Safety and Tolerability of Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K) Inhibitors in Oncology
Activation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and downstream signalling by AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) modulates cellular processes such as increased cell growth, cell proliferation and increased cell migration as well as deregulated apoptosis and oncogenesis. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (particularly Class I PI3K isoforms) is frequently activated in a variety of solid tumours and haematological malignancies, making PI3K an attractive therapeutic target in oncology. Inhibitors of PI3K also have the potential to restore sensitivity to other modalities of treatments when administered as part of combination regimens. Although many PI3K inhibitors have reached different stages of clinical development, only two (idelalisib and copanlisib) have been currently approved for use in the treatment of B cell lymphoma and leukaemias. While these two agents are effective clinically, their use is associated with a number of serious class-related as well as drug-specific adverse effects. Some of these are immune-mediated and include cutaneous reactions, severe diarrhoea with or without colitis, hepatotoxicity and pneumonitis. They also induce various metabolic abnormalities such as hyperglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia. Not surprisingly, therefore, many new PI3K inhibitors with a varying degree of target selectivity have been synthesised in expectations of improved safety and efficacy, and are currently under clinical investigations for use in a variety of solid tumours as well as haematological malignancies. However, evidence from early clinical trials, reviewed herein, suggests that these newer agents are also associated not only with class-related but also other serious and unexpected adverse effects. Their risk/benefit evaluations have resulted in a number of them being discontinued from further development. Cumulative experience with the use of PI3K inhibitors under development suggests that, compared with their use as monotherapy, combining them with other anticancer therapies may be a more effective strategy in improving current standard-of-care and clinical outcomes in cancers beyond haematological cancers. For example, combination of alpelisib with fulvestrant has recently demonstrated unexpectedly superior efficacy compared to fulvestrant alone. Furthermore, the immunomodulatory activity of PI3Kδ and PI3Kγ inhibitors also provides unexpected opportunities for their use in cancer immunotherapy, as is currently being tested in several clinical trials.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This is a review of data in the public domain and the authors declare compliance with all ethical standards.
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review.
Conflict of Interest
Rashmi Shah (RS) was formerly a Senior Clinical Assessor at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK, and now provides expert consultancy services to a number of pharmaceutical companies. Giuseppe Curigliano (GC) has received consulting fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Roche; travel support from Roche; and lecture payments from Pfizer. RS and GC have no other conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.
Contributions for Authorship
GC and RS conceived the topic and RS assisted with literature search. RS prepared the first draft and GC revised the first and subsequent drafts. Both GC and RS approved the final version.
- 4.Yip PY. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-Akt-mTOR) signaling pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4:165–76.Google Scholar
- 12.Greenwell IB, Ip A, Cohen JB. PI3K inhibitors: understanding toxicity mechanisms and management. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017;31:821–8.Google Scholar
- 34.Liu Y, Wan WZ, Li Y, Zhou GL, Liu XG. Recent development of ATP-competitive small molecule phosphatidylinostitol-3-kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Oncotarget. 2017;8:7181–200.Google Scholar
- 36.Food and Drug Administration. Drug-specific reviews on Drugs@FDA; 2018. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm.
- 37.European Medicines Agency. Drug-specific assessment reports and labels; 2018. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/landing/epar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124.
- 52.O’Brien S, Hillmen P, Coutre S, Barr PM, Fraser G, Tedeschi A, et al. Safety analysis of four randomized controlled studies of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018;18(10):648.e15–657.e15.Google Scholar
- 53.O’Brien SM, Furman RR, Coutre SE, Flinn IW, Burger J, Blum K, et al. Five-year experience with single-agent ibrutinib in patients with previously untreated and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic leukemia [abstract]. Presented at: 58th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting; San Diego, CA; December 3–6, 2016. Blood. 2016;128:233.Google Scholar
- 56.Zelenetz AD, Barrientos JC, Brown JR, Coiffier B, Delgado J, Egyed M, et al. Idelalisib or placebo in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: interim results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Food and Drug Administration. FDA alerts healthcare professionals about clinical trials with Zydelig (idelalisib) in combination with other cancer medicines. 14 Mar 2016; 2018. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm490618.htm.
- 58.Food and Drug Administration. Zydelig® risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (modified on 26 January 2018); 2018. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/rems/Zydelig_2018_03_22_REMS_Full.pdf.
- 62.Health Canada. Summary safety review—ZYDELIG (idelalisib)—assessing the potential risk of a rare brain infection (progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy). 15 Dec 2017; 2017. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada/safety-reviews/zydelig-assessing-potential-risk-rare-brain-infection.html.
- 70.Bowles DW, Kochenderfer M, Cohn A, Sideris L, Nguyen N, Cline-Burkhardt V, et al. A randomized, phase II trial of cetuximab with or without PX-866, an irreversible oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(337–44):e2.Google Scholar
- 79.Powles T, Lackner MR, Oudard S, Escudier B, Ralph C, Brown JE, et al. Randomized open-label phase II trial of apitolisib (GDC-0980), a novel inhibitor of the PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, versus everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1660–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 80.Wicki A, Brown N, Xyrafas A, Bize V, Hawle H, Berardi S, et al. First-in human, phase 1, dose-escalation pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral dual PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor PQR309 in patients with advanced solid tumors (SAKK 67/13). Eur J Cancer. 2018;96:6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 82.Seront E, Rottey S, Filleul B, Glorieux P, Goeminne JC, Verschaeve V, et al. Phase II study of dual phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2016;118:408–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 86.Papadopoulos KP, Tabernero J, Markman B, Patnaik A, Tolcher AW, Baselga J, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of SAR245409 (XL765), a novel, orally administered PI3K/mTOR inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2445–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 87.Wen PY, Omuro A, Ahluwalia MS, Fathallah-Shaykh HM, Mohile N, Lager JJ, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib (SAR245409, XL765) plus temozolomide with or without radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17:1275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 89.Brown KK, Toker A. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway and therapy resistance in cancer. F1000Prime Rep. 2015;7:13.Google Scholar
- 97.Andre F, Kaufman B, Juric D, Ciruelos EM, Iwata H, Mayer IA, et al. SOLAR-1: a phase III study of alpelisib and fulvestrant in men and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (BC) progressing on or after aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy [abstract no. OT2-01-04]. Cancer Res. 2017;77(4 Suppl):OT2-01-04. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS16-OT2-01-04.
- 100.Baselga J, Dent SF, Cortés J, Im Y-H, Diéras V, Harbeck N, et al. Phase III study of taselisib (GDC-0032) + fulvestrant (FULV) v FULV in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, PIK3CA-mutant (MUT), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): primary analysis from SANDPIPER [abstract no. LBA1006]. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl):LBA1006.Google Scholar
- 101.Carroll J. Roche dumps its PhIII PI3K effort on taselisib after researchers track poor survival edge, harsh side effects for breast cancer. Chicago, 3 Jun 2018; 2018. https://endpts.com/roche-dumps-its-phiii-pi3k-effort-on-taselisib-after-researchers-track-poor-survival-edge-harsh-side-effects-for-breast-cancer/.
- 104.Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Cowey CL, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(11):1480–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 106.Lim EL, Cugliandolo FM, Rosner DR, Gyori D, Roychoudhuri R, Okkenhaug K. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ inhibition promotes antitumor responses but antagonizes checkpoint inhibitors. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.120626 (Epub 2018 Jun 7).