Journal of Advanced Ceramics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 238–246 | Cite as

TiO2/WO3 heterogeneous structures prepared by electrospinning and sintering steps: Characterization and analysis of the impedance variation to humidity

  • Evando S. AraújoEmail author
  • Victor N. S. Leão
Open Access
Research Article


Relative humidity (RH) is a critical environmental variable for transportation and storage of products and for the quality guarantee of several other production processes and services. Heterogeneous structures prepared from the selective semiconductor oxides may improve the sensitivity to humidity due to the better electronic and surface properties, when compared to pristine oxides. This work shows an alternative fabrication route for producing titanium dioxide/tungsten trioxide (TiO2/WO3) heterogeneous structures (by electrospinning and sintering) for potential application on the RH detection. The microstructural properties of the materials were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDS), X-ray diffraction, and Raman spectroscopy. The electrical characterization of the structures was performed by electrical impedance spectroscopy in RH range of 10%–100%. Results indicated a p- to n-type conduction transition at around 30%–40% RH for all tested settings. The analysis of the impedance signature to humidity showed that the amount of fiber layers on the electrode and working temperature are important parameters to improve the humidity sensing of the TiO2/WO3 systems.


electrospinning heterogeneous structures preparation relative humidity semiconductors 



The corresponding author would like to thank Drs. Helinando Oliveira, Pedro Faia, Juliano Libardi, and Pedro Dicesar for the technical support. The authors also acknowledge the financial support from National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq -Brazil, Project 202451/2015-1) and Bahia State Research Foundation (FAPESB, Project 1252/2018).


  1. [1]
    Farahani H, Wagiran R, Hamidon MN. Humidity sensors principle, mechanism, and fabrication technologies: A comprehensive review. Sensors 2014, 14: 7881–7939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Araujo ES, da Costa BP, Oliveira RAP, et al. TiO2/ZnO hierarchical heteronanostructures: Synthesis, characterization and application as photo catalysts. J Environ Chem Eng 2016, 4: 2820–2829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Faia PM, Ferreira AJ, Furtado CS. Investigations on humidity sensing properties of thick films of the TiO2: WO3 system. Materials Science Forum 2010, 636–637: 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zhang D, Chang H, Li P, et al. Fabrication and characterization of an ultrasensitive humidity sensor based on metal oxide/graphene hybrid nanocomposite. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2016, 225: 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Zhang D, Liu J, Xia B. Layer-by-layer self-assembly of zinc oxide/graphene oxide hybrid toward ultrasensitive humidity sensing. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2016, 37: 916–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zhang D, Sun Y, Li P, et al. Facile fabrication of MoS2-modified SnO2 hybrid nanocomposite for ultrasensitive humidity sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016, 8: 14142–14149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zhang D, Tong J, Xia B. Humidity-sensing properties of chemically reduced graphene oxide/polymer nanocomposite film sensor based on layer-by-layer nano self-assembly. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2014, 197: 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang D, Tong J, Xia B, et al. Ultrahigh performance humidity sensor based on layer-by-layer self-assembly of graphene oxide/polyelectrolyte nanocomposite film. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2014, 203: 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Faia PM, Jesus EL, Louro CS. TiO2:WO3 composite humidity sensors doped with ZnO and CuO investigated by impedance spectroscopy. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2014, 203: 340–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Faia PM, Libardi J, Louro CS. Effect of V2O5 doping on p-to n-conduction type transition of TiO2:WO3 composite humidity sensors. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2016, 222: 952–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Nascimento MLF, Araujo ES, Cordeiro ER, et al. A literature investigation about electrospinning and nanofibers: Historical trends, current status and future challenges. Recent Pat Nanotech 2015, 9: 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Araújo ES, Libardi J, Faia PM, et al. Humidity-sensing properties of hierarchical TiO2:ZnO composite grown on electrospun fibers. J Mater Sci: Mater El 2017, 28: 16575–16583.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Da Costa FFP, Araújo ES, Nascimento MLF, et al. Electrospun fibers of enteric polymer for controlled drug delivery. Int J Polym Sci 2015, 2015: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Weissman SA, Anderson NG. Design of experiments (DoE) and process optimization. A review of recent publications. Org Process Res Dev 2015, 19: 1605–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Fonoberov VA, Balandin AA. Interface and confined optical phonons in wurtzite nanocrystals. Phys Rev B 2004, 70: 233205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Hearne GR, Zhao J, Dawe AM, et al. Effect of grain size on structural transitions in anataseTiO2: A Raman spectroscopy study at high pressure. Phys Rev B 2004, 70: 134102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sahoo S, Arora AK, Sridharan V. Raman line shapes of optical phonons of different symmetries in anatase TiO2 nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 16927–16933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Horprathum M, Eiamchai P, Chindaudom P, et al. Oxygen partial pressure dependence of the properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by DC reactive magnetron sputtering. Procedia Eng 2012, 32: 676–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Landmann M, Rauls E, Schmidt WG. The electronic structure and optical response of rutile, anatase and brookite TiO2. J Phys: Condens Matter 2012, 24: 195503.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Yang CC, Li S. Size-dependent Raman red shifts of semiconductor nanocrystals. J Phys Chem B 2008, 112: 14193–14197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Su CY, Lin HC, Lin CK. Fabrication and optical properties of Ti-doped W18O49 nanorods using a modified plasma-arc gas-condensation technique. J Vac Sci Technol B 2009, 27: 2170–2174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Fripiat JJ, Jelli A, Poncelet G, et al. Thermodynamic properties of adsorbed water molecules and electrical conduction in montmorillonites and silicas. J Phys Chem 1965, 69: 2185–2197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Anderson JH, Parks GA. Electrical conductivity of silica gel in the presence of adsorbed water. J Phys Chem 1968, 72: 3662–3668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Macdonald JR. Impedance Spectroscopy. New york: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Geng W, Yuan Q, Jiang X, et al. Humidity sensing mechanism of mesoporous MgO/KCl-SiO2 composites analyzed by complex impedance spectra and bode diagrams. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2012, 174: 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Bauerle JE. Study of solid electrolyte polarization by a complex admittance method. J Phys Chem Solids 1969, 30: 2657–2670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Mönch W. Semiconductor Surfaces and Interfaces. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Gurlo A, Sahm M, Oprea A, et al. A p- to n-transition on α-Fe2O3-based thick film sensors studied by conductance and work function change measurements. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2004, 102: 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Bârsan N, Grigorovici R, Ionescu R, et al. Mechanism of gas detection in polycrystalline thick film SnO2 sensors. Thin Solid Films 1989, 171: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Bayhan M, Kavasoğlu N. A study on the humidity sensing properties of ZnCr2O4-K2CrO4 ionic conductive ceramic sensor. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2006, 117: 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Agmon N. The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem Phys Lett 1995, 244: 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Vent-Axia Ecotronic Humidity Sensor. Information on
  35. [35]
    Suri K, Annapoorni S, Sarkar A, et al. Gas and humidity sensors based on iron oxide-polypyrrole nanocomposites. Sensor Actuat B: Chem 2002, 81: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group on Electrospinning and Nanotechnology Applications (GPEA-Nano), Department of Materials ScienceUniversidade Federal do Vale do São FranciscoJuazeiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations