Advertisement

Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 659–672 | Cite as

Population Pharmacokinetics of the BTK Inhibitor Acalabrutinib and its Active Metabolite in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with B-Cell Malignancies

  • Helena EdlundEmail author
  • Sun Ku Lee
  • Marilee A. Andrew
  • J. Greg Slatter
  • Sergey Aksenov
  • Nidal Al-Huniti
Original Research Article
  • 189 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a key component of B-cell receptor signalling, critical for cell proliferation. Acalabrutinib, a selective, covalent BTK inhibitor, recently received an accelerated approval in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. This analysis characterized the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of acalabrutinib and its metabolite ACP-5862.

Methods

Data were obtained from six phase I/II trials in adult patients with B-cell malignancy and seven phase I trials in healthy volunteers. Pooled concentration-time data, at dose levels ranging from 15 to 400 mg, were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. Base model parameters were scaled with body weight and normalized to 70 kg (fixed exponents: 0.75 and 1 for clearance and volumes, respectively). A full covariate approach was used to evaluate any relevant effects of dose, health group/disease status, hepatic and renal impairment, use of acid-reducing agents, race and sex.

Results

A total of 11,196 acalabrutinib and 1068 ACP-5862 concentration-time samples were available. The PK of both analytes were well described using two-compartment disposition models. Acalabrutinib absorption was characterized using sequential zero- and first-order constants and a lag time. Apparent clearance (CL/F) of acalabrutinib was 169 L/h (95% CI 159–175). Relative to the 100 mg dose group, the 15 and 400 mg dose groups showed a 1.44-fold higher and 0.77-fold lower CL/F, respectively. The clearance for ACP-5862 was 21.9 L/h (95% CI 19.5–24.0). The fraction metabolized was fixed to 0.4. The central and peripheral volumes of distribution were 33.1 L (95% CI 24.4–41.0) and 226 L (95% CI 149–305) for acalabrutinib, and 38.5 L (95% CI 31.6–49.2) and 38.4 L (95% CI 32.3–47.9) for ACP-5862. None of the investigated covariates led to clinically meaningful changes in exposure.

Conclusion

The PK of acalabrutinib and its metabolite ACP-5862 were adequately characterized. Acalabrutinib CL/F decreased with increasing dose, but the trend was small over the 75–250 mg range. No dose adjustment was necessary for intrinsic or extrinsic covariates.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Karthick Vishwanathan (AstraZeneca), Eric Masson (Biogen, previously at AstraZeneca), Feng Jin (Theravance, previously at Acerta Pharma), Jennifer Juntado (Acerta Pharma), Ming Yin (Acerta Pharma).

Author Contributions

H. Edlund designed and performed the research, analysed the PK data (parent) and drafted the manuscript; S.K. Lee designed and performed the research, analysed the PK data (metabolite) and edited the manuscript; and M.A. Andrew, J.G. Slatter, S. Aksenov, and N. Al-Huniti designed the research and edited the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

The underlying clinical studies were sponsored by Acerta Pharma (a member of the AstraZeneca group).

Conflict of interest

Helena Edlund, Sun Ku Lee, Marilee A. Andrew, J. Greg Slatter, Sergey Aksenov and Nidal Al-Huniti were all employed by Acerta Pharma or AstraZeneca at the time this work was conducted.

Supplementary material

40262_2018_725_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4050 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Küppers R. Mechanisms of B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaffer AL, Rosenwald A, Staudt LM. Lymphoid malignancies: the dark side of B-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:920–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gayko U, Fung M, Clow F, Sun S, Faust E, Price S, et al. Development of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib for B cell malignancies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1358:82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendriks RW, Yuvaraj S, Kil LP. Targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cell malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:219–32 (Nature Publishing Group).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barf T, Covey T, Izumi R, van de Kar B, Gulrajani M, van Lith B, et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196): a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor with a differentiated selectivity and in vivo potency profile. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;363:240–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang M, Rule S, Zinzani PL, Goy A, Casasnovas O, Smith SD, et al. Acalabrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (ACE-LY-004): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017;6736:1–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    US FDA. Calquence (acalabrutinib) Label. 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/210259s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2018.
  8. 8.
    Byrd JC, Harrington B, O’Brien S, Jones JA, Schuh A, Devereux S, et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:323–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edlund H, Andrew M, Jin F, Patel P, Masson E, Slatter JG, et al. Population Pharmacokinetics of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Acalabrutinib, in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with B-Cell Malignancies. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):4997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahn JE, Karlsson MO, Dunne A, Ludden TM. Likelihood based approaches to handling data below the quantification limit using NONMEM VI. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2008;35:401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson BJ, Holford NHG. Mechanism-based concepts of size and maturity in pharmacokinetics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:303–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mould DR, Upton RN. Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development—Part 2: introduction to pharmacokinetic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2013;2:e38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Al-Huniti N, Chapel S, Xu H, Bui KH, Sostek M. Population pharmacokinetics of naloxegol in a population of 1247 healthy subjects and patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81:89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ravva P, Gastonguay MR, Tensfeldt TG, Faessel HM. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of varenicline in adult smokers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68:669–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jin F, Yin M, Mandava V, Edlund H, Andrew M, Patel P, et al. Exposure-response of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acalabrutinib in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):1268.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna; 2015. http://www.r-project.org/.
  17. 17.
    Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, Bauer RJ. NONMEM user’s guides (1989–2009). Ellicott City: Icon Development Solutions; 2009.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindbom L, Ribbing J, Jonsson EN. Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN): a Perl module for NONMEM related programming. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;75:85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Savic RM, Jonker DM, Kerbusch T, Karlsson MO. Implementation of a transit compartment model for describing drug absorption in pharmacokinetic studies. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007;34:711–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yates JW, Jones RO, Walker M, Cheung SA. Structural identifiability and indistinguishability of compartmental models. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009;5:295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rowland M, Tozer TN. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: concepts and applications. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech UnitAstraZenecaBostonUSA
  2. 2.Quantitative Clinical PharmacologyAcerta PharmaSouth San FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.DMPK/Clinical PharmacologyAcerta PharmaBellevueUSA

Personalised recommendations