Advertisement

Effect of immature and mature compost addition on petroleum contaminated soils composting: kinetics

  • Mahdi Farzadkia
  • Ali Esrafili
  • Mitra Gholami
  • Ali KoolivandEmail author
Research article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The kinetic studies and effect of amendment addition on the performance of the composting process in reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) from petroleum contaminated soils (PCS) were investigated in the present research.

Methods

Seven composting experiments containing various mixing ratios of PCS to unfinished compost (UC) and finished compost (FC) were set up and operated for 14 weeks. The mixing rations consisted of 1:0 (as control experiment), 1:0.3, 1:0.6, and 1:1. The initial C/N/P and moisture contents of the composting piles were adjusted to 100/5/1 and 50–55%, respectively.

Results

Results showed that 50.09–79.49% of TPH was removed in the composting experiments after 14 weeks. The highest and lowest removal rates were achieved in the ratios of 1:1 and 1:0.3, respectively. Moreover, application of UC as amendments and bulking agent is more efficient than FC. The biodecomposition of TPH was fitted to the first-order kinetic with the half lives and rate constants of 5.63–11.55 days and 0.060–0.123 d−1, respectively. The bacteria detected from the composting treatments were Staphylococcus sp., Bacillus sp., and Pseudomonas sp.

Conclusions

The study confirmed the suitability of composting process for PCS bioremediation and superiority of UC than FC as bulking agent.

