Advertisement

Welding in the World

, Volume 62, Issue 6, pp 1159–1171 | Cite as

Texture evolution and plastic deformation mechanism in magnetic pulse welding of dissimilar Al and Mg alloys

  • Xiaoqing Jiang
  • Shujun Chen
Research Paper
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Texture evolution and plastic deformation mechanism of the weld zones of magnetic pulse welded dissimilar 1060 pure Al and AZ31B Mg alloy have been investigated in the present work. A much refined microstructure with smaller grains and higher hardness was observed near the weld interface which has different texture types compared to the BM (base material) at both the Al side and the Mg side. The intermetallic layers at the interface of the Al side and the Mg side have the highest hardness. The region near the weld interface has higher activity of both slip and twinning. Slip occurs on two planes (111) and (\( \overline{1} \)11) in the Al BM, while the active slip systems in the Al region near the weld interface are on four planes (111), (11\( \overline{1} \)), (\( \overline{1} \)11) and (1\( \overline{1} \)1). The transition of single texture in the BM to complex texture type in the region near the weld interface at both the Al side and the Mg side was due to {111} slip and {10\( \overline{1} \)2} twinning, respectively.

Keywords

Magnetic pulse welding Texture Slip Twin Hardness 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the Ministry of Education Research Fund for the doctoral program of P.R. China (Grant No. 20111003110003) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51575012).

