Advertisement

Maritime Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Working together in small-scale fisheries: harnessing collective action for poverty eradication

  • Svein Jentoft
  • Maarten Bavinck
  • Enrique Alonso-Población
  • Anna Child
  • Antonio Diegues
  • Daniela Kalikoski
  • John Kurien
  • Patrick McConney
  • Paul Onyango
  • Susana Siar
  • Vivienne Solis Rivera
Research
  • 164 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Empowering small-scale fishers to eradicate rural poverty

Abstract

This paper builds on lessons learned from case studies of organization-building and collective action as a means of eradicating poverty in small-scale fisheries. The Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, endorsed by FAO Member States in 2014, recognize that addressing poverty depends in large measure upon the collective agency of small-scale fishers and fish workers themselves. We first discuss the nature of poverty in small-scale fisheries and argue that lack of rights and debilitating power relations are among the factors contributing to poverty. Secondly, the paper explores the possibilities of collective action and suggests that the support—but not the domination—of government and civil society is crucial. Finally, we look into the characteristics of fisher and fish worker organizations and emphasize the importance of autonomous decision making, and the need to address internal obstacles and opportunities, including those related to gender.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper originated from the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) project “Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries – Towards the formulation of a capacity development program on poverty eradication and collective action in small-scale fisheries.” The first project workshop was held in Barbados on 4–6 November 2014, organized by the Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies of The University of West Indies. The paper was also discussed at the MARE conference in 2015 in Amsterdam, and at FAO on 16–18 November 2016 in Rome, Italy. The authors thank FAO for supporting the development of this work. Svein Jentoft also wants to acknowledge the support of the Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) global small-scale fisheries research network.

References

  1. Acheson, J.M. 1981. Anthropology of fishing. Annual Review of Anthropology 10: 275–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire, S. 2008. Multidimensional poverty measures. Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/Alkire_Multidimensional_Poverty.ppt.Google Scholar
  3. Alonso-Población, E. 2014. O mar é femia. Riesgo y trabajo entre los pescadores de una villa costera gallega. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.Google Scholar
  4. Alonso-Población, E., and A. Fidalgo-Castro. 2014. Webs of legitimacy and discredit: narrative capital and politics of ritual in a Timor-Leste community. Anthropological Forum 24 (3): 245–266.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2014.948381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alonso-Población, E., Siar, S.V. 2018. Women’s participation and leadership in fisherfolk organizations and collective action in fisheries: a review of evidence on enablers, drivers and barriers. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1159. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  6. Alonso-Población, E., Rodrigues, P., Wilson, C., Pereira, M. & Lee, R.U. 2018. Narrative assemblages for power-balanced coastal and marine governance. Tara Bandu as a tool for community-based fisheries co-management in Timor-Leste. Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Amarasinghe, O., and M. Bavinck. 2017. Furthering the implementation of the SSF guidelines: Strengthening fisheries cooperatives in Sri Lanka. In The small-scale fisheries guidelines: Global implementation, ed. S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M.J. Barragán Paladines, and N. Franz. Dorendrecht: Springer Publ.Google Scholar
  8. Baland, J.M., P. Bardhan, and S. Bowles, eds. 2006. Inequality, cooperation and environmental sustainability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bavinck, M. 2006. Don’t be hasty and impetuous—notes on women in fisheries. Samudra 43: 3–5.Google Scholar
  10. Bavinck, M. 2011. Wealth, poverty, and immigration—the role of institutions in the fisheries of Tamil Nadu, India. In Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 173–191. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bavinck, M. 2014. Investigating poverty through the lens of riches—immigration and segregation in Indian capture fisheries. Development Policy Review 32 (1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bavinck, M., and J. Gupta. 2014. Pluralism in freshwater and marine governance: a challenge fir earth system governance, architecture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 11: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bavinck, M. & Vivekanandan, V. (2017). Qualities of self-governance and wellbeing in the fishing communities of northern Tamil Nadu, India—the role of Pattinavar ur panchayats. Maritime Studies, 16:16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0070-8.
  14. Bavinck, M., F. Berkes, A. Charles, C. Esteves Dias, P. Nauak, and M. Sowman. 2017. The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation—a global reconnaissance. Maritime Studies (MAST) 16: 8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0062-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benda-Beckmann, F., K. von Benda-Beckmann, and A. Griffiths. 2009. The power of law in a transnational world. New York: Berghan Press.Google Scholar
  16. Béné, C. 2003. When fishery rhymes with poverty: a first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Development 31 (6): 949–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Béné, C., and R.M. Friend. 2011. Poverty in small-scale fisheries: old issue, new analysis. Progress in Development Studies 11 (2).  https://doi.org/10.1177/146499341001100203.
  18. Béné, C., Devereux, S & Roelen, K. 2015. Social Protection and sustainable natural resources management: initial findings and good practices from small-scale fisheries. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular. No 1106. Rome. FAO.Google Scholar
  19. Bennet, N.J., T.S. Whitty, E. Finkbeiner, J. Pittman, H. Bassett, S. Gelcich, and E.H. Allison. 2018. Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management 61: 597–614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bennett, N.J., H. Govan, and T. Satterfield. 2015. Ocean grabbing. Marine Policy 57: 61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993410011002032015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B.J. McCay, and J.M. Acheson. 1989. The benefits of the commons. Nature 340 (6229): 91–93.  https://doi.org/10.1038/340091a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Berkes, F., T.P. Hughes, R.S. Stenech, J.A. Wilson, D.R. Bellwood, B. Crona, C. Folke, L.H. Gunderson, and H.M. Leslie. 2006. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311 (5767): 1557–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Child, A. (this thematic series) 2018. Beyond the cooperative: How innovative collective action saved livelihoods, culture and tourism in Ocracoke, North Carolina, USA. Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Campling, L., E. Havice, and P. McCall-Howard. 2012. The political economy and ecology of capture Fisheries: market dynamics, resource access and relations of exploitation and resistance. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (2 and 3): 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carmona Badía, J. 1994. Recursos, organización y tecnología en el crecimiento de la industria española de conservas de pescado, Edited by J. Nadal & J. Catalán, La cara oculta de la industrialización en España. La modernización de los sectores no líderes (siglos XIX y XX), 127–162, Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  26. Chuenpagdee, R., P. Degnbol, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, D. Johnson, R. Pullin, and S. Williams. 2005. Challenges and concerns in capture fisheries and aquaculture. In Fish for life—interactive governance for fisheries, ed. J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, and R. Pullin, 25–37. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Cordell, J. (Ed.) 1989. A sea of small boats. Cultural Survival Report 26. Cambridge: Cultural Survival Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Delaney, A.E. 2015. Japanese fishing cooperative associations: Governance in an era of consolidation. In Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries: Global reflections, ed. S. Jentoft and R. Chuenpagdee, 263–280. Dordrecht: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. DuBois, C., and C. Zografos. 2012. Conflicts at sea between artisanal and industrial fishers: inter-sectoral interactions and dispute resolution in Senegal. Marine Policy 36 (6): 1211–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eide, A., M. Bavinck, and J. Raakjær. 2011. Avoiding poverty: Distributing wealth in fisheries. In Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 13–26. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FAO. 2002. Report of the Sustainable Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (GCP/INT/735/UK) and FAO Advisory Committee on Fisheries Research Joint Working Party on Poverty in Small-Scale Fisheries. Promoting the Contribution of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries in Poverty Alleviation. Rome, 10–12 April 2002. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 678. Rome.Google Scholar
  32. FAO. 2012. The voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of National Food Security. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  33. FAO. 2015. Towards the implementation of the SSF Guidelines in the Southeast Asia region. Proceedings of the Southeast Asia Regional Consultation Workshop on the Implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, Bali, Indonesia, 24–27 August 2015, Rome, Italy. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 42. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  34. FAO. 2016. Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries: Towards the formulation of a capacity development programme, Workshop report and case studies, Barbados, 4–6 November 2014, edited by Susana V. Siar and Daniela Kalikoski. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 41. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  35. Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frangoudes, K., B. Marugán-Pintos, and J.J. Pascual-Fernández. 2008. From open access to co-governance and conservation: the case of women shellfish collectors in Galicia (Spain). Marine Policy 32 (2): 223–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fröcklin, S., M. De la Torre-Castro, L. Lindström, and N.S. Jiddawi. 2013. Fish traders as key actors in fisheries: gender and adaptive management. AMBIO 42: 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. George, A., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gupta, J., N.R.M. Pouw, and M.A.F. Ros-Tonen. 2014. Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gyader, O., P. Berthou, C. Koutsikopoulos, F. Alban, S. Demanéche, M.B. Gaspar, R. Eschbaum, E. Fahy, O. Tully, L. Reynal, O. Curtil, K. Frangoudes, and F. Maynou. 2013. Small scale fisheries in Europe: a comparative analysis based on a selection of case studies. Fisheries 140: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hardin, R. 1992. Collective action. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Helmsing, A.H.J., and S. Vellema. 2011. Governance, inclusion and embedding. In Value chains, social inclusion and economic development: Contrasting theories and realities, ed. A.H.J. Helmsing and S. Vellema, 1–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Isaacs, M. 2003. Understanding the social processes and politics of implementing a new fisheries policy, the Marine Living Resources Act 19 of 1998, in South Africa. PhD Thesis University of Western Cape.Google Scholar
  45. Islam, M.M., and S. Jentoft. 2017. Addressing disaster risks and climate change in coastal Bangladesh: Using the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines. In The small-scale guidelines: Global implementation, ed. S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M.J. Barragàn-Paladines, and N. Franz, 521–540. Dordrecht: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jentoft, S. 1986. Fisheries co-operatives; lessons drawn from international experiences. Canadian Journal of Development Studies VII (2): 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jentoft, S. 1989. Fisheries co-management: delegating government responsibility to fishermen’s organizations. Marine Policy 137–154.Google Scholar
  48. Jentoft, S. 2013. Social justice in the context of fisheries—A governability challenge. In Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications, ed. M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, and J. Kooiman, 45–66. Dordrecht: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jentoft, S., and A. Eide. 2011. Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jentoft, S. & Finstad, B. (this thematic series) 2018. Building fisheries organizations through collective action in Norway. Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
  51. Jentoft, S., P. Onyango, and M.M. Islam. 2010. Freedom and poverty in the fishery commons. International Journal of the Commons 4 (1): 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson, D. 2006. Category, narrative, and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 30: 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson, D.S., T.G. Acott, N. Stacey, and J. Urquhart, eds. 2017. Social wellbeing and the values of small scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  54. Kalikoski, D., and N. Franz, eds. 2014. Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries. A way forward in implementing the international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  55. Kalikoski, D. C. & Vasconcellos, M. 2012. Case study of the technical, socioeconomic and environmental conditions of small scale fisheries in the estuary of the Patos Lagoon, Brazil: a methodology for assessment. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular. No 1075. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  56. Kleiber, D., L.M. Harris, and A.C. Vincent. 2015. Gender and small-scale fisheries: a case for counting women and beyond. Fish and Fisheries 16 (4): 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kurien, J. 1985. Technical assistance project and socio-economic change. Norwegian intervention in Kerela’s fisheries development. Economic and Political Weekly XX (25–26).Google Scholar
  58. Kurien, J. 1988. The role of fishermen’s organizations in fisheries management of developing countries (with particular reference to the Indo-Pacific region). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 300. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  59. Kurien, J. 2000. The Kerala model: Its central tendency and the outlier. In Kerala: The development experience, ed. G. Parayil. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  60. Kurien, J. 2007. The blessing of the commons: Small-scale fisheries, community property rights and coastal natural assets. In Reclaiming nature: Environmental justice and ecological restoration, ed. J. Boyce, S. Narain, et al. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kurien, J. 2014. Collective action and organizations in small-scale fisheries. In D.C. Kalikoski & N. Franz, eds. 2013. Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries: a way forward in implementing the international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries, FAO Workshop, 18–20, pp. 41–104March, Rome:. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 32. (Also available at www.fao.org/3/a-i3540e.pdf).
  62. Kurien, J. (2017) . Collective action and co-management inititives in post-disaster Aceh, Indonesia. Maritime Studies, 16:21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0075-3
  63. Mathew S. 2005. Fisheries and their contribution to sustainable development. Contribution to Discussion Panel A, 6th Meeting of the United Nations Open-Ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea, 6–10 June 2005.Google Scholar
  64. McConney, P. & Medeiros, R. 2014. Strengthening organizations and collective action in smal-scale fisheries: lessons learned from Brazil and the Caribbean. In Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries: a way forward in implementing the international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries, eds. D.C. Kalikoski and Franz, N. FAO Workshop, 18–20 march 2013, Rome, Italy, pp. 41–104. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 32. Rome, FAO. Also available at www.fao.org/3/a-i3540e.pdf.
  65. McConney, P., R. Medeiros & M. Pena. (Eds.) 2014. Enhancing stewardship in small-scale fisheries: Practices and perspectives. Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) and Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados. CERMES Technical Report No. 73.Google Scholar
  66. McConney, P., Simmons, B., Nicholls, V. & Medeiros Pereira, R. (2017). Building the Barbados National Union of Fisherfolk Organisations. Maritime Studies, 16:19.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0073-5.
  67. Medeiros, R.P., T.Z. Serafini, and P. McConney. 2014. Enhancing ecosystem stewardship in small-scale fisheries: prospects for Latin America and the Caribbean. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 32: 181–191.Google Scholar
  68. Meltzoff, S.K. 1995. Marisquadoras of the shellfish revolution: the rise of women in co-management on Illa de Arousa, Galicia. Journal of Political Ecology 2: 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Michels, R. 2001. Political parties: A sociological study of oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Kitchener: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
  70. Miller, D.L. 2014. Introduction to collective behaviour and collective action. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  71. Olson, M. 1971. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Onyango, P. 2011. Occupation of last resort? Small-scale fishing in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. In Poverty Mosaics. Realities and prospects in small.-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 125–146. Dordrecht: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  73. Onyango, P. (2018). Fisheries co-management: assessing the contribution of beach management units in Lake Victoria, Tanzania to reduce rural poverty. Maritime Studies . Google Scholar
  74. Onyango, P., and S. Jentoft. 2011. Climbing the hill. Women’s social entrepreneurship in Lake Victoria. Maritime Studies (MAST) 10 (2): 117–140.Google Scholar
  75. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ostrom, E. 2001. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pauly, D. 2018. A vision for marine fisheries in a global blue economy. Marine Policy 87: 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ravaillon, M. 2004. Pro-poor growth: A primer. Policy Research Working Paper 3242. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Scholtens, J. 2016. The elusive quest for access and collective action: North Sri Lankan fishers’ thwarted struggles against a foreign trawler fleet. The International Journal of the Commons 10 (2): 929–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schuhbauer, A., R. Chuenpagdee, W.W.L. Cheung, K. Greer, and U.R. Sumaila. 2017. How subsidies affect the economic viability of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 82: 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Scott, J.C. 1987. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sen, A. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. In Poverty and inequality, ed. D.B. Grusky and R. Kanbur. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Sinan, H., and D. Whitmarsh. 2010. Wealth-based fisheries management and resource rent capture: an application to the Maldives marine fisheries. Mar Policy 34 (3): 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. SOFIA. 2016. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  87. Solis Rivera, V., Madrigal Cordeo, P., Chacón Rojas, D. & O’Riordan, B. (2017). Institutions and collective action in a Costa Rican small-scale fisheries cooprrative the case of CoopeTárcoles RL. Maritime Studies 16:22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017.0055-1.
  88. Spicker, P. 1999. Definitions of poverty: Eleven clusters of meaning. In The International Glossary of Poverty, ed. D. Gordon and P. Spicker. London: ZED Books, CROP International Series on Poverty.Google Scholar
  89. Stanford, R.J., B. Wiryawan, D.G. Bengen, and R. Febriamansyah. 2014. Improving livelihoods in fishing communities of Wst Suamatra: more than just boats and machines. Marine Policy 45: 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sundar, A. 2012. Alternatives to crisis: social movements in global fisheries governance. Human Geography 5 (2).Google Scholar
  91. Sunde, J., M. Sowman, H. Smith, and W. Wicomb. 2014. Emerging proposals for tenure governance in small-scale fisheries in South Africa. Land Tenure Journal 1: 117–144.Google Scholar
  92. Tilly, C. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  93. Urquhart, J., T.G. Acott, D. Symes, and M. Zhao, eds. 2014. Social issues in sustainable fisheries management. Dordrecht: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  94. Weeratunge, N., K.A. Snyder, and P.S. Choo. 2010. Gleaner, fisher, trader, processor: understanding gendered employment in fisheries and aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries 11 (4): 405–420.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svein Jentoft
    • 1
  • Maarten Bavinck
    • 1
    • 2
  • Enrique Alonso-Población
    • 3
  • Anna Child
    • 4
  • Antonio Diegues
    • 5
  • Daniela Kalikoski
    • 6
  • John Kurien
    • 7
  • Patrick McConney
    • 8
  • Paul Onyango
    • 9
  • Susana Siar
    • 10
  • Vivienne Solis Rivera
    • 11
  1. 1.Norwegian College of Fishery ScienceUiT-The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of Geography, Planning and International Development StudiesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Anthropology LabSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Products, Trade and Marketing BranchFAORomeItaly
  5. 5.Nupaub-USP University of Sau PauloSão PauloBrazil
  6. 6.Strategic Programme on Rural Poverty ReductionFAORomeItaly
  7. 7.Azim Premji UniversityBangaluruIndia
  8. 8.University of the West IndiesCave Hill CampusBarbados
  9. 9.University of Dar es SalaamDar es SalaamTanzania
  10. 10.Fishing and Operations and Technology BranchFAORomeItaly
  11. 11.CoopeSoliDar, R.L.San JoseCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations