Advertisement

Shear strength/microstructure relationship for dissimilar IN738/IN718 TLP joints

  • R. BakhtiariEmail author
  • A. Yarmou Shamsabadi
  • K. Alipour Moradi
Research Paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

MBF20 interlayer, as a commercial foil, was used for TLP bonding of IN738/MBF20/IN718 system at different temperatures and times. Microhardness and shear strength tests were conducted for all the samples. Hardness profile across the joints made at 1050 and 1100 °C revealed the microstructure regions as isothermal solidification zone (ISZ), athermal solidification zone (ASZ), and diffusion affected zone (DAZ). With increasing bonding time at each temperature, hardness peak at the joint centerline was removed but the hardness peak at DAZ remained. Increase of joint’s shear strength, increase of ISZ hardness, and decrease of DAZ hardness with increasing bonding temperature and/or time were discussed according to the effect of Larson-Miller parameter. Partial liquation of the base metals at 1150 °C/60 min condition caused reverse trend for variation of hardness and joint’s strength with bonding temperature. Fracture path of the joints with incomplete isothermal solidification was seen through the centerline eutectics. This path for the joints with complete isothermal solidification was observed through the bonding zone and the DAZ phases.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

TLP bonding IN718 superalloy IN738 superalloy MBF20 interlayer Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge Kermanshah Branch of Azad University for financial supports of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Rivaux B, Cao X, Jahazi M, Cuddy J, Birur A (2009) Effect of pre- and post-weld heat treatment on metallurgical and tensile properties of Inconel 718 alloy butt joints welded using 4 kW Nd:YAG laser. J Mater Sci 44:4557–4571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sajjadi SA, Nategh S, Gutherie IL (2002) Study of microstructure and mechanical properties of high perormnce Ni-base superalloy GTD-111. Mater Sci Eng A 325:484–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Idowu OA, Ojo OA, Chaturvedi MC (2006) Microstructure study of transient liquid phase bonded cast Inconel 738LC superalloy. Metall Mater Trans A 37A:2787–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ojo OA (2004) On liquation cracking of cast Inconel 738LC superalloy welds, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manitoba, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pouranvari M, Ekrami A, Kokabi A (2013) Transient liquid phase bonding of wrought IN718 nickel based superalloy using standard heat treatment cycles: microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Des 50:694–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rabinkin A (2004) Brazing with (NiCoCr)-B-Si amorphous brazing filler metals: alloys, processing, joint structure, properties, applications. Sci Technol Weld Join 9:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wikstrom NP, Egbewande AT, Ojo OA (2008) High temperature diffusioninduced liquid phase joining of a heat resistant alloy. J Alloys Compd 460:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pouranvari M, Ekrami A, Kokabi AH (2008) Microstructure–properties relationship of TLP-bonded GTD-111 nickel-base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 490:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abbasi Khazaei B, Jahanbakhsh A, Bakhtiari R (2016) TLP bonding of dissimilar FSX414/IN738 system with MBF80 interlayer: the effect of homogenizing treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 651:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    High performance brazing filler metal. http://www.metglas.com
  11. 11.
    Yarmou Shamsabadi A, Bakhtiari R, Eisaabadi B. G (2016) TLP bonding of IN738/MBF20/IN718 system. J Alloys Compd 685:896–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakhtiari R, Ekrami A, Khan TI (2015) Microstructure-mechanical properties relation of TLP-bonded FSX-414 superalloy: effect of homogenization design. J Mater Eng Perform 24:1687–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bakhtiari R, Ekrami A, Khan TI (2012) The effect of TLP bonding temperature on microstructural and mechanical property of joints made using FSX-414 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 546:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang YH, Xie YJ, Wang MS, Ye W (2013) Microstructure and tensile properties of nickel-based superalloy K417G bonded using transient liquid-phase infiltration. Mater Des 51:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venkadesan S, Bhaduri AK, Rodriguez P, Padmanabhan KA (1992) Effect of ageing on the microstructural stability of cold-worked titanium-modified 15Cr-15Ni—2.5 Mo austenitic stainless steel. J Nucl Mater 186:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moosavy HN, Aboutalebi MR, Seyedein SH, Mapelli C (2013) Microstructural, mechanical and weldability assessments of the dissimilar welds between γ’-and γ″ -strengthened nickel-base superalloys. Mater Charact 82:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kozar RW, Suzuki A, Milligan WW, Schirra JJ, Savage MF, Pollock TM (2009) Strengthening mechanisms in polycrystalline multimodal nickel-base superalloys. Metall Mater Trans A 40:1588–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gypen LA, Deruytter A (1977) Multi-component solid solution hardening. J Mater Sci 12:1028–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roth HA, Davis CL, Thomson RC (1997) Modeling solid solution strengthening in nickel alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 28:1329–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Bakhtiari
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Yarmou Shamsabadi
    • 2
  • K. Alipour Moradi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Materials and Textile Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringRazi UniversityKermanshahIran
  2. 2.Department of Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, Kermanshah BranchIslamic Azad UniversityKermanshahIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringRazi UniversityKermanshahIran

Personalised recommendations