Advertisement

Cervical Ultrasound Utilization in Selective Cervical Nerve Root Injection for the Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain: a Review

  • Reza Ehsanian
  • David J. Kennedy
  • Byron SchneiderEmail author
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (B Schneider, Section Editor)
  • 13 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper aims to review the available literature addressing the safety, accuracy, and efficacy of ultrasound-guided injections for cervical radicular pain.

Recent Findings

Ultrasound-guided injections remain a “partially blind technique” due to the inability to visualize relevant structures and the distribution of injectate. There remains a need for adequately powered studies evaluating the safety, accuracy, and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided steroid injections in the cervical spine. Fluoroscopy remains the best evidence-based image-guidance modality for injections into the cervical epidural space to treat cervical radicular pain.

Summary

If ultrasound guidance is planned for treatment of cervical radicular pain, the authors recommend concomitant use of fluoroscopy guidance. Given the risk of inaccurate needle placement, physicians should retain fluoroscopic images prior to contrast injection to document the proper vertebral segment and final needle tip position. As epidural flow cannot be fully visualized with ultrasound, it is recommended to use fluoroscopy and, if needed, digital subtraction imaging to confirm the absence of intravascular injection. At a minimum, images should be saved post-contrast injection to document epidural flow.

Keywords

Injection Ultrasound guided Fluoroscopic Fluoroscopy Cervical nerve root blocks Selective cervical nerve root block Epidural steroid injection Pain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Heather E. Laferriere, MLIS, Health Sciences Informationist, Eskind Biomedical Library at Vanderbilt University for her help in the database review for relevant literature.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Reza Ehsanian, David Kennedy, and Byron Schneider declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

40141_2019_248_MOESM1_ESM.docx (42 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 42 kb)

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • Lee S-H, Kang CH, Lee S-H, Derby R, Yang SN, Lee JE, et al. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency neurotomy in cervical spine: sonoanatomic study of a new technique in cadavers. Clin Radiol. 2008 ;63(11):1205–12. Cadaveric study assessing the feasibility of cervical facet intra-articular injections. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegenthaler A, Mlekusch S, Trelle S, Schliessbach J, Curatolo M, Eichenberger U. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks of the cervical zygapophysial joints. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(2):347–52.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    • Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate Is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions. Am Stat. 1998;52(2):119–26. Present method term the modified Wald method which is more accurate than the "exact" method of Clopper and Pearson (Biometrika 26:404–413, 1934). Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(2):284–99.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017;358:j3221.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    • Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain J Neurol. 1994;117 (Pt 2):325–35. Epidemiological survey of cervical radiculopathy, presenting duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, the most frequent cervical nerve root involved, median duration of follow up, percentage of patients that underwent surgery, recurrence, predictors to of decision to operate, average annual age-adjusted incidence. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, et al. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):19–24. MRI study of asymptomatic patients to guide in the interpretation of MRI findings in patients with disorders of the cervical spine. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salemi G, Savettieri G, Meneghini F, Di Benedetto ME, Ragonese P, Morgante L, et al. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a door-to-door survey in a Sicilian municipality. Acta Neurol Scand. 1996;93(2–3):184–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenfeld AJ, George AA, Bader JO, Caram PM. Incidence and epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy in the United States military: 2000 to 2009. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(1):17–22.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kondo K, Molgaard CA, Kurland LT, Onofrio BM. Protruded intervertebral cervical disk: incidence and affected cervical level in Rochester, Minnesota, 1950 through 1974. Minn Med. 1981;64(12):751–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehto IJ, Tertti MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, Kormano MJ. Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology. 1994;36(1):49–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(8):1178–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee TH, Kim SJ, Lim SM. Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic korean subjects. Part 2 : cervical spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;53(2):89–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melancia JL, Francisco AF, Antunes JL. Spinal stenosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;119:541–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine. 1996;21(17):2046–52.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    •• Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2014;14(11):2525–45. Provides nomenclature and serves as a system of classification and reporting. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaumard NV, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. J Biomech Eng. 2011;133(7):071010.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall LL, Trethewie ER, Curtain CC. Chemical radiculitis. A clinical, physiological and immunological study. Clin Orthop. 1977;129:61–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saal JS, Franson RC, Dobrow R, Saal JA, White AH, Goldthwaite N. High levels of inflammatory phospholipase A2 activity in lumbar disc herniations. Spine. 1990;15(7):674–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kang JD, Georgescu HI, McIntyre-Larkin L, Stefanovic-Racic M, Evans CH. Herniated cervical intervertebral discs spontaneously produce matrix metalloproteinases, nitric oxide, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin E2. Spine. 1995;20(22):2373–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Furusawa N, Baba H, Miyoshi N, Maezawa Y, Uchida K, Kokubo Y, et al. Herniation of cervical intervertebral disc: immunohistochemical examination and measurement of nitric oxide production. Spine. 2001;26(10):1110–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rothman SM, Winkelstein BA. Cytokine antagonism reduces pain and modulates spinal astrocytic reactivity after cervical nerve root compression. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(8):2563–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    •• Stout A. Epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22(1):149–59. Reviews risks and efficacy of ESIs for cervical radiculopathy. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Risbud MV, Shapiro IM. Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: pain and disc content. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(1):44–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stav A, Ovadia L, Sternberg A, Kaadan M, Weksler N. Cervical epidural steroid injection for cervicobrachialgia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37(6):562–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bush K, Hillier S. Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 1996;5(5):319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saal JS, Saal JA, Yurth EF. Nonoperative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine. 1996;21(16):1877–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stojanovic MP, Vu T-N, Caneris O, Slezak J, Cohen SP, Sang CN. The role of fluoroscopy in cervical epidural steroid injections: an analysis of contrast dispersal patterns. Spine. 2002;27(5):509–14.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kwon JW, Lee JW, Kim SH, Choi J-Y, Yeom J-S, Kim H-J, et al. Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy: effect and prognostic factors. Skelet Radiol. 2007;36(5):431–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fish DE, Kobayashi HW, Chang TL, Pham Q. MRI prediction of therapeutic response to epidural steroid injection in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(3):239–46.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    •• Cohen SP, Hayek S, Semenov Y, Pasquina PF, White RL, Veizi E, et al. Epidural steroid injections, conservative treatment, or combination treatment for cervical radicular pain: a multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness study. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):1045–55. Prospective study investigating ESI. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wei G, Liang J, Chen B, Zhou C, Ru N, Chen J, et al. Comparison of transforaminal verse interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of the literature. Int Orthop. 2016;40(12):2533–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(11):1362–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vallée JN, Feydy A, Carlier RY, Mutschler C, Mompoint D, Vallée CA. Chronic cervical radiculopathy: lateral-approach periradicular corticosteroid injection. Radiology. 2001;218(3):886–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lin EL, Lieu V, Halevi L, Shamie AN, Wang JC. Cervical epidural steroid injections for symptomatic disc herniations. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(3):183–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, Jackson HB, Rogers DP, Vresilovic EJ. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of atraumatic cervical spondylotic radicular pain: a retrospective analysis with independent clinical review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(6):741–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cyteval C, Thomas E, Decoux E, Sarrabere M-P, Cottin A, Blotman F, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration performed under CT control in 30 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(3):441–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, DePalma MJ, Jackson HB. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(6):446–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, Jackson HB, Plastaras CT, Vresilovic EJ. Outcomes of therapeutic selective nerve root blocks for whiplash induced cervical radicular pain. Pain Physician. 2001;4(2):167–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kolstad F, Leivseth G, Nygaard OP. Transforaminal steroid injections in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A prospective outcome study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(10):1065–70 discussion 1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schaufele MK, Hatch L, Jones W. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar intervertebral disc herniations. Pain Physician. 2006;9(4):361–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee JW, Park KW, Chung S-K, Yeom JS, Kim K-J, Kim H-J, et al. Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38(11):1077–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bicket MC, Gupta A, Brown CH, Cohen SP. Epidural injections for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the “control” injections in randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(4):907–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    • Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Bodner G, Freund M, Maurer H, Kamelger FS, et al. Real-time sonographic imaging for periradicular injections in the lumbar spine: a sonographic anatomic study of a new technique. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(1):33–8. Cadaveric study assessing the feasibility of cervical facet intra-articular injections. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    • Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Bodner G, Freund MC, Gruber H, Maurer H, et al. Ultrasound-guided periradicular injections in the middle to lower cervical spine: an imaging study of a new approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30(4):391–6. Cadaveric study assessing the feasibility of cervical facet intra-articular injections. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    •• Narouze SN. Ultrasound-guided cervical periradicular injection: cautious optimism. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31(1):87; author reply 87–88. Reviews risks of US-guided injections. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gofeld M. Ultrasonography in pain medicine: a critical review. Pain Pract Off J World Inst Pain. 2008;8(4):226–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    • Narouze SN, Vydyanathan A, Kapural L, Sessler DI, Mekhail N. Ultrasound-guided cervical selective nerve root block: a fluoroscopy-controlled feasibility study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(4):343–8. Needle position accuracy in US-Guided cervical procedures for radiculopathy. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Huntoon MA. Anatomy of the cervical intervertebral foramina: vulnerable arteries and ischemic neurologic injuries after transforaminal epidural injections. Pain. 2005;117(1–2):104–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hoeft MA, Rathmell JP, Monsey RD, Fonda BJ. Cervical transforaminal injection and the radicular artery: variation in anatomical location within the cervical intervertebral foramina. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31(3):270–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lee HH, Park D, Oh Y, Ryu JS. Ultrasonography evaluation of vulnerable vessels around cervical nerve roots during selective cervical nerve root block. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(1):66–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Narouze SN. Ultrasound-guided cervical spine injections: ultrasound “prevents” whereas contrast fluoroscopy “detects” intravascular injections. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(2):127–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Finlayson RJ, Gupta G, Alhujairi M, Dugani S, Tran DQH. Cervical medial branch block: a novel technique using ultrasound guidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(2):219–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    •• Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(1):69–78. prospective study investigating US-guided injection. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Huston CW, Slipman CW. Diagnostic selective nerve root blocks: indications and usefulness. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002;13(3):545–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Furman MB, Lee TS, Mehta A, Simon JI, Cano WG. Contrast flow selectivity during transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2008;11(6):855–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhang X, Shi H, Zhou J, Xu Y, Pu S, Lv Y, et al. The effectiveness of ultrasound-guided cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective pilot study. J Pain Res. 2019;12:171–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McLean JP, Sigler JD, Plastaras CT, Garvan CW, Rittenberg JD. The rate of detection of intravascular injection in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections with and without digital subtraction angiography. PM R. 2009;1(7):636–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nahm FS, Lee CJ, Lee SH, Kim TH, Sim WS, Cho HS, et al. Risk of intravascular injection in transforaminal epidural injections. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(9):917–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O’Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine. 2003;28(1):21–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Green AW, Drummond S. Venous uptake despite negative aspiration during fluoroscopically guided interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2014;15(10):1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    El Abd OH, Amadera JED, Pimentel DC, Pimentel TSC. Intravascular flow detection during transforaminal epidural injections: a prospective assessment. Pain Physician. 2014;17(1):21–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kaplan MS, Cunniff J, Cooke J, Collins JG. Intravascular uptake during fluoroscopically guided cervical interlaminar steroid injection at C6-7: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):553–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Furman MB, O’Brien EM, Zgleszewski TM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injections. Spine. 2000;25(20):2628–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kang S, Yang SN, Kim SH, Byun CW, Yoon JS. Ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block: does volume affect the spreading pattern? Pain Med Malden Mass. 2016;17(11):1978–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yamauchi M, Suzuki D, Niiya T, Honma H, Tachibana N, Watanabe A, et al. Ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block: spread of solution and clinical effect. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2011;12(8):1190–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Park KD, Lee WY, Nam SH, Kim M, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study. J Ultrasound. 2018;5Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Park Y, Ahn JK, Sohn Y, Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, et al. Treatment effects of ultrasound guide selective nerve root block for lower cervical radicular pain: a retrospective study of 1-year follow-up. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013;37(5):658–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Conger A, Cushman DM, Speckman RA, Burnham T, Teramoto M, McCormick ZL. The effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of radicular pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. [cited 2019 Jul 18]; Available from: https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pm/pnz127/5513392
  70. 70.
    Lee S-H, Kim J-M, Chan V, Kim H-J, Kim H-I. Ultrasound-guided cervical periradicular steroid injection for cervical radicular pain: relevance of spread pattern and degree of penetration of contrast medium. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2013;14(1):5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rathmell JP, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of steroids. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(6):1595–600.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    • Narouze S, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in pain medicine: a review of anatomy, sonoanatomy, and procedures. Part II: axial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35(4):386–96. Review of US-guided interventional procedures in pain. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wakeling C, Bateman A, Hatrick A, Chatakondu S. Combined fluoroscopic and ultrasound guided cervical nerve root injections. Int Orthop. 2016;40(12):2547–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    J. Schneider B, Maybin S. Safety and risk mitigation for cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2017;5:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    •• Bogduk N, International Spine Intervention Society, editors. Practice guidelines for spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures, 1st edn. San Francisco: International Spine Intervention Society; 2004. 347 p. Spine Intervention Society guidelines. Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Visnjevac O, Kim P, Farid-Davari S, Johnson P, Nader ND. Digital subtraction angiography versus real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular penetration prior to epidural steroid injections: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Pain Physician. 2015;18(1):29–36.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Park SK, Choi YS. Advantages of digital subtraction angiography during nerve block. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2014;4(5):e19927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Park D, Seong MY, Kim HY, Ryu JS. Spinal cord injury during ultrasound-guided C7 cervical medial branch block. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(6):e111–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Maus T, Schueler BA, Leng S, Magnuson D, Magnuson DJ, Diehn FE. Radiation dose incurred in the exclusion of vascular filling in transforaminal epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopy, digital subtraction angiography, and CT/fluoroscopy. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2014;15(8):1328–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Pm 2015 at 2:45. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - Levels of Evidence (March 2009). CEBM; 2009 [cited 2019 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/2009/06/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/.
  81. 81.
    Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropr Med. 2006;5(3):101–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(1):9–18.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sackett DL. Applying overviews and meta-analyses at the bedside. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(1):61–6 discussion 67-70.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 1988;138(8):697–703.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hutchison BG. Critical appraisal of review articles. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 1993;39:1097–102.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kable AK, Pich J, Maslin-Prothero SE. A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: a 12 step guideline for authors. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(8):878–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Ehsanian
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • David J. Kennedy
    • 1
  • Byron Schneider
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  3. 3.Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of New Mexico School of MedicineAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations