Advertisement

DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 673–681 | Cite as

Improved transdermal delivery of cetirizine hydrochloride using polymeric microneedles

  • Muhammad Sohail Arshad
  • Sana Hassan
  • Amjad Hussain
  • Nasir Abbas
  • Israfil Kucuk
  • Kazem Nazari
  • Radeyah Ali
  • Suleman Ramzan
  • Ali Alqahtani
  • Eleftherios G. Andriotis
  • Dimitris G. Fatouros
  • Ming-Wei Chang
  • Zeeshan AhmadEmail author
Research article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to design and characterize microneedle patch formulation containing cetirizine hydrochloride.

Methods

Chitosan was co-formulated with cetirizine hydrochloride. Transdermal patches were prepared by casting this solution to microneedle molds. Control patches were formulated by casting this solution to a plain cuvet of same area as mold but lacking microneedles. An array of methods namely; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were employed for the characterization of the films and the microneedles accordingly whereas in vitro permeation studies were conducted across rat skin. Light microscopy was performed to assess any histological changes upon microneedles application onto the rat skin.

Results

The patches had a reproducible thickness (0.86 ± 0.06 mm) and folding endurance. Both the blank and drug loaded patches had 100 microneedles each of 300 micrometre length. In addition, the microneedle patches were ascribed with a two-fold increase in drug permeation across rat skin in the presence of microneedles as compared to the control formulations. Histological examination confirms a minimal invasion of the skin conferred by the microneedles.

Conclusion

The microneedle patches serve as an alternate route of drug administration in patients with nausea and swelling difficulties.

Graphical abstract

Microneedle patch manifest a two-fold increase in the skin permeation of Cetirizine Hydrochloride as compared to the control that is drug loaded patch without microneedles

Keywords

Microneedles Transdermal Drug delivery Cetirizine Hydrochloride 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by Higher Education Commision of Pakistan under National Research Program for Universities (NRPU) vide No: 7401/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2017.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript and the study (i.e. through various streams be it planning, experiments, analysis of data, data preparation etc).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Ranade VV, Hollinger MA. Drug delivery systems. FL, USA: CRC press Boca Raton; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naik A, Kalia YN, Guy RH. Transdermal drug delivery: overcoming the skin’s barrier function. Pharm Sci Technol To. 2000;3(9):318–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patel D, Chaudhary SA, Parmar B, Bhura N. Transdermal drug delivery system: a review. The Pharma Innovation. 2012;1(4).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rasekh M, Karavasili C, Soong YL, Bouropoulos N, Morris M, Armitage D, et al. Electrospun PVP–indomethacin constituents for transdermal dressings and drug delivery devices. Int J Pharm. 2014;473(1):95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.059.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad Z, Stride E, Edirisinghe M. Novel preparation of transdermal drug-delivery patches and functional wound healing materials. J Drug Target. 2009;17(9):724–9.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10611860903085386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larrañeta E, Lutton RE, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF. Microneedle arrays as transdermal and intradermal drug delivery systems: Materials science, manufacture and commercial development. Mat Sci Eng: R: Reports. 2016;104:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ita K. Dissolving microneedles for transdermal drug delivery: Advances and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;93:1116–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larrañeta E, McCrudden MT, Courtenay AJ, Donnelly RF. Microneedles: a new frontier in nanomedicine delivery. Pharm Res. 2016;33(5):1055–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan H, Mehta P, Msallam H, Armitage D, Ahmad Z. Smart microneedle coatings for controlled delivery and biomedical analysis. J Drug Target. 2014;22(9):790–5.  https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2014.921926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bystrova S, Luttge R. Micromolding for ceramic microneedle arrays. Microelectron Eng. 2011;88(8):1681–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee K, Jung H. Drawing lithography for microneedles: a review of fundamentals and biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2012;33(30):7309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Omatsu T, Chujo K, Miyamoto K, Okida M, Nakamura K, Aoki N, et al. Metal microneedle fabrication using twisted light with spin. Opt Express. 2010;18(17):17967–73.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.017967. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim JD, Kim M, Yang H, Lee K, Jung H. Droplet-born air blowing: novel dissolving microneedle fabrication. J Control Release. 2013;170(3):430–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.05.026. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park J-H, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR. Polymer microneedles for controlled-release drug delivery. Pharm Res. 2006;23(5):1008–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haj-Ahmad R, Khan H, Arshad M, Rasekh M, Hussain A, Walsh S, et al. Microneedle Coating Techniques for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(4):486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goindi S, Kumar G, Kumar N, Kaur A. Development of novel elastic vesicle-based topical formulation of cetirizine dihydrochloride for treatment of atopic dermatitis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(4):1284–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang M, Hu L, Xu C. Recent advances in the design of polymeric microneedles for transdermal drug delivery and biosensing. Lab Chip. 2017;17(8):1373–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen M-C, Ling M-H, Lai K-Y, Pramudityo E. Chitosan microneedle patches for sustained transdermal delivery of macromolecules. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(12):4022–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang C, Wang Z-C, Quan C-Y, Cheng H, Cheng S-X, Zhang X-Z, et al. Fabrication of a novel pH-sensitive glutaraldehyde cross-linked pectin nanogel for drug delivery. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2007;18(12):1591–9.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856207794761925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Demir YK, Akan Z, Kerimoglu O. Characterization of Polymeric Microneedle Arrays for Transdermal Drug Delivery. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77289.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077289. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seok H-y, Suh H, Baek S, Kim Y-C. Microneedle applications for DNA vaccine delivery to the skin. DNA Vaccines: Methods and Protocols. 2014:141-58.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma Y, Gill HS. Coating Solid Dispersions on Microneedles via a Molten Dip-Coating Method: Development and In Vitro Evaluation for Transdermal Delivery of a Water-Insoluble Drug. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103(11):3621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moga KA, Bickford LR, Geil RD, Dunn SS, Pandya AA, Wang Y, et al. Rapidly–dissolvable microneedle patches via a highly scalable and reproducible soft lithography approach. Adv Mater. 2013;25(36):5060–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martin C, Allender CJ, Brain KR, Morrissey A, Birchall JC. Low temperature fabrication of biodegradable sugar glass microneedles for transdermal drug delivery applications. J Control Release. 2012;158(1):93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Migalska K, Morrow DI, Garland MJ, Thakur R, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF. Laser-engineered dissolving microneedle arrays for transdermal macromolecular drug delivery. Pharm Res. 2011;28(8):1919–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gittard SD, Ovsianikov A, Akar H, Chichkov B, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Stafslien S et al. Two Photon Polymerization-Micromolding of Polyethylene Glycol-Gentamicin Sulfate Microneedles. Adv Eng Mate. 2010;12(4).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Auner BG, Valenta C, Hadgraft J. Influence of phloretin and 6-ketocholestanol on the skin permeation of sodium-fluorescein. J Control Release. 2003;89(2):321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xie Y, Xu B, Gao Y. Controlled transdermal delivery of model drug compounds by MEMS microneedle array. Nanomedicine. 2005;1(2):184–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wankhede S, Lad K, Chitlange S. Development and validation of UV-spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of cetirizine hydrochloride and phenylephrine hydrochloride in tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res. 2012;4(3):222–6.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhatia NM, Ganbavale SK, More HN. Spectrophotometric estimation of ambroxol hydrochloride and cetirizine hydrochloride in tablets. Asian J Pharm. 2014;2(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Essen HF, Verdaasdonk MA, Elshof SM, de Weger RA, van Diest PJ. Alcohol based tissue fixation as an alternative for formaldehyde: influence on immunohistochemistry. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(12):1090–4.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2010.079905. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davis SP. Hollow microneedles for molecular transport across skin: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2004.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park J-H, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR. Biodegradable polymer microneedles: fabrication. mechanics and transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104(1):51–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jana S, Trivedi M, Tallapragada RM, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, et al. Characterization of Physicochemical and Thermal Properties of Chitosan and Sodium Alginate after Biofield Treatment. Pharm Anal Acta. 2015;10(6).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Soares JP, Santos J, Chierice GO, Cavalheiro E. Thermal behavior of alginic acid and its sodium salt. Eclética Química. 2004;29(2):57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guinesi LS, Cavalheiro ETG. The use of DSC curves to determine the acetylation degree of chitin/chitosan samples. Thermochim Acta. 2006;444(2):128–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Sohail Arshad
    • 1
  • Sana Hassan
    • 1
  • Amjad Hussain
    • 2
  • Nasir Abbas
    • 2
  • Israfil Kucuk
    • 3
  • Kazem Nazari
    • 4
  • Radeyah Ali
    • 4
  • Suleman Ramzan
    • 4
  • Ali Alqahtani
    • 4
  • Eleftherios G. Andriotis
    • 5
  • Dimitris G. Fatouros
    • 5
  • Ming-Wei Chang
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Zeeshan Ahmad
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of PharmacyBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  2. 2.College of PharmacyUniversity of the Punjab LahoreLahorePakistan
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering and natural sciencesBursa Technical UniversityBursaTurkey
  4. 4.The Leicester School of PharmacyDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK
  5. 5.Department of PharmacyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  6. 6.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Ministry of EducationZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  7. 7.Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardio-Cerebral Vascular Detection Technology and Medicinal Effectiveness AppraisalZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  8. 8.Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering CentreUniversity of UlsterNewtownabbeyUK

Personalised recommendations