Advertisement

Fracture toughness evaluation for dissimilar steel joints by Charpy impact test

  • Yasuhito TakashimaEmail author
  • Yusuke Ito
  • Fenggui Lu
  • Fumiyoshi Minami
Research Paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The influence of strength mismatch in a dissimilar steel joint on the Charpy absorbed energy was numerically analyzed on the basis of the Beremin model. The toughness correction ratio γCVN was defined as the ratio of the Charpy absorbed energy of a dissimilar steel joint specimen to that of a homogeneous specimen under the same Weibull stress. The Charpy test results for a clad joint of dissimilar steels were characterized using γCVN. A fracture toughness evaluation method was developed from the Charpy data for dissimilar steel joints considering γCVN. The fracture toughness at temperature T was predicted according to ASTM E1921 and BS 7910:2015 standards using the 27 J transition temperature T27J determined from the estimated Charpy transition curve. The predicted KJc transition curve showed reasonable agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords

Fracture toughness Impact toughness Dissimilar joints Mismatch 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number JP17K14822) and financially supported by Project to Create Research and Educational Hubs for Innovative Manufacturing in Asia, Osaka University of Special Budget Project of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Ruggieri C, Minami F, Toyoda M (1993) Effect of strength mismatch on crack tip stress fields of HAZ-notched joints subjected to bending and tension. J Soc Naval Arch Jpn 174:543–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seo K, Nogata F, Masaki J (1986) The absorbed energy in Charpy impact test for specimens with mechanical heterogeneity. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 35:1405–1410 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takashima Y, Yamada YS, Handa T, Igi S, Oi K, Minami F (2015) Numerical analysis of strength mismatch effect on stress field in Charpy specimen. Weld World 59:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ito Y, Takashima Y, Handa T, Igi S, Oi K, Minami F (2016) Evaluation of brittle fracture resistance of dissimilar joints by the Weibull stress criterion. Preprints of the National Meeting of JWS 398–399. (in Japanese)  https://doi.org/10.14920/jwstaikai.2017f.0_60
  5. 5.
    Ito Y, Takashima Y, Minami F (2017) Strength mismatch effects on Charpy absorbed energy and CTOD fracture toughness. Quart J Jpn Weld Soc 35:61s–65sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takashima Y, Ohata M, Inose K, Yamaoka H, Nakanishi Y, Minami F (2016) Evaluation of Charpy impact toughness using side-grooved specimen for hybrid laser-arc welds of ultra-high-strength steel. Weld World 60:1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barsom JM (1975) Development of the AASHTO fracture-toughness requirements for bridge steels. Eng Fract Mech 7:605–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wallin K (1989) A simple theoretical Charpy-V KIc correlation for irradiation embrittlement. In: Proc ASME Pressure Vessels and PipingConference: Innovative Approaches to Irradiation Damage and Fracture Analysis 170:93–100Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    British Standards (2013) BS7910: guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structuresGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beremin FM, Pineau A, Mudry F, Devaux JC, D’Escatha Y, Ledermann P (1983) A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metallurgical Trans A 14:2277–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minami F, Brückner-Foit A, Trolldenier B (1990) Numerical procedure for determining Weibull parameters based on the local approach. In: Proc Euro Conf on Fract ECF8: 76–81Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruggieri C, Minami F, Toyoda M, Hagiwara Y, Inoue T (1992) Local approach to notch depth dependence of CTOD results. J Soc Naval Arch Jpn 171:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minami F, Brückner-Foit A, Munz D, Trolldenier B (1992) Estimation procedure for the Weibull parameters used in the local approach. Int J Fract 54:197–210Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takashima Y, Handa T, Minami F (2017) Three-dimensional dynamic explicit finite element analysis of Charpy impact test. Mater Sci Forum 879:1905–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takashima Y, Handa T, Ito Y, Minami F (2018) Dynamic finite element analysis based on the Hertzian contact theory for effect of striker radius on impact response for Charpy specimen. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 67:977–984 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taylor GI, Quinney H (1934) The latent energy remaining in a metal after cold working. Proc Royal Soc Lond A 143:307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bennett PE, Sinclair GM (1966) Parameter representation of low-temperature yield behavior of body-centered cubic transition metals. J Basic Eng 88:518–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kubo T, Igi S, Shimanuki H, Yamauchi M, Minami F, Toyoda M (2001) Estimation of strength of steel subjected to plastic pre-strain and dynamic loading. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Welding Symposium (7WS). 1129–1134Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oldfield W (1979) Fitting curves to toughness data. J Test Eval 7:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASTM international (2016) ASTM E1921: test method for the determination of reference temperature, T 0 for ferritic steels in the transition rangeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ohata M, Minami F, Toyoda M (1996) Evaluation of HAZ fracture toughness of welded joints with strength mis-matching by the local approach. J Soc Naval Arch Jpn 180:565–573 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joining and Welding Research InstituteOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations