Adherence to Anticoagulation and Risk of Stroke Among Medicare Beneficiaries Newly Diagnosed with Atrial Fibrillation
The objective of this study was to compare the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) with adherent use of oral anticoagulation (OAC), non-adherent use, and non-use of OAC.
Using 2013–2016 Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2014–2015 and collected prescriptions filled for OAC in the 12 months after AF diagnosis (n = 39,272). We categorized participants each day into three time-dependent exposures: adherent use (≥ 80% of the previous 30 days covered with OAC), non-adherent use (0–80% covered with OAC), and non-use (0%). We constructed Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the association between time-dependent exposures and time to stroke, adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics.
The sample included 39,272 patients. Study participants spent 35.0% of the follow-up period in the adherent use exposure category, 10.9% in the non-adherent category, and 54.0% in the non-use category. OAC adherent use [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–0.74] and non-adherent use (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57–0.95) were associated with lower hazards of stroke than non-use. Adherent use of DOAC (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.42–0.69) and warfarin (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56–0.89) was associated with lower risk of stroke than non-use, but the risk of stroke did not statistically differ between DOAC and warfarin adherent use (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.56–1.04).
Although adherence to OAC reduces stroke risk by nearly 40%, newly diagnosed AF patients in Medicare adhere to OAC on average only one third of the first year after AF diagnosis.
This work represents the opinions of the authors alone and does not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This work was funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (Grant number K01HL142847).
Conflict of interest
Saba has received research support from Boston Scientific. Hernandez has received advisory board fees from Pfizer. He, Brooks and Gellad declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.
- 2.January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hernandez I, Saba S, Zhang Y. Geographic variation in the use of oral anticoagulation in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 48:2289–2291.Google Scholar
- 14.Yao X, Abraham NS, Alexander GC, et al. Effect of adherence to oral anticoagulants on risk of stroke and major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5(2).Google Scholar
- 18.Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. 27 Chronic Condition Algorithm. https://www.ccwdata.org/cs/groups/public/documents/document/ccw_condition_categories.pdf Accessed April 26, 2017.Google Scholar
- 19.Kumamaru H, Judd SE, Curtis JR, et al. Validity of claims-based stroke algorithms in contemporary Medicare data: reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study linked with Medicare claims. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(4):611–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lo-Ciganic WH, Donohue JM, Jones BL, et al. Trajectories of diabetes medication adherence and hospitalization risk: a retrospective cohort study in a large state Medicaid program. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(9):1052–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3747-6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Gray M, Saba S, Zhang Y, Hernandez I. Outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients newly recommended for oral anticoagulation under the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline. J Am Heart Assn 7(1):e007881.Google Scholar