References

  1. 1.
    Weman K (2003) Welding processes ehandbook (Cambridge: Woodhead publishing ltd, England, and CRC Press LLC, North America, USA), pp. 94–101Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kapil A, Sharma A (2015) Magnetic pulse welding, an efficient and environmentally friendly multi-material joining technique. J Clean Prod 100(1):35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jassim AK (2011) Magnetic pulse welding technology. Iraq J Electr Electron Eng 7(2):169–179Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kochan A (2000) Magnetic pulse welding shows potential for automotive applications. Assem Autom 20(2):129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shribman V, Blakely M (2008) Benefits of the magnetic pulse process for welding dissimilar metals. Weld J 87(9):56–59Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu X, Shang J (2014) An investigation of magnetic pulse welding of Al/Cu and interface characterization. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(5):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui J, Sun G, Xu J, Xu Z, Huang X, Li G (2016) A study on the critical wall thickness of the inner tube for magneticpulse welding of tubular Al-Fe parts. J Mater Process Technol 2(27):138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kastensson A (2014) Developing lightweight concepts in the automotive industry, taking on the environmental challenge with the SaNatt project. J Clean Prod 66(66):337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cui J, Sun G, Li ZX, Chu PK (2014) Specific wave interface and its formation during magnetic pulse welding. Appl Phys Lett 105(22):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nassiri A, Chini G, Kinsey B (2014) Spatial stability analysis of emergent wavy interfacial patterns in magnetic pulsed welding. CIRP Annals- Manuf Technol 63(1):245–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kore SD, Imbert J, Worswick MJ, Zhou Y (2009) Electromagnetic impact welding of Mg to Al sheets. Sci Technol Weld Join 14(6):549–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ben-Artzy A, Stern A, Frage N, Shribman V, Sadot O (2010) Wave formation mechanism in magnetic pulse welding. Intl J Impact Eng 37:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stern A, Aizenshtein M (2011) Magnetic pulse welding of Al to Mg alloys, structural-mechanical properties of the interfacial layer. Mater Sci Technol 27(12):1809–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stern A, Aizenshtein M, Moshe G, Cohen SR, Frage N (2013) The nature of interfaces in Al-1050/Al-1050 and Al-1050/Mg-AZ31 couples joined by magnetic pulse welding (MPW). J Mater Eng Perform 22(7):2098–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen S, Xia Y, Yu Y, Bai L, Lu Z (2012) Research on the interface morphology of magnetic pulse welded Al-Mg alloy. Rare Metal Mater Eng 41(2):352–354Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stern A, Shribman V, Ben-Artzy A, Aizenshtein M (2014) Interface phenomena and bonding mechanism in magnetic pulse welding. J Mater Eng Perform 23(10):3449–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang Y, Babu S, Daehn GS (2010) Impact welding in a variety of geometric configurations (the 4th International Conference on High Speed Forming Proc., Ohio, USA), p. 97–107Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berlin A 2010 Magnetic pulse welding of Mg sheet, Mater thesis, University of Waterloo, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berlin A, Nguyen TC, Worswick MJ, Zhou Y (2010) Metallurgical analysis of magnetic pulse welds of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 16(8):728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Markashova L, Arsenyuk VV, Grigorenko GM (2005) Relationship governing plastic deformation in pressure welding dissimilar metals. Weld Int 19(1):68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhen L, Zou DL, Xu CY, Shao WZ (2010) Microstructure evolution of adiabatic shear bands in AM60B magnesium alloy under ballistic impact. Mater Sci Eng A A527:5728–5733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang L (2008) A study of influence factors on interface microstructure and properties of explosive welding of composite materials, Master thesis, Nanjing University of Technology, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chiba A, Nishida M, Morizono Y (2004) Microstructure of bonding interface in explosively-welded clads and bonding mechanism. Mater Sci Forum 465-466:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Preuss M, Quinta da Fonseca J, Allen V, Prakash DGL, Daymond MR (2010) Twinning in structural material with a hexagonal close-packed crystal structure. Spec Issue Pap J Strain Anal 45(5):377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bhattacharya R 2010 Hot deformation studies on Mg AZ31 alloy using plane strain compression (PSC) machine. PhD thesis, The University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahmed MMZ (2009) The development of thick section welds and ultra-fine grain Al using friction stir welding and processing. PhD thesis, the University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Plummer J (2012) PhD thesis, the University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bunge HJ (1982) Texture analysis in materials science, mathematical methods, lst edn. Butterworth & Co., Berlin, pp 6–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang Y, Humphreys FJ, Ferry M (2000) The annealing behaviour of deformed cube oriented aluminium single crystals. Acta Mater 48(10):2543–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Humphreys FJ (2001) VMAP software, Manchester Materials science Centre, the University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization phenomenon and related annealing phenomena, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 268–320Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pedrosa ML (2007) An analysis of microstructure evolution in hot worked Al subjected to non-linear deformation. PhD thesis, the University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bishop JFW, Hill R (1951) A theoretical derivation of the plastic properties of a polycrystalline face-centred metal. Philos Mag 42(334):1298–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Randle V (2004) Application of electron backscatter diffraction to grain boundary characterization. Int Mater Rev 49(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Y, Chen M, Zhou F, Ma E (2002) High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419:912–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goodhew PJ (1979) Annealing twin formation by boundary dissociation. Metal Sci 13(3–4):108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang YN, Huang JC (2003) Review texture analysis in hexagonal material. Mater Chem Phys 81(1):11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gehrmann R, Frommert MM, Gottstein G (2005) Texture effects on plastic deformation of magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A 395(1):338–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yang P (2007) Electron backscatter diffraction technique and its application, 1st edn. Metallurgical Industry Press, China, p 146Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Balasubramanian S (1998) Polycrystalline plasticity, application to deformation processing of lightweight metals, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Staroselsky A, Anand L (2003) A constitutive model for hcp materials deforming by slip and twinning, application to magnesium alloy AZ31B. Int J Plast 19(10):1843–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ando S, Tsushida M, Kitahara H (2012) Plastic deformation behavior in magnesium alloy single crystals. Mater Sci Forum 706-709:1122–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wright SI (1993) A review of automated orientation imaging microscopy (OIM). J Comput Assist Micros 5(3):207–221Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mason TA, Adams BL (1994) The application of orientation imaging microscopy. J Miner Met Mater Soc 46(10):43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hong SG, Park SH, Lee CS (2010) Role of {10-12} twinning characteristics in the deformation behavior of a polycrystalline magnesium alloy. Acta Mater 58(2):5873–5885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Reed-Hill RE, Abbaschian R (1994) Physical metallurgy principles, 3rd edn. MA, BostonGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jiang J, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q (2008) Identification and analysis of twinning variants during compression of a Mg-Al-Zn alloy. Scr Mater 58(2):122–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yang P, Yu Y, Chen L, Mao W (2004) Experimental determination and theoretical prediction of twin orientations in magnesium alloy. Scr Mater 50(8):1163–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nave MD, Barnett MR (2004) Microstructures and textures of pure magnesium deformed in plane-strain compression. Scr Mater 51(9):881–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Clausen B, Leffers T, Lorentzen T, Pedersen OB, Houtte PV (1999) The resolved shear stress on the non-active slip systems in taylor/bishop-hill models for fcc polycrystals. Scr Mater 42(1):91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hirsch J, Nes E, Lücke K (1987) Rolling and recrystallization textures in directionally solidified aluminium. Acta Metall 35(2):427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T, Hong RG (1998) Ultra-fine grained bulk aluminum produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr Mater 39(9):1221–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vatne HE, Engler O, Nes E (1997) Influence of particles on recrystallisation textures and microstructures of aluminium alloy 3103. Mater Sci Technol 13(2):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hirsch J, Lṻcke K, Matherly M (1988) Overview NO. 76 Mechanism of deformation and development of rolling textures in polycrystalline fcc metals---III The influence of slip inhomogeneities and twinning. Acta Metall 36(11):2905–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hirsch J, Lṻcke K (1988) Overview no. 76: Mechanism of deformation and development of rolling textures in polycrystalline fcc metals—I Description of rolling texture development in homogeneous CuZn alloys. Acta Metall 36(11):2863–2882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yeung WY, Hirsch J, Hatherly M (1989) Rolling and annealing of fine grained 70:30 brass. Textures Microstructures 10(2):135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wasserman G (1963) Der Einfluss mechanischer Zwillingsbildung auf die Entstehung der Waltztexturen Kubisch flacheuzentrierter (The influence of mechanical twinning to the emergence of Waltz FCC texture). Metalle Z Metall 54:61Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Engler O, Heckelmann I, Rickert T, Hirsch J, Lucke K (1994) Effect of pretreatment and texture on recovery and recrystallisation in AI-4-5Mg-O-7Mn alloy. Mater Sci Technol 10(9):771–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Guiglionda G, Borbély A, Driver JH (2004) Orientation-dependent stored energies in hot deformed Al–2.5% Mg and their influence on recrystallization. Acta Mater 52(12):3413–3423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Saxl I, Haslingerová I (1974) Double prismatic slip in textured Mg-2 percent Be alloy. Czech J Phys B 24(12):1351–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gehrmann R, Frommert MM, Gottstein G (2005) Texture effects on plastic deformation of magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A 395(1–2):338–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ung’ar T, Glavicic MG, Balogh L, Nyilas K, Salem AA, Ribárika G, Semiatin SL (2008) The use of X-ray diffraction to determine slip and twinning activity in commercial-purity (CP) titanium. Mater Sci Eng A 493:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Agnew SR, Yoo MH, Tome CN (2001) Application of texture simulation to understanding mechanical behavior of Mg and solid solution alloys containing Li or Y. Acta Mater 49(20):4277–4289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yi SB, Davies CHJ, Brokmeier HG, Bolmaro RE, Kainer KU, Homeyer J (2006) Deformation and texture evolution in AZ31 magnesium alloy during uniaxial loading. Acta Mater 54:549–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Research Center of Advanced Manufacturing Technology for Automotive Structural Parts, Ministry of EducationBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations