey CA, et al. A proton pump inhibitor in the reformulation setting: bioequivalence and potential implications for long-term safety. Clin Transl Sci. 2017;10:387–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Janmahasatian S, Duffull SB, Ash S, Ward LC, Byrne NM, Green B. Quantification of lean bodyweight. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44:1051–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keizer RJ, van Benten M, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH, Huitema AD. Piraña and PCluster: a modeling environment and cluster infrastructure for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011;101:72–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindbom L, Ribbing J, Jonsson EN. Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN)—a Perl module for NONMEM related programming. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;75:85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Xpose—an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1999;58:51–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Savic RM, Jonker DM, Kerbusch T, Karlsson MO. Implementation of a transit compartment model for describing drug absorption in pharmacokinetic studies. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007;34:711–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rousseau A, Léger F, Le Meur Y, Saint-Marcoux F, Paintaud G, Buchler M, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of oral cyclosporin using NONMEM: comparison of absorption pharmacokinetic models and design of a Bayesian estimator. Ther Drug Monit. 2004;26:23–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desai A, Schmitt-Hoffmann AH, Mujais S, Townsend R. Population pharmacokinetics of isavuconazole in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:3025–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Wart SA, Shoaf SE, Mallikaarjun S, Mager DE. Population-based meta-analysis of hydrochlorothiazide pharmacokinetics. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2013;34:527–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keizer RJ, Jansen RS, Rosing H, Thijssen B, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH, et al. Incorporation of concentration data below the limit of quantification in population pharmacokinetic analyses. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015;3:e00131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28:481–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holford N, Heo YA, Anderson B. A pharmacokinetic standard for babies and adults. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:2941–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hallynck TH, Soep HH, Thomis JA, Boelaert J, Daneels R, Dettli L. Should clearance be normalised to body surface or to lean body mass? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;11:523–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peters AM, Snelling HL, Glass DM, Bird NJ. Estimation of lean body mass in children. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:719–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allegaert K, Olkkola KT, Owens KH, Van de Velde M, de Maat MM, Anderson BJ. Covariates of intravenous paracetamol pharmacokinetics in adults. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderson BJ, Holford NH. Mechanistic basis of using body size and maturation to predict clearance in humans. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24:25–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Al-Sallami HS, Goulding A, Grant A, Taylor R, Holford N, Duffull SB. Prediction of fat-free mass in children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:1169–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Habtemariam B, Sallas W, Sunkara G, Kern S, Jarugula V, Pillai G. Population pharmacokinetics of valsartan in pediatrics. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24:145–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cortinez LI, Anderson BJ, Holford NH, Puga V, de la Fuente N, Auad H, et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics in the obese. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71:1501–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang DD, Zhang S. Standardized visual predictive check versus visual predictive check for model evaluation. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52:39–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cohen S, Bueno de Mesquita M, Mimouni FB. Adverse effects reported in the use of gastroesophageal reflux disease treatments in children: a 10 years literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80:200–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ward RM, Kearns GL, Tammara B, Bishop P, O’Gorman MA, James LP, et al. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, pharmacokinetics and safety study of pantoprazole tablets in children and adolescents aged 6 through 16 years with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:876–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    PROTONIX® (pantoprazole sodium) delayed-release tablets and PROTONIX® (pantoprazole sodium) for delayed-release oral suspension (U.S. package insert). Collegeville, Pa: Wyeth; 2009. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/022020s011-020987s049lbl.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2018.
  35. 35.
    Sampson MR, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Benjamin D Jr, Capparelli E, Watt K. Pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials in obese children. GaBi J. 2013;2:76–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Review(s). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2000/20987_Protonix_biopharmr_P2.pdf. Accessed 21 Sep 2017.
  37. 37.
    Kearns GL, Blumer J, Schexnayder S, James LP, Adcock KG, Reed MD, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous pantoprazole in children and adolescents. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;48:1356–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Knebel W, Tammara B, Udata C, Comer G, Gastonguay MR, Meng X. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of pantoprazole in pediatric patients from birth to 16 years. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:333–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tanaka M, Ohkubo T, Otani K, Suzuki A, Kaneko S, Sugawara K, et al. Metabolic disposition of pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, in relation to S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation phenotype and genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;62:619–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen WY, Chang WL, Tsai YC, Cheng HC, Lu CC, Sheu BS. Double-dosed pantoprazole accelerates the sustained symptomatic response in overweight and obese patients with reflux esophagitis in Los Angeles grades A and B. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1046–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: childhood overweight and obesity. Available at: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood. Accessed 16 Aug 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Shakhnovich
    • 1
    • 6
  • P. Brian Smith
    • 2
  • Jeffrey T. Guptill
    • 2
  • Laura P. James
    • 3
  • David N. Collier
    • 4
  • Huali Wu
    • 2
  • Chad E. Livingston
    • 2
  • Jian Zhao
    • 5
  • Gregory L. Kearns
    • 3
  • Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
    • 2
  • On behalf of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network
    • 4
  1. 1.The Children’s Mercy HospitalKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Duke Clinical Research InstituteDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Arkansas Children’s HospitalLittle RockUSA
  4. 4.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  5. 5.The Emmes CorporationRockvilleUSA
  6. 6.University of Missouri-Kansas City School of MedicineKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations