Alaska’s Next Generation of Potential Fishermen: a Survey of Youth Attitudes Towards Fishing and Community in Bristol Bay and the Kodiak Archipelago
- 144 Downloads
Commercial fishery participants in Alaska are increasing in age, and the next generation of fishermen faces numerous, complex barriers to entry into the industry. Although these barriers are now widely recognized, what remains to be seen is whether or not the youngest generation of coastal residents will choose place-based fishing livelihoods. In this study, we surveyed seventh through 12th grade students in the fishery-dependent Bristol Bay and Kodiak Archipelago regions of Alaska to explore what factors best predict students’ attitudes about commercial fishing and their communities. We used multinomial logit models of Likert-scale responses predicted by geographic, demographic, and social variables, as well as conditional inference trees to understand the direction, magnitude, and importance of the relationships among the predictor and response variables. Positive attitudes about fishing were best predicted by student experience in the commercial fishing industry, whether the student wanted to be involved in fishing in the future, and the importance of subsistence fishing to the student’s family. Age, how the student felt about their life, the importance of subsistence activities, and whether the student grew up in the community in which they were surveyed were all strongly related to the student’s positive attitude about their community. Youth surveyed in this study were highly uncertain about their futures, but key periods of exposure through community and family ties to fishing emerged as important mechanisms for engagement among the next generation of potential fishermen.
KeywordsCommercial fisheries Rural youth Alaska Barriers to entry Fishery-dependent communities
First and foremost, we would like to thank the student participants for their willingness to share their thoughts and opinions in this survey. We appreciate the support of the administration and staff of the Kodiak Island Borough School District, the Lake and Peninsula Borough School District, the Bristol Bay Borough School District, the Dillingham City School District, and the Southwest Region School District that made this research possible. We would also like to thank Meghan Rearden for her help in administering the survey to students in Kokhanok.
Funding for this research was provided by the North Pacific Research Board (Project No. 1323) and Alaska Sea Grant (Project No. R/32-06). Research was conducted under the University of Alaska Fairbanks IRB approval 555479-10.
- Alaska Department of Commerce Community and Economic Development (ADCCED). 2017. Alaska Community Database Online.Google Scholar
- Alaska Native Heritage Center. 2011. Unangax & Alutiiq (Sugpiaq) cultures of Alaska. http://www.alaskanative.net/en/main-nav/education-and-programs/cultures-of-alaska/unangax-and-alutiiq/. Accessed November 28, 2017.
- Alden, Robin, and Jennifer F. Brewer. 2000. Apprenticeship and conservation initiatives. In International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade IIFET 2000. Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
- Braund, Sarah Jane. 2017. Set the net: The heritage significance of fish camp and wild salmon in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Doctoral dissertation, University of Montana.Google Scholar
- Burnham, Kenneth P., and David R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretical approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Carothers, Courtney. 2008. Rationalized out: Discourses and realities of fisheries privatization in Kodiak, Alaska. In Enclosing the fisheries: people, places and power. American Fisheries Society Symposium.Google Scholar
- Carothers, Courtney. 2010. Tragedy of commodification: Displacements in Alutiiq fishing communities in the Gulf of Alaska. Maritime Studies 9 (2): 95–120.Google Scholar
- Clay, Patricia M., and Julia Olson. 2008. Defining “fishing communities”: vulnerability and the magnuson-stevens fishery conservation and management act. Human Ecology Review 15 (2): 143.Google Scholar
- Cullenberg, Paula, Courtney Carothers, Rachel Donkersloot, Jesse Coleman, and Danielle Ringer. 2017. Turning the tide: How can Alaska address the ‘graying of the fleet’ and loss of rural fisheries access? Anchorage: University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
- Donkersloot, Rachel. 2007. Youth emigration and reasons to stay: Linking demographic and ecological change in Bristol Bay, Alaska. In Alaska’s fishing communities: Harvesting the future, ed. Paula Cullenberg. Anchorage: Alaska Sea Grant College Program.Google Scholar
- Donkersloot, Rachel. 2010. “Now hold on, my attachment to this place is home. That’s it.”: The politics of place and identity in an Irish fishing locale. Maritime Studies 9 (2): 31–52.Google Scholar
- Donkersloot, Rachel, and Courtney Carothers. 2016. The graying of the Alaskan fishing fleet. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 58 (3): 30–42.Google Scholar
- Fall, James A., Robert J. Walker, Ronald T. Stanek, William E. Simeone, L. Hutchinson-Scarbrough, Philippa Coiley-Kenner, L. Williams et al. 2006. Update of the status of subsistence uses in Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Area communities, 2003, ed. James A. Fall. Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence.Google Scholar
- Gho, M., and C. Farrington. 2017. Changes in the distribution of Alaska’s commercial fisheries entry permits, 1975–2016. Juneau: Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission.Google Scholar
- H.R. 2079. 2017. Young Fishermen’s Development Act. US House of Representatives, 115th Congress.Google Scholar
- Langdon, Steve J. 1980. Transfer patterns in Alaskan limited entry fisheries: Final report for the limited entry study group of the Alaska State Legislature.Google Scholar
- Lowe, Marie E., Meghan Wilson, Robyn Miller, and Kate Sanders. 2012. Alaska coastal community youth and the future. Report prepared for the Alaska Sea Grant College Program. Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Lumley, Thomas. 2011. Complex surveys: A guide to analysis using R. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Martin, Stephanie. 2012. Cultural continuity and communities and well-being. Journal of Rural and Community Development 7 (1): 74–92.Google Scholar
- National Marine Fisheries Service. 2017. 2015 commercial fishery landings by port ranked by dollars. NMFS Commercial Fishery Statistics: Annual Landings. https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/pls/webpls/MF_LPORT_YEARD.RESULTS. Accessed 6 November 2017.
- Poppel, Birger. 2006. Interdependency of subsistence and market economies in the Arctic. In The Economy of the North, ed. Solveig Glomsrød and Julie Aslaksen, 65–80. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Reedy-Maschner, Katherine. 2009. Entangled livelihoods: Economic integration and diversity in the Western Arctic. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 7 (2): 135–146.Google Scholar
- Reedy-Maschner, Katherine L. 2007. The best-laid plans: Limited entry permits and limited entry systems in eastern Aleut culture. Hum Organ 66 (2): 210–225. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.66.2.97231040w8jt857n. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Revelle, William. 2007. Experimental approaches to the study of personality. In Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, ed. R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, and R.F. Krueger, 37–61. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- S. 1323. 2017. Young Fishermen’s Development Act. US Senate, 115th Congress.Google Scholar
- US Census Bureau. 2016. DP05 - ACS demographic and housing estimates. 2011-2015 American community survey 5-year estimates. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 15 December 2016.
- US Census Bureau. 2017. DP-1 - profile of general population and housing characteristics: 2010. Decennial Census. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 12 November 2017.