Advertisement

A social-ecological trap perspective to explain the emergence and persistence of illegal fishing in small-scale fisheries

  • Laura NahuelhualEmail author
  • Gonzalo Saavedra
  • María Amalia Mellado
  • Ximena Vergara Vergara
  • Tomás Vallejos
Research
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

We use the social-ecological trap (SET) concept and path-dependence analysis to explain the emergence and persistence of illegal fishing, taking the Chilean king crab fishery as a case study. The results suggest that the fishery is caught in a SET, which we label the “illegality trap”, characterized by positive feedbacks between regulation astringency, illegal access, fishers’ resistance, and fishing effort that keep the fishery in an undesirable state. As a process, illegal fishing arises as the denunciation of past poverty conditions and policies enacted to protect private rights to the sea, against traditional fishing logics. As a state of the system, illegal fishing is a relational phenomenon involving fishers, intermediaries, processors, and consumers. Over time, the different types of fishers emerge along well-structured international and local fish chains: the legal fisher, the cooperative fisher, the legal-illegal fisher, and the illegal fisher, encompassing a continuum from subsistence to competitive rationalities, which reflect adaptive strategies in the face of normative-legislative constrictions and market opportunities. Yet, the “legal” or the “illegal” is not a permanent condition, but it can be one and/or the other, depending on the circumstances. These results contend the reductionist view of the deterrence dogma which depicts illegal fishing as a matter of rational utility maximizers. On the contrary, the SET described here reflects the complexity of a problem with many edges, from legislation legitimacy to cultural responses across all the actors involved.

Keywords

Resource management syndromes Small-scale fisheries Fisheries governance Environmental crime Social-ecological systems 

Notes

Funding information

This research was funded by Grants FONDAP 15150003 and FONDECYT 1190207.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agnew, David J., John Pearce, Ganapathiraju Pramod, Tom Peatman, Reg Watson, John R. Beddington, and Tony J. Pitcher. 2009. Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS ONE 4: e4570.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almer, Christian, and Timo Goeschl. 2010. Environmental crime and punishment: empirical evidence from the German Penal Code. Land Economics 86: 707–726.  https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.4.707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, Andy B., Anthony R. Harris, and JoAnn Miller. 1983. Models of deterrence theory. Social Science Research 12: 236–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(83)90014-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battista, Willow, Dylan Larson-Konar, Sarah Lindley Smith, Jose Fraire, Rainer Romero-Canyas, Rod Fujita, and Micah Effron. 2018. Behavior change interventions to reduce illegal fishing. Frontiers in Marine Science 5: 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 75: 139–146.Google Scholar
  6. Bitrán, E. 1989. El desafío pesquero chileno: la explotación racional de nuestras riquezas marinas. Hachette, Santiago.Google Scholar
  7. Boonstra, Wiebren J., and Florianne W. De Boer. 2014. The historical dynamics of social-ecological traps. Ambio 43: 260–274.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0419-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brady, Henry E., and David Collier. 2008. In The handbook of political metodology, ed. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Hnery E. Brady, and David Collier. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cameron, Samuel. 1988. The economics of crime deterrence: a survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos 41: 301–323.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1988.tb02311.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavole, Letícia Maria, Caroline Chaves Arantes, and Leandro Castello. 2015. How illegal are tropical small-scale fisheries? An estimate for arapaima in the Amazon. Fisheries Research 168. Elsevier: 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FISHRES.2015.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceballos, Mauricio, and Francisco Ther. 2018. Transformaciones en las economías pesquero—artesanales contemporáneas: el caso de las localidades de Cucao y Tenaún, (Provincia de Chiloé, Región de Los Lagos, Chile). Cuadernos de Geografía: Revista Colombiana de Geografía 20: 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v20n2.27182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chalfin, Aaron, and Justin McCrary. 2017. Criminal deterrence: a review of the literature. Journal of Economic Literature 55: 5–48.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20141147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cinner, Joshua E. 2011. Social-ecological traps in reef fisheries. Global Environmental Change 21: 835–839.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cumming, Graeme S. 2018. A review of social dilemmas and social-ecological traps in conservation and natural resource management. Conservation Letters 11: 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, Anthony, and Kenneth Ruddle. 2012. Massaging the misery: recent approaches to fisheries governance and the betrayal of small-scale fisheries. Human Organization 71: 244–254.  https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.71.3.205788362x751128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enfors, Elin. 2013. Social-ecological traps and transformations in dryland agro-ecosystems: using water system innovations to change the trajectory of development. Global Environmental Change 23. Elsevier Ltd: 51–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. 2016. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, Italy, 200 p.Google Scholar
  18. Frawley, Timothy H., Elena M. Finkbeiner, and Larry B. Crowder. 2019. Environmental and institutional degradation in the globalized economy: lessons from small-scale fisheries in the Gulf of California. Ecology and Society 24: 7.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-10693-240107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2004. Case Studies and Social Sciences. MA, MIT: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaría, Violeta. 2010. Sujetos colectivos en búsqueda de sustentabilidad pesquera. Polis Revista Lationamericana 27: 16.Google Scholar
  21. Guerrero, Rosa María, and Mabel Alarcón. 2018. Neoliberalismo y transformaciones socio-espaciales en caletas urbanas del Área Metropolitana de Concepción. Los casos de Caleta Los Bagres y Caleta Cocholgüe, Tomé. Revista de Urbanismo 38: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-5051.2018.48666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IFOP. 1966. La pesca de centolla en la provincia de Magallanes. 7 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  23. IFOP. 1971. Diagnóstico del sector pesquero Provincia de Magallanes. 23 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  24. IFOP. 1980. Informe de proyecto, Manejo de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la XII Región, Primera etapa 1979. 43 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  25. IFOP, 1981. Informe de proyecto, Manejo de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la XII Región, segunda etapa 1980. 51 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  26. IFOP. 1982. Informe de proyecto, Manejo de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la XII Región, tercera etapa 1981. 78 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  27. IFOP. 1983. Informe de proyecto, Manejo de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la XII Región, cuarta etapa, 1982. 86 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  28. IFOP. 1984. Informe de proyecto, Manejo de las pesquerías de centolla y centollón de la XII Región, quinta etapa, 1983. 42 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  29. IFOP. 1985. Diagnóstico bio-pesquero de la centolla XII Región. 62 P. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  30. IFOP. 1986. Diagnóstico bio-pesquero de la centolla XII Región, 1985. 150 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  31. IFOP. 1987. Diagnóstico bio-pesquero de la centolla XII Región, 1986. 145 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  32. IFOP. 1988. Diagnóstico bio-pesquero de la centolla XII Región, 1987. 50 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  33. IFOP. 1999. Análisis bioeconómico de la pesquería de la centolla en la XII Región. 149 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  34. IFOP. 2004. Estudio biológico-pesquero de centolla y centollón en la XII Región. 349 p. Available at http://ifopprimotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=56IFOP.
  35. Isaacs, Moenieba, and Emma Witbooi. 2019. Fisheries crime, human rights and small-scale fisheries in South Africa: a case of bigger fish to fry. Marine Policy 105: 158–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jarvis, Lovell S., and James E. Wilen. 2014. The Political Economy of the Chilean Nearshore Fisheries. Currents of Change. Prospects for Rights-Based Reform of Fisheries in Developing Country Economies. 37 p. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fec5/36a89b7ddd81d1a7b57b1b9330d1fd075a41.pdf.
  37. Jones, Peter. 2013. A governance analysis of the Galápagos Marine Reserve. Marine Policy 41. Pergamon: 65–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leal, Daniel. 2010. De lo legal a lo cultural : reconceptualización de los pescadores artesanales en el centro-sur de chile . El caso de la desemboadura del río Valdivia. In VII Congreso Chileno de Antropología. Colegio de Antropólogos de Chile A. G, San Pedro de Atacama, 420–436. Dirección.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-65682010000300006.
  39. Luomba, Joseph, Ratana Chuenpagdee, and Andrew M. Song. 2016. A bottom-up understanding of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing in Lake Victoria. Sustainability 8: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch, Michael J., Kimberly L. Barrett, Paul B. Stretesky, and Michael A. Long. 2016. The weak probability of punishment for environmental offenses and deterrence of environmental offenders: a discussion based on USEPA Criminal Cases, 1983–2013, Deviant Behavior. 37. Routledge: 1095–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1161455.
  41. Mahoney, James. 2001. Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 111–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Manach, Le, Charlotte Gough Frédéric, Alasdair Harris, Frances Humber, Sarah Harper, and Dirk Zeller. 2012. Unreported fishing, hungry people and political turmoil: the recipe for a food security crisis in Madagascar? Marine Policy 36. Pergamon: 218–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2011.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martinic, Mateo. 1999. Magallanes Magallanes brings about an interesting social Orígenes el origen pretxrupación amplia inmigratorio general en Magallanes Magallanes. UMAG, Punta Arenas 4: 27–47.Google Scholar
  44. Mellado, María Amalia, Gustavo Blanco-Wells, Laura Nahuelhual, and Gonzalo Saavedra. 2019. Livelihood trajectories in the Chilean Patagonian region: an ethnographic approach to coastal and marine socioecological change. Regional Environmental Change 19: 205–217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1398-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, Denzil G.M., Natasha M. Slicer, and Eugene Sabourenkov. 2014. An action framework to address Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs 6. Taylor & Francis: 70–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2014.912575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ministerio de Economia Fomento y Turismo. 2019. Moderniza y Fortalece el Ejercicio de la Función Pública del Servicio Nacional de Pesca. Ley 21130. Chile. Available at http://www.subpesca.cl/portal/615/articles-103088_documento.pdf.
  47. Morales, María Fernanda. 2018. The effects of globalization on artisanal fisheries in the Magellan and Chilean Antarctic Region. Master Thesis Msc International Development Studies (research), University of Amsterdam, Graduate School of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  48. Morales, Héctor L., and Lincoln Gezan. 1986. La modernización de las pesquerías chilenas. Impactos sociales y ecológicos. Ambiente y Desarrollo 2 (2): 33–46.Google Scholar
  49. Nahuelhual, Laura, Gonzalo Saavedra, Gustavo Blanco, Esmee Wesselink, Gonzalo Campos, and Ximena Vergara. 2018. On super fishers and black capture: Images of illegal fishing in artisanal fisheries of southern Chile. Marine Policy 95. Elsevier Ltd: 36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nahuelhual, Laura, Omar Defeo, Ximena Vergara, Gustavo Blanco, Sandra L. Marín, and Fabio Bozzeda. 2019. Is there a blue transition underway? Fish and Fisheries: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12354.
  51. Oellana, Alejandro, and María Macarena Díaz. Las Caletas de Chile: Integración urbana y prevalencia de sus valores patrimoniales. El caso de la bahía de Coquimbo. Revista de Urbanismo 34 (2016): 55-72Google Scholar
  52. Pedroza, Carmen. 2013. Middlemen, informal trading and its linkages with IUU fishing activities in the port of Progreso, Mexico. Marine Policy 39. Pergamon: 135–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.10.011.
  53. Peña-Torres, Julio. 1997. The Political Economy of Fishing Regulation: The Case of Chile. Marine Resource Economics 253: 14–15.  https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.12.4.42629203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Potter, Nancy Nyquist. 2012. Mad, bad, or virtuous? The moral, cultural, and pathologizing features of defiance. Theory & Psychology 22: 23–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310385746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramirez, V. 1998. Grupo Gala, Estudio de un poblamiento espontáneo en el litoral norte de la XI Región. Memoria de Título, Pedagogía en Historia y Geografía, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción.Google Scholar
  56. Ricks, Jacob I., and Amy H. Liu. 2018. Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide. PS - Political Science and Politics 51: 842–846.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saldívar, Juan Manuel. 2018. Etnografía de la nostalgia: migración transnacional de comunidades chilotas en Punta Arenas (Chile) y Río Gallegos (Argentina). Chungará: 00–00.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-73562018005001201.
  58. Satria, Fayakun, Lilis Sadiyah, Agustinus Anung Widodo, Chris Wilcox, Jessica H. Ford, and Britta Denise Hardesty. 2018. Characterizing transhipment at-sea activities by longline and purse seine fisheries in response to recent policy changes in Indonesia. Marine Policy 95. Pergamon:: 8–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2018.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. SERNAPESCA. 2017. Fiscalización en Pesca y Acuicultura. Informe de Actividades. 2016. 63 p. Available at http://www.sernapesca.cl/sites/default/files/informe_2016.pdf.
  60. Skewes, Juan C., Ricardo Álvarez, and Magdalena Navarro. 2012. Usos consuetudinarios, conflictos actuales y conservación en el borde costero de Chiloé insular. Magallania 40: 109–125.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-22442012000100006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Song, Andrew M., Hekia Bodwitch, and Joeri Scholtens. 2018. Why marginality persists in a governable fishery—the case of New Zealand. Maritime Studies 17: 285–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0121-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steneck, R.S., T.P. Hughes, J.E. Cinner, W.N. Adger, S.N. Arnold, F. Berkes, S.A. Boudreau, K. Brown, C. Folke, L. Gunderson, P. Olsson, M. Scheffer, E. Stephenson, B. Walker, J. Wilson, and B. Worm. 2011. Creation of a gilded trap by the high economic value of the Maine lobster fishery. Conservation Biology 25: 904–912.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01717.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. SUBPESCA. 2016. Plan de Manejo de la Pesquería de la Merluza Común. 56 p. Available at http://www.subpesca.cl/portal/616/articles-93150_documento.pdf.
  64. Sumaila, Ussif R., Jackie Alder, and Heather Keith. 2006. Global scope and economics of illegal fishing. Marine Policy 30: 696–703.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2005.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tidball, Keith G. 2016. Traps in and of our minds: relationships between human logic, dialectical traps and social-ecological traps. Sustainability Science 11. Springer Japan: 867–876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0396-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Urbina, Burgos Rodolfo. 1988. Chiloé, foco de emigraciones. Terra Nostra 12, 31–46. Santiago: Instituto de Investigaciones del Patrimonio Territorial de Chile, Universidad de Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
  67. Von Essen, Erica, Hans Peter Hansen, Helena Nordström Källström, M. Nils Peterson, and Tarla Rai Peterson. 2014. Deconstructing the poaching phenomenon. British Journal of Criminology 54: 632–651.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zúñiga, Sergio, Pamela Ramírez, and Marcelo Valdebenito. 2010. Medición de los impactos socio-económicos de las Áreas de Manejo en las comunidades de pescadores del norte de Chile. Latin american journal of aquatic research 38: 15–26.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-560X2010000100002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigación en Dinámica de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas LatitudesUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  2. 2.Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y AdministrativasUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  3. 3.Instituto de Estudios AntropológicosUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  4. 4.Doctorado en Ecosistemas Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos NaturalesUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile

Personalised recommendations