Keywords

Petroleum contaminated soil Bioremediation Composting process Amendments Immature compost Mature compost 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge Iran University of Medical Sciences for supporting and funding [Grant Number 92-02-27-23546] this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Varjani SJ. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Bioresour Technol. 2017;223:277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Han T, Zhao Z, Bartlam M, Wang Y. Combination of biochar amendment and phytoremediation for hydrocarbon removal in petroleum-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(21):21219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McWatters RS, Wilkins D, Spedding T, Hince G, Raymond B, Lagerewskij G, et al. On site remediation of a fuel spill and soil reuse in Antarctica. Sci Total Environ. 2016;571:963–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen M, Xu P, Zeng G, Yang C, Huang D, Zhang J. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum, pesticides, chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting: applications, microbes and future research needs. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(6):745–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zabbey N, Sam K, Onyebuchi AT. Remediation of contaminated lands in the Niger Delta, Nigeria: prospects and challenges. Sci Total Environ. 2017;586:952–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farzadkia M, Dehghani M, Moafian M. The effects of Fenton process on the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons from oily sludge in Shiraz oil refinery, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014; 14;12(1):31.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu Y, Zhang W, Chen G, Gao Y, Wang J. Preparation of petroleum-degrading bacterial agent and its application in remediation of contaminated soil in Shengli oil field. China Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21(13):7929–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martinkosky L, Barkley J, Sabadell G, Gough H, Davidson S. Earthworms (Eisenia fetida) demonstrate potential for use in soil bioremediation by increasing the degradation rates of heavy crude oil hydrocarbons. Sci Total Environ. 580:734–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suja F, Rahim F, Taha MR, Hambali N, Razali MR, Khalid A, et al. Effects of local microbial bioaugmentation and biostimulation on the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in crude oil contaminated soil based on laboratory and field observations. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014;90:115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mattei P, Cincinelli A, Martellini T, Natalini R, Pascale E, Renella G. Reclamation of river dredged sediments polluted by PAHs by co-composting with green waste. Sci Total Environ:566–567–7–574.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koolivand A, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Jafari A, Nasseri S, Yunesian M, et al. Application of hydrogen peroxide and Fenton as pre-and post-treatment steps for composting of bottom sludge from crude oil storage tanks. Pet Sci Technol. 2014;32(13):1562–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morillo E, Villaverde J. Advanced technologies for the remediation of pesticide-contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ. 2017;586:576–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Talaiekhozani A, Jafarzadeh N, Fulazzaky MA, Talaie MR, Beheshti M. Kinetics of substrate utilization and bacterial growth of crude oil degraded by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2015;24;13(1):64.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu M, Li W, Dick WA, Ye X, Chen K, Kost D, et al. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon degradation in a petroleum contaminated soil and microbial population and activity determination. Chemosphere. 2017;169:124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang X, Liu X, Wang Q, Chen X, Li H, Wei J, et al. Diesel degradation potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from Scirpus triqueter. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014;87:99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Guan Y, Shi Q. Simulating the dynamics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) in contaminated soil through composting by COP-compost model. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(4):3004–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asgari A, Nabizadeh R, Mahvi AH, Nasseri S, Dehghani MH, Nazmara S, et al. Biodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons from acidic sludge produced by re-refinery industries of waste oil using in-vessel composting. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2017; 27;15(1):3.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kasinski S, Slota M, Markowski M, Kaminska A. Municipal waste stabilization in a reactor with an integrated active and passive aeration system. Waste Manag. 2016;50:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ma J, Yang Y, Dai X, Chen Y, Deng H, Zhou H, et al. Effects of adding bulking agent, inorganic nutrient and microbial inocula on biopile treatment for oil-field drilling waste. Chemosphere. 2016;150:17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rossini-Oliva S, Mingorance M, Peña A. Effect of two different composts on soil quality and on the growth of various plant species in a polymetallic acidic mine soil. Chemosphere. 2017;168:183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zazouli MA, Asgharnia H, Yazdani Cherati J, Ziaee Hezarjeribi H, Ahmadnezhad A. Evaluation of cow manure effect as bulking agent on concentration of heavy metals in municipal sewage sludge vermicomposting. JMUMS. 2015;25(124):152–69.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lukić B, Huguenot D, Panico A, Fabbricino M, van Hullebusch ED, Esposito G. Importance of organic amendment characteristics on bioremediation of PAH-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(15):15041–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sayara T, Sarrà M, Sánchez A. Optimization and enhancement of soil bioremediation by composting using the experimental design technique. Biodegradation. 2010;21(3):345–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koolivand A, Godini K, Saeedi R, Abtahi H, Ghamari F. Oily sludge biodegradation using a new two-phase composting method: kinetics studies and effect of aeration rate and mode. Process Biochem. 2018;79:127–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koolivand A, Rajaei MS, Ghanadzadeh MJ, Saeedi R, Abtahi H, Godini K. Bioremediation of storage tank bottom sludge by using a two-stage composting system: effect of mixing ratio and nutrients addition. Bioresour Technol. 235: 240–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    TNRCC. Total petroleum hydrocarbons, method 1005. In: Revision 03. Texas Natural Resource Conservation: Commission; 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    TMECC. 2002. Test methods for the examination of composting and compost. USDA and US Composting Council.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    APHA (American Public Health Association). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC, USA: APHA-AWWA-WEF; 2011.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nwankwegu AS, Orji MU, Onwosi CO. Studies on organic and in-organic biostimulants in bioremediation of diesel-contaminated arable soil. Chemosphere. 2016;162:148–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yanto DHY, Tachibana S. Potential of fungal co-culturing for accelerated biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. J Hazard Mater. 2014;278:454–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koolivand A, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Nasseri S, Jafari AJ, Yunesian M, et al. Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons from bottom sludge of crude oil storage tanks using in-vessel composting followed by oxidation with hydrogen peroxide and Fenton. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage. 2013;15(3):321–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koolivand A, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Nasseri S, Jafari AJ, Yunesian M, et al. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons of bottom sludge from crude oil storage tanks by in-vessel composting. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2013;95(1):101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Koolivand A, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Saeedi R. Optimization of combined in-vessel composting process and chemical oxidation for remediation of bottom sludge of crude oil storage tanks. Environ Technol. 2018;39(20):2597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang L, Sun X. Influence of bulking agents on physical, chemical, and microbiological properties during the two-stage composting of green waste. Waste Manag. 2016;48:115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang SY, Kuo YC, Hong A, Chang YM, Kao CM. Bioremediation of diesel and lubricant oil-contaminated soils using enhanced landfarming system. Chemosphere. 2016;164:558–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang Y, Zhu Y-G, Houot S, Qiao M, Nunan N, Garnier P. Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminated soil through composting with fresh organic wastes. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2011;18(9):1574–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kulikowska D. Kinetics of organic matter removal and humification progress during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag. 2016;49:196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gomez F, Sartaj M. Field scale ex-situ bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil under cold climate conditions. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2013;85:375–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    He XS, Xi BD, Zhang ZY, Gao RT, Tan WB, Cui DY. Insight into the evolution, redox, and metal binding properties of dissolved organic matter from municipal solid wastes using two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy. Chemosphere. 2014;117:701–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cui E, Wu Y, Zuo Y, Chen H. Effect of different biochars on antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial community during chicken manure composting. Bioresour Technol. 2016;203:11–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fountoulakis M, Terzakis S, Georgaki E, Drakopoulou S, Sabathianakis I, Kouzoulakis M, et al. Oil refinery sludge and green waste simulated windrow composting. Biodegradation. 2009;20(2):177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang Q, Zhu L, Su J, Wang J, Xie H, Wang J, et al. Impacts of nitrogen and phosphorus on atrazine-contaminated soil remediation and detoxification by Arthrobacter sp. strain HB-5. Environ Earth Sci. 2014;71(3):1465–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of HealthArak University of Medical SciencesArakIran

Personalised recommendations