Advertisement

Culture and Brain

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 80–91 | Cite as

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction enhances the self-effacing bias in Japanese individuals

  • Ryota TakanoEmail author
  • Michio Nomura
Original Research Article

Abstract

Identifying the cause of social events enables us to understand why our environment interacts with us in a certain way. Although previous studies suggest that the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is associated with internal attribution, the causal relationship remains unclear. The present study, firstly, aimed to investigate whether and how the attributional tendency could change with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the rTPJ. Secondly, since Japanese individuals tend to perform self-effacing attribution as a socially adaptive behavior, we examined whether the increased activation of the rTPJ, which facilitates the process of shaping self-concept from another perspective, might increase self-effacing attributions specifically among individuals who are highly sensitive to social rewards. Consistent with these predictions, we found that the increased activation of the rTPJ enhanced self-effacing bias, and this relationship was specifically observed among high reward dependent (RD) individuals. We also revealed that it took a longer time for the high RD participants to avoid self-responsibility for failure after the stimulation. These results suggest that anodal tDCS of the rTPJ could exacerbate self-blaming tendencies in Japanese individuals.

Keywords

Causal attribution Transcranial direct current stimulation Right temporoparietal junction Reward dependence Self-effacing bias 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K00205 and 15H01866).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, C. A., Krull, D. S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 271–296). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Blackwood, N. J., Bentall, R. P., Simmons, A., Murray, R. M., & Howard, R. J. (2003). Self-responsibility and the self-serving bias: An fMRI investigation of causal attributions. NeuroImage, 20(2), 1076–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00331-8.Google Scholar
  3. Breen, N., Caine, D., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Mirrored-self misidentification: Two cases of focal onset dementia. Neurocase, 7(3), 239–254.  https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/7.3.239.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the selfserving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23.Google Scholar
  5. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(6), 573–588.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014.Google Scholar
  6. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008.Google Scholar
  7. Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 733.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733.Google Scholar
  8. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.599.Google Scholar
  10. Hsu, T. Y., Tseng, L. Y., Yu, J. X., Kuo, W. J., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J., et al. (2011). Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage, 56(4), 2249–2257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.059 Google Scholar
  11. Izawa, F. (2011). The roles of optimistic explanatory style and dispositional optimism in an interpersonal stress process. Japanese Journal of Personality.  https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.19.255.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobson, L., Koslowsky, M., & Lavidor, M. (2012). tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: A meta-analytical review. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9.Google Scholar
  13. Kashima, Y., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). The self-serving bias in attributions as a coping strategy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(1), 83–97.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002186017001006.Google Scholar
  14. Kelley, H. H. (1967). The social psychology of groups. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Kestemont, J., Ma, N., Baetens, K., Clément, N., Van Overwalle, F., & Vandekerckhove, M. (2015). Neural correlates of attributing causes to the self, another person and the situation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu030.Google Scholar
  16. Kijima, N., Saito, R., Takeuchi, M., Yoshino, A., Ono, Y., Kato, M., et al. (1996). Cloninger’s seven-factor model of temperament and character and Japanese version of Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Archives of Psychiatric Diagnostics Clinical Evaluation, 7, 379–399.Google Scholar
  17. Kitayama, S., Takagi, H., & Matsumoto, H. (1995). Causal attribution of success and failure: Cultural psychology of the Japanese self. Japanese Psychological Review, 38(2), 247–280. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. Kojima, R. (1983, September). Jyoshidaisei ni okeru geninkizoku to yokuutsu-suijun tono kankei: ASQ nihon-go-ban ni yoru kento [The relationship between causal attribution and depression level in female college students: Using the Japanese version of ASQ]. Paper presented at the 47th meeting of Japanese Psychological Association, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  19. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 793.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.793.Google Scholar
  20. Mai, X., Zhang, W., Hu, X., Zhen, Z., Xu, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2016). Using tDCS to explore the role of the right temporo-parietal junction in theory of mind and cognitive empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 380.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00380.Google Scholar
  21. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.Google Scholar
  22. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.057.Google Scholar
  24. Muramoto, Y., & Yamaguchi, S. (1997). Another type of self-serving bias: Coexistence of self-effacing and group-serving tendencies in attribution in the Japanese culture. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 65–75 (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.37.65.Google Scholar
  25. Muramoto, Y., & Yamaguchi, S. (2003). When ‘self-effacement’ disappears: Narratives of personal and group successes depending on an ingroup relationship. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 43, 253–262 (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.74.253.Google Scholar
  26. Muramoto, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Kim, U. (2009). Perception of achievement attribution in individual and group contexts: Comparative analysis of Japanese, Korean, and Asian-American results. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(3), 199–210.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01285.x.Google Scholar
  27. Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., et al. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation, 1(3), 206–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004.Google Scholar
  28. Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(3), 633–639.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.Google Scholar
  29. Okamoto, M., Dan, H., Sakamoto, K., Takeo, K., Shimizu, K., Kohno, S., et al. (2004). Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage, 21(1), 99–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.026.Google Scholar
  30. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.Google Scholar
  31. Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2012). Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Current Biology, 22(23), 2274–2277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018.Google Scholar
  32. Seidel, E. M., Eickhoff, S. B., Kellermann, T., Schneider, F., Gur, R. C., Habel, U., et al. (2010). Who is to blame? Neural correlates of causal attribution in social situations. Social Neuroscience, 5(4), 335–350.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470911003615997.Google Scholar
  33. Seligman, M. E., Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., & Von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88(3), 242.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.88.3.242.Google Scholar
  34. Sellaro, R., Güroǧlu, B., Nitsche, M. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Massaro, V., Durieux, J., et al. (2015). Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction. Neuropsychologia, 77, 400–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.016.Google Scholar
  35. Sowden, S., Wright, G. R., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2015). Transcranial current stimulation of the temporoparietal junction improves lie detection. Current Biology, 25(18), 2447–2451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.014.Google Scholar
  36. Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93(3), 239–257.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.239.Google Scholar
  37. Tseng, P., Hsu, T. Y., Chang, C. F., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., Muggleton, N. G., et al. (2012). Unleashing potential: Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10554–10561.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0362-12.2012.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, Q., Chang, C. F., Xi, S., Huang, I. W., Liu, Z., Juan, C. H., et al. (2015). A critical role of temporoparietal junction in the integration of top‐down and bottom‐up attentional control. Human Brain Mapping, 36(11), 4317–4333.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22919.Google Scholar
  39. Yamauchi, H. (1988). Effects of actor’s and observer’s roles on causal attributions by Japanese subjects for success and failure in competitive situations. Psychological Reports, 63(2), 619–626.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.619.Google Scholar
  40. Ye, H., Chen, S., Huang, D., Zheng, H., Jia, Y., & Luo, J. (2015). Modulation of neural activity in the temporoparietal junction with transcranial direct current stimulation changes the role of beliefs in moral judgment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 659.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00659.Google Scholar
  41. Yoshida, A., & Ura, M. (2003). An examination of direct and indirect adaptation promoting effects through self-derogative presentation. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 120–130 (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.42.120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive Psychology in Education, Graduate School of EducationKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations