Advertisement

Alaska’s Next Generation of Potential Fishermen: a Survey of Youth Attitudes Towards Fishing and Community in Bristol Bay and the Kodiak Archipelago

  • Jesse Coleman
  • Courtney Carothers
  • Rachel Donkersloot
  • Danielle Ringer
  • Paula Cullenberg
  • Alexandra Bateman
Research

Abstract

Commercial fishery participants in Alaska are increasing in age, and the next generation of fishermen faces numerous, complex barriers to entry into the industry. Although these barriers are now widely recognized, what remains to be seen is whether or not the youngest generation of coastal residents will choose place-based fishing livelihoods. In this study, we surveyed seventh through 12th grade students in the fishery-dependent Bristol Bay and Kodiak Archipelago regions of Alaska to explore what factors best predict students’ attitudes about commercial fishing and their communities. We used multinomial logit models of Likert-scale responses predicted by geographic, demographic, and social variables, as well as conditional inference trees to understand the direction, magnitude, and importance of the relationships among the predictor and response variables. Positive attitudes about fishing were best predicted by student experience in the commercial fishing industry, whether the student wanted to be involved in fishing in the future, and the importance of subsistence fishing to the student’s family. Age, how the student felt about their life, the importance of subsistence activities, and whether the student grew up in the community in which they were surveyed were all strongly related to the student’s positive attitude about their community. Youth surveyed in this study were highly uncertain about their futures, but key periods of exposure through community and family ties to fishing emerged as important mechanisms for engagement among the next generation of potential fishermen.

Keywords

Commercial fisheries Rural youth Alaska Barriers to entry Fishery-dependent communities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

First and foremost, we would like to thank the student participants for their willingness to share their thoughts and opinions in this survey. We appreciate the support of the administration and staff of the Kodiak Island Borough School District, the Lake and Peninsula Borough School District, the Bristol Bay Borough School District, the Dillingham City School District, and the Southwest Region School District that made this research possible. We would also like to thank Meghan Rearden for her help in administering the survey to students in Kokhanok.

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by the North Pacific Research Board (Project No. 1323) and Alaska Sea Grant (Project No. R/32-06). Research was conducted under the University of Alaska Fairbanks IRB approval 555479-10.

References

  1. Alaska Department of Commerce Community and Economic Development (ADCCED). 2017. Alaska Community Database Online.Google Scholar
  2. Alaska Native Heritage Center. 2011. Unangax & Alutiiq (Sugpiaq) cultures of Alaska. http://www.alaskanative.net/en/main-nav/education-and-programs/cultures-of-alaska/unangax-and-alutiiq/. Accessed November 28, 2017.
  3. Alden, Robin, and Jennifer F. Brewer. 2000. Apprenticeship and conservation initiatives. In International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade IIFET 2000. Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  4. Apgar-Kurtz, Breena. 2015. Factors affecting local permit ownership in Bristol Bay. Mar Policy 56: 71–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Argent, Neil, and Jim Walmsley. 2008. Rural youth migration trends in Australia: An overview of recent trends and two inland case studies. Geogr Res 46 (2): 139–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008.00505.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjarnason, Thoroddur. 2014. Adolescent migration intentions and population change: A 20-year follow-up of Icelandic communities. Sociol Rural 54 (4): 500–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjarnason, Thoroddur, and Thorolfur Thorlindsson. 2006. Should I stay or should I go? Migration expectations among youth in Icelandic fishing and farming communities. J Rural Stud 22 (3): 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braund, Sarah Jane. 2017. Set the net: The heritage significance of fish camp and wild salmon in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Doctoral dissertation, University of Montana.Google Scholar
  9. Burnham, Kenneth P., and David R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretical approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Byun, Soo-yong, Judith L. Meece, Matthew J. Irvin, and Bryan C. Hutchins. 2012. The role of social capital in educational aspirations of rural youth. Rural Sociol 77 (3): 355–379.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00086.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carothers, Courtney. 2008. Rationalized out: Discourses and realities of fisheries privatization in Kodiak, Alaska. In Enclosing the fisheries: people, places and power. American Fisheries Society Symposium.Google Scholar
  12. Carothers, Courtney. 2010. Tragedy of commodification: Displacements in Alutiiq fishing communities in the Gulf of Alaska. Maritime Studies 9 (2): 95–120.Google Scholar
  13. Carothers, Courtney. 2011. Equity and access to fishing rights: Exploring the community quota program in the Gulf of Alaska. Hum Organ 70 (3): 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carothers, Courtney. 2015. Fisheries privatization, social transitions, and well-being in Kodiak, Alaska. Mar Policy 61: 313–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.11.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carr, Patrick J., and Maria J. Kefalas. 2009. The rural brain drain. Chron High Educ 9: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clay, Patricia M., and Julia Olson. 2008. Defining “fishing communities”: vulnerability and the magnuson-stevens fishery conservation and management act. Human Ecology Review 15 (2): 143.Google Scholar
  17. Corbett, Michael. 2005. Rural education and out-migration: The case of a coastal community. Can J Educ 28 (1): 52–72.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1602153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corbett, Michael. 2013. “I’m going to make sure I’m ready before I leave”: The complexity of educational and mobility decision-making in a Canadian coastal community. J Rural Stud 32 (1): 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cortina, Jose M. 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 78 (1): 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cullenberg, Paula, Courtney Carothers, Rachel Donkersloot, Jesse Coleman, and Danielle Ringer. 2017. Turning the tide: How can Alaska address the ‘graying of the fleet’ and loss of rural fisheries access? Anchorage: University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  21. Donkersloot, Rachel. 2007. Youth emigration and reasons to stay: Linking demographic and ecological change in Bristol Bay, Alaska. In Alaska’s fishing communities: Harvesting the future, ed. Paula Cullenberg. Anchorage: Alaska Sea Grant College Program.Google Scholar
  22. Donkersloot, Rachel. 2010. “Now hold on, my attachment to this place is home. That’s it.”: The politics of place and identity in an Irish fishing locale. Maritime Studies 9 (2): 31–52.Google Scholar
  23. Donkersloot, Rachel, and Courtney Carothers. 2016. The graying of the Alaskan fishing fleet. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 58 (3): 30–42.Google Scholar
  24. Donkersloot, Rachel, and Charles Menzies. 2015. Place-based fishing livelihoods and the global ocean: The Irish pelagic fleet at home and abroad. Maritime Studies 14 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fall, James A., Robert J. Walker, Ronald T. Stanek, William E. Simeone, L. Hutchinson-Scarbrough, Philippa Coiley-Kenner, L. Williams et al. 2006. Update of the status of subsistence uses in Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Area communities, 2003, ed. James A. Fall. Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence.Google Scholar
  26. Gho, M., and C. Farrington. 2017. Changes in the distribution of Alaska’s commercial fisheries entry permits, 1975–2016. Juneau: Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Glendinning, Anthony, Mark Nuttall, Leo Hendry, Marion Kloep, and Sheila Wood. 2003. Rural communities and well-being: A good place to grow up? Sociol Rev 51 (1): 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton, Lawrence C., and Carole L. Seyfrit. 1993. Town-village contrasts in Alaskan youth aspirations. Arctic 46 (3): 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hébert, Karen. 2015. Enduring capitalism: Instability, precariousness, and cycles of change in an Alaskan salmon fishery. Am Anthropol 117 (1): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Himes-Cornell, Amber, and Kristin Hoelting. 2015. Resilience strategies in the face of short-and long-term change: Out-migration and fisheries regulation in Alaskan fishing communities. Ecol Soc 20 (2): 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holen, Davin. 2009. The dynamic context of cultural and social sustainability of communities in Southwest Alaska. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 3 (3): 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holen, Davin. 2014. Fishing for community and culture: The value of fisheries in rural Alaska. Polar Record 50 (04): 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. H.R. 2079. 2017. Young Fishermen’s Development Act. US House of Representatives, 115th Congress.Google Scholar
  34. Knapp, Gunnar. 2011. Local permit ownership in Alaska salmon fisheries. Mar Policy 35 (5): 658–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Langdon, Steve J. 1980. Transfer patterns in Alaskan limited entry fisheries: Final report for the limited entry study group of the Alaska State Legislature.Google Scholar
  36. Lowe, Marie E., Meghan Wilson, Robyn Miller, and Kate Sanders. 2012. Alaska coastal community youth and the future. Report prepared for the Alaska Sea Grant College Program. Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. Lowe, Marie E. 2015. Localized practices and globalized futures: Challenges for Alaska coastal community youth. Maritime Studies 14 (1): 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-015-0024-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lumley, Thomas. 2011. Complex surveys: A guide to analysis using R. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, Stephanie. 2012. Cultural continuity and communities and well-being. Journal of Rural and Community Development 7 (1): 74–92.Google Scholar
  40. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2017. 2015 commercial fishery landings by port ranked by dollars. NMFS Commercial Fishery Statistics: Annual Landings. https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/pls/webpls/MF_LPORT_YEARD.RESULTS. Accessed 6 November 2017.
  41. Olson, Julia. 2011. Understanding and contextualizing social impacts from the privatization of fisheries: An overview. Ocean and Coastal Management 54 (5): 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Panelli, Ruth. 2002. Young rural lives: Strategies beyond diversity. J Rural Stud 18 (2): 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petterson, John S. 1983. Policy and culture - the Bristol Bay Case. J Coast Zone Manag 10 (4): 313–330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08920758309361926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poppel, Birger. 2006. Interdependency of subsistence and market economies in the Arctic. In The Economy of the North, ed. Solveig Glomsrød and Julie Aslaksen, 65–80. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  45. Power, Nicole G., Moss E. Norman, and Kathryne Dupré. 2014. “The fishery went away”: The impacts of long-term fishery closures on young people’s experience and perception of fisheries employment in Newfoundland coastal communities. Ecol Soc 19 (3): 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  47. Reedy-Maschner, Katherine. 2009. Entangled livelihoods: Economic integration and diversity in the Western Arctic. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 7 (2): 135–146.Google Scholar
  48. Reedy-Maschner, Katherine L. 2007. The best-laid plans: Limited entry permits and limited entry systems in eastern Aleut culture. Hum Organ 66 (2): 210–225.  https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.66.2.97231040w8jt857n. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rérat, Patrick. 2014. The selective migration of young graduates: Which of them return to their rural home region and which do not? J Rural Stud 35: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Revelle, William. 2007. Experimental approaches to the study of personality. In Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, ed. R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, and R.F. Krueger, 37–61. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rizopoulos, Dimitris. 2006. ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response analysis. J Stat Softw 17 (5): 25.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. S. 1323. 2017. Young Fishermen’s Development Act. US Senate, 115th Congress.Google Scholar
  53. Schafft, Kai, and Catharine Biddle. 2015. Opportunity, ambivalence, and youth perspectives on community change in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale region. Hum Organ 74 (1): 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tavakol, Mohsen, and Reg Dennick. 2011. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2: 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. US Census Bureau. 2016. DP05 - ACS demographic and housing estimates. 2011-2015 American community survey 5-year estimates. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 15 December 2016.
  56. US Census Bureau. 2017. DP-1 - profile of general population and housing characteristics: 2010. Decennial Census. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 12 November 2017.
  57. van Buuren, Stef, and Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn. 2011. Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45 (3): 67.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White, Carole Sandrine. 2015. Getting into fishing: Recruitment and social resilience in north Norfolk’s ‘Cromer Crab’ fishery, UK. Sociol Rural 55 (3): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Fisheries and Ocean SciencesUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.College of Fisheries and Ocean SciencesUniversity of Alaska FairbanksAnchorageUSA
  3. 3.Alaska Marine Conservation CouncilAnchorageUSA
  4. 4.University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  5. 5.Alaska Sea GrantAnchorageUSA
  6. 6.National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAlaska Fisheries Science CenterKodiakUSA

Personalised recommendations