Migraine headache and depression in adults: a systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 153 Downloads
Migraines have adverse psychological consequences, one of which is the tendency towards depression. This study aimed to investigate the effects of migraine on adults’ depression in the form of a systematic review and meta-analysis
Several scientific databases were searched using relevant keywords until the end of January 2018. After reviewing the titles and abstracts and the full texts, the researchers eventually included 16 eligible articles. Major and sub-group analyses were carried out using random effects. Publication bias was also measured.
Pooled Odd Ratio (PR) = 1.95; and 95% confidence interval (CI) = CI = 1.61–2.35 were obtained in studying the effects of migraine on depression. This effect was equal to OR = 1.81 (95% CI = 1.20–2.72) in cohort studies, and OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.64–2.43 in cross sectional studies. The heterogeneity was high, and no publication bias was found.
Migraine can play an important role in increasing the incidence of depression in affected patients. Therefore, identifying and ultimately treating the disease can be beneficial in reducing the negative psychological effects of this disease.
KeywordsMigraine Depression Meta-analysis Systematic-review
Migräne und Depression bei Erwachsenen: Ein systematisches Review und Meta-Analyse
SchlüsselwörterMigräne Depression Meta-Analyse Systematisches Review
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Conflict of interest
S. Amiri, S. Behnezhad, and E. Azad declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.World Health Organization. Headache disorders. 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs277/en/.Google Scholar
- 31.ICHD. The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl 1):9–160.Google Scholar
- 32.Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):12–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar