Advertisement

Journal of Advanced Ceramics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 247–255 | Cite as

Influence of test procedure on dielectric breakdown strength of alumina

  • Bjoern MiellerEmail author
Open Access
Research Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Dielectric strength testing of ceramics can be performed with various setups and parameters. Comparisons of results from different sources are often not meaningful, because the results are strongly dependent on the actual testing procedure. The aim of this study is to quantify the influence of voltage ramp rate, electrode size, electrode conditioning, and sample thickness on the measured AC dielectric strength of a commercial alumina. Mean values, Weibull moduli, and failure probabilities determined in standardized short time tests are evaluated and related to withstand voltage tests. Dielectric strength values in the range from 21.6 to 33.2 kV mm−1 were obtained for the same material using different testing procedures. Short time tests resulted in small standard deviations (< 2 kV mm−1) and high Weibull moduli around 30, while withstand tests at voltage levels with low and virtual zero failure probability in short time tests resulted in large scatter of withstand time and Weibull moduli < 1. The strong decrease in Weibull moduli is attributed to progressive damage from partial discharge and depolarization during AC testing. These findings emphasize the necessity of a thorough documentation of testing procedure and highlight the importance of withstand voltage tests for a comprehensive material characterization.

Keywords

dielectric strength dielectric breakdown withstand voltage test high AC voltage testing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author likes to thank W. Guether and J. Biberstein for performing the numerous measurements and S. Benemann (BAM Division 6.1) for SEM analysis.

References

  1. [1]
    Gerson R, Marshall TC. Dielectric breakdown of porous ceramics. J Appl Phys 1959, 30: 1650–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Owate IO, Freer R. AC breakdown characteristics of ceramic materials. J Appl Phys 1992, 72: 2418–2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kishimoto A, Koumoto K, Yanagida H. Mechanical and dielectric failure of BaTiO3 ceramics. J Mater Sci 1989, 24: 698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Kishimoto A, Koumoto K, Yanagida H. Comparison of mechanical and dielectric strength distributions for variously surface-finished titanium dioxide ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1989, 72: 1373–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Young AL, Hilmas GE, Zhang SC, et al. Mechanical vs. electrical failure mechanisms in high voltage, high energy density multilayer ceramic capacitors. J Mater Sci 2007, 42: 5613–5619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Malec D, Bley V, Talbi F, et al. Contribution to the understanding of the relationship between mechanical and dielectric strengths of alumina. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010, 30: 3117–3123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Haddour L, Mesrati N, Goeuriot D, et al. Relationships between microstructure, mechanical and dielectric properties of different alumina materials. J Eur Ceram Soc 2009, 29: 2747–2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Neusel C, Jelitto H, Schmidt D, et al. Thickness-dependence of the breakdown strength: Analysis of the dielectric and mechanical failure. J Eur Ceram Soc 2015, 35: 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hoshina T, Yamazaki M, Takeda H, et al. Dielectric breakdown mechanism of perovskite-structured ceramics. Additional Conferences (Device Packaging, HiTEC, HiTEN, & CICMT) 2015, 2015: 000116–000120.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Touzin M, Goeuriot D, Fitting HJ, et al. Relationships between dielectric breakdown resistance and charge transport in alumina materials—Effects of the microstructure. J Eur Ceram Soc 2007, 27: 1193–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Liebault J, Vallayer J, Goeuriot D, et al. How the trapping of charges can explain the dielectric breakdown performance of alumina ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2001, 21: 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Suo Z. Models for breakdown-resistant dielectric and ferroelectric ceramics. J Mech Phys Solids 1993, 41: 1155–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Schneider GA. A Griffith type energy release rate model for dielectric breakdown under space charge limited conductivity. J Mech Phys Solids 2013, 61: 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Neusel C, Jelitto H, Schneider GA. Electrical conduction mechanism in bulk ceramic insulators at high voltages until dielectric breakdown. J Appl Phys 2015, 117: 154902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Neusel C, Schneider GA. Size-dependence of the dielectric breakdown strength from nano- to millimeter scale. J Mech Phys Solids 2014, 63: 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Fischer PK, Schneider GA. Dielectric breakdown toughness from filament induced dielectric breakdown in borosilicate glass. J Eur Ceram Soc 2018, 38: 4476–4482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Touzin M, Goeuriot D, Guerret-Piécourt C, et al. Alumina based ceramics for high-voltage insulation. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010, 30: 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Fuertes V, Cabrera MJ, Seores J, et al. Hierarchical micro-nanostructured albite-based glass-ceramic for high dielectric strength insulators. J Eur Ceram Soc 2018, 38: 2759–2766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Ye XY, Li YM, Bian JJ. Dielectric and energy storage properties of Mn-doped Ba0.3Sr0.475La0.12Ce0.03TiO3 dielectric ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2017, 37: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Yuan QB, Cui J, Wang YF, et al. Significant enhancement in breakdown strength and energy density of the BaTiO3/BaTiO3@SiO2 layered ceramics with strong interface blocking effect. J Eur Ceram Soc 2017, 37: 4645–4652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Luo BC, Wang XH, Tian EK, et al. Enhanced energy-storage density and high efficiency of lead-free CaTiO3-BiScO3 linear dielectric ceramics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017, 9: 19963–19972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Lei W, Yan YY, Wang XH, et al. Improving the breakdown strength of (Mg0.9Zn0.1)2(Ti1−xMnx)O4 ceramics with low dielectric loss. Ceram Int 2015, 41: 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    ASTM D149-09(2013). Standard test method for dielectric breakdown voltage and dielectric strength of solid electrical insulating materials at commercial power frequencies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division Advanced Technical CeramicsBundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations