Advertisement

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Related Hospital Admissions in Geriatric Patients: A Comparative Analysis between the STOPP and START Criteria Versions 1 and 2

  • Stefanie ThevelinEmail author
  • Leïla El Mounaouar
  • Sophie Marien
  • Benoit Boland
  • Séverine Henrard
  • Olivia Dalleur
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Older persons are at significant risk of drug-related admissions (DRAs). We previously demonstrated that 27% of hospitalizations in geriatric patients were associated with potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) and/or potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) identified by the Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria version 1 (v1). The updated STOPP/START criteria version 2 (v2) comprised a 31% increase in prescribing criteria.

Objective

As a secondary analysis of our study conducted in 2008, we aimed to compare the prevalence and types of DRAs identified by STOPP/START.v1 and STOPP/START.v2.

Methods

We applied the STOPP/START.v2 criteria to a subset of 100 consecutively admitted geriatric patients selected from our original cross-sectional study of 302 patients. A geriatrician and a pharmacist adjudicated whether the identified PIMs and PPOs were related to acute hospitalization. Admissions were defined as DRAs if the identified PIM(s) and/or PPO(s) were related to the main cause of admission or played a significant contributory role in the admission.

Results

The median patient age was 83 years and the median number of medications at home was 8. Compared with STOPP/START.v1, STOPP/START.v2 not only yielded more instances of inappropriate prescribing but also targeted significantly more PIMs and PPOs associated with preventable DRAs (23% vs. 40% of all admissions, p < 0.001). PIMs of fall-risk-increasing drugs, and PPOs of musculoskeletal and cardiovascular system drugs, were most frequently associated with DRAs.

Conclusion

The latter instances of inappropriate prescribing with major clinical relevance warrant particular attention during medication review in older persons.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Adeline Gaillet and Alexandra Le Brun for their assistance with data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

Stefanie Thevelin, Leïla El Mounaouar, Sophie Marien, Benoit Boland, Séverine Henrard, and Olivia Dalleur have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Supplementary material

40266_2018_635_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (432 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 432 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Parameswaran Nair N, Chalmers L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki BJ, Castelino RL, Bereznicki LR. Hospitalization in older patients due to adverse drug reactions: the need for a prediction tool. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    El Morabet N, Uitvlugt EB, van den Bemt BJF, van den Bemt P, Janssen MJA, Karapinar-Carkit F. Prevalence and preventability of drug-related hospital readmissions: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(3):602–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ernst FR, Grizzle AJ. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: updating the cost-of-illness model. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001;41(2):192–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leendertse AJ, Van Den Bemt PM, Poolman JB, Stoker LJ, Egberts AC, Postma MJ. Preventable hospital admissions related to medication (HARM): cost analysis of the HARM study. Value Health. 2011;14(1):34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leendertse AJ, Egberts AC, Stoker LJ, van den Bemt PM. Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(17):1890–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Runciman WB, Roughead EE, Semple SJ, Adams RJ. Adverse drug events and medication errors in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(Suppl 1):i49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franceschi M, Scarcelli C, Niro V, Seripa D, Pazienza AM, Pepe G, et al. Prevalence, clinical features and avoidability of adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to a geriatric unit: a prospective study of 1756 patients. Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalleur O, Spinewine A, Henrard S, Losseau C, Speybroeck N, Boland B. Inappropriate prescribing and related hospital admissions in frail older persons according to the STOPP and START criteria. Drugs Aging. 2012;29(10):829–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamilton H, Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, O’Mahony D. Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria and the risk of adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(11):1013–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van der Stelt CA, Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel AM, Egberts AC, van den Bemt PM, Leendertse AJ, Hermens WA, et al. The association between potentially inappropriate prescribing and medication-related hospital admissions in older patients: a nested case control study. Drug Saf. 2016;39(1):79–87.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37(6):673–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane KL, Swine C, et al. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007;370(9582):173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boland B, Guignard B, Dalleur O, Lang P-O. Application of STOPP/START and Beers criteria: compared analysis on identification and relevance of potentially inappropriate prescriptions. Eur Geriatr Med. 2016;7(5):416–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blanco-Reina E, Garcia-Merino MR, Ocana-Riola R, Aguilar-Cano L, Valdellos J, Bellido-Estevez I, et al. Assessing potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older patients using the updated version of STOPP-START criteria: a comparison of profiles and prevalences with respect to the original version. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Belzile E, Verdon J. Prediction of hospital utilization among elderly patients during the 6 months after an emergency department visit. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(5):438–45.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deschodt M, Braes T, Broos P, Sermon A, Boonen S, Flamaing J, et al. Effect of an inpatient geriatric consultation team on functional outcome, mortality, institutionalization, and readmission rate in older adults with hip fracture: a controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(7):1299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hallas J, Harvald B, Gram LF, Grodum E, Brosen K, Haghfelt T, et al. Drug related hospital admissions: the role of definitions and intensity of data collection, and the possibility of prevention. J Intern Med. 1990;228(2):83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Counter D, Millar JWT, McLay JS. Hospital readmissions, mortality and potentially inappropriate prescribing: a retrospective study of older adults discharged from hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(8):1757–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wauters M, Elseviers M, Vaes B, Degryse J, Dalleur O, Vander Stichele R, et al. Too many, too few, or too unsafe? Impact of inappropriate prescribing on mortality, and hospitalization in a cohort of community-dwelling oldest old. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(5):1382–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lang PO, Petrovic M, Dalleur O, Ferahta M, Benetos A, Boland B. The exercise in applying STOPP/START.v2 in vulnerable very old patients: Towards patient tailored prescribing. Eur Geriatr Med. 2016;7(2):176–9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holmes HM, Hayley DC, Alexander GC, Sachs GA. Reconsidering medication appropriateness for patients late in life. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(6):605–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fischhoff B. Hindsight not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. 1975. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(4):304–11 (discussion 11–2).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thevelin S, Spinewine A, Beuscart JB, Boland B, Marien S, Vaillant F, et al. Development of a standardized chart review method to identify drug-related hospital admissions in older people. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(11):2600–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Phansalkar S, Hoffman JM, Nebeker JR, Hurdle JF. Pharmacists versus nonpharmacists in adverse drug event detection: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(8):842–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Doormaal JE, Mol PG, van den Bemt PM, Zaal RJ, Egberts AC, Kosterink JG, et al. Reliability of the assessment of preventable adverse drug events in daily clinical practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(7):645–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research InstituteUniversité catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Medical SchoolUniversité catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Geriatric Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-LucUniversité catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Institute of Health and Society (IRSS)Université catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.Pharmacy Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-LucUniversité catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations