Advertisement

The Effectiveness and Safety of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: a Comprehensive Literature Review

  • Quinn TateEmail author
  • Aaron Conger
  • Taylor Burnham
  • Daniel M. Cushman
  • Richard Kendall
  • Byron Schneider
  • Zachary L. McCormick
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (B Schneider, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Review the effectiveness and safety of current treatment protocols for fluoroscopically guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) used for recalcitrant knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA).

Recent Findings

Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies of fluoroscopically guided RFA of the genicular nerves demonstrate variability in responder rates from 59% at 3 months to as high as 74% at 6 month follow-up. Studies that investigated the prognostic value of genicular nerve blocks to select patients for RFA demonstrate no difference in outcomes with current treatment protocols. Other factors that may influence the success rate of this procedure include radiologic severity of osteoarthritis, longer duration of knee pain, smoking, and bilateral knee pain. Relative safety of this procedure has been shown with no adverse events reported in reviewed trials, but several case reports demonstrate there are risks associated with this procedure. Recent neuroanatomical studies show additional genicular nerves that could likely be safely targeted by RFA, yet are not included in current treatment protocols.

Summary

RFA provides an effective treatment option for patients with recalcitrant chronic knee pain secondary to OA with up to 74% of patients experiencing greater than 50% pain relief at 6 months. The procedure is relatively safe, but risks should be weighed against potential benefits. Further research is needed to determine need for prognostic blocks, determine prognostic radiologic factors, and determine changes in effectiveness with updated treatment protocols that target more genicular nerves.

Keywords

Genicular RFA Genicular neurotomy Osteoarthritis Genicular nerves Radiofrequency ablation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Zachary McCormick reports service on the board of directors of the Spine Intervention Society. Quinn Tate, Aaron Conger, Taylor Burnham, Daniel Cushman, Richard Kendall, and Byron Schneider declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, et al. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(9):1207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Damen J, van Rijn RM, Emans PJ, Hilberdink WKHA, Wesseling J, Oei EHG, et al. Prevalence and development of hip and knee osteoarthritis according to American College of Rheumatology criteria in the CHECK cohort. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Carr A, Randall T, et al. Population survey comparing older adults with hip versus knee pain in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(512):192–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blacketer C, Gill T, Taylor A, Hill C. Prevalence and health care usage of knee pain in South Australia (SA): a population based study. Intern Med J. 2019;49(9):1105–1110.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garstang SV, Stitik TP. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(11 Suppl):S2–11 quiz S12–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mannoni A, Briganti MP, Di Bari M, Ferrucci L, Costanzo S, Serni U, et al. Epidemiological profile of symptomatic osteoarthritis in older adults: a population based study in Dicomano, Italy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(6):576–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vincent HK, Heywood K, Connelly J, Hurley RW. Obesity and weight loss in the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis. PM R. 2012;4(5 Suppl):S59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lementowski PW, Zelicof SB. Obesity and osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008;37(3):148–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felson DT. Weight and osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1995;43:7–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deyle GD, Allison SC, Matekel RL, Ryder MG, Stang JM, Gohdes DD, et al. Physical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program. Phys Ther. 2005;85(12):1301–17.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzgerald GK, Fritz JM, Childs JD, Brennan GP, Talisa V, Gil AB, et al. Exercise, manual therapy, and use of booster sessions in physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a multi-center, factorial randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(8):1340–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(4):465–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Desai S, Solomon D, Abramson S. Recommendations for use of selective and nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an American College of Rheumatology white paper. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(8):1058–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bouvard B, Legrand E, Audran M, Chappard D. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a review. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2010;8(1):15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adami G, Saag KG. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: 2019 concise clinical review. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:1145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dai WL, Zhou AG, Zhang H, Zhang J. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(3):659–70.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dumenci L, Perera RA, Keefe FJ, Ang DC, Slover J, Jensen MP, et al. Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2019;27:878–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cosman ER. Electric and thermal field effects in tissue around radiofrequency electrodes. Pain Med. 2005;6(6):405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Organ LW. Electrophysiologic principles of radiofrequency lesion making. Appl Neurophysiol. 1976;39(2):69–76.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bogduk N, Dreyfuss P, Govind J. A narrative review of lumbar medial branch neurotomy for the treatment of back pain. Pain Med. 2009;10(6):1035–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen SP, Hurley RW, Buckenmaier CC, Kurihara C, Morlando B, Dragovich A. Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(2):279–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    •• Tran J, Peng PWH, Lam K, Baig E, Agur AMR, Gofeld M. Anatomical study of the innervation of anterior knee joint capsule: implication for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(4):407–14. This detailed anatomical study shows the complexity of genicular innervation and locations of nerves that are likely not being targeted with current protocols. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCormick ZL, Vorobeychik Y, Gill JS, Kao MJ, Duszynski B, Smuck M, et al. Guidelines for composing and assessing a paper on the treatment of pain: a practical application of evidence-based medicine principles to the mint randomized clinical trials. Pain Med. 2018;19(11):2127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bogduk N, Kennedy DJ, Vorobeychik Y, Engel A. Guidelines for composing and assessing a paper on treatment of pain. Pain Med. 2017;18(11):2096–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Altman DG. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ. 1998;317(7168):1309–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):857–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Newcombe RG. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. Absolute risk reduction is less likely to be misunderstood. BMJ. 1999;318(7200):1765–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22(158):209–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Olsen MF, Bjerre E, Hansen MD, Tendal B, Hilden J, Hróbjartsson A. Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;101:87–106.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hmamouchi I, Allali F, Tahiri L, Khazzani H, Mansouri LE, Ali Ou Alla S, et al. Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: a prospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Clement ND, MacDonald D, Simpson AH. The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(8):1933–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(4):283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee WC, Kwan YH, Chong HC, Yeo SJ. The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(11):3354–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ghahreman A, Ferch R, Bogduk N. The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(8):1149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, et al. Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2015;8(3):16–33.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sarı S, Aydın ON, Turan Y, Özlülerden P, Efe U, Kurt Öİ. Which one is more effective for the clinical treatment of chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis: radiofrequency neurotomy of the genicular nerves or intra-articular injection? Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(10):1772–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, et al. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011;152(3):481–7. This study is the only double blinded randomized controlled trial for genicular RFA. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    •• Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, Hunter C, Lindley D, Patel N, et al. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover clinical trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation with corticosteroid injection in the management of knee pain from osteoarthritis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(1):84–91. This study is the only multicenter randomized comparitive study. Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    McCormick ZL, Reddy R, Korn M, Dayanim D, Syed RH, Bhave M, et al. A prospective randomized trial of prognostic genicular nerve blocks to determine the predictive value for the outcome of cooled radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2018;19(8):1628–38.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    El-Hakeim EH, Elawamy A, Kamel EZ, Goma SH, Gamal RM, Ghandour AM, et al. Fluoroscopic guided radiofrequency of genicular nerves for pain alleviation in chronic knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2018;21(2):169–77.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jadon A, Jain P, Motaka M, Swarupa CP, Amir M. Comparative evaluation of monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(11):876–80.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(8):1886–93.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ball RD. The science of conventional and water-cooled monopolar lumbar radiofrequency rhizotomy: an electrical engineering point of view. Pain Physician. 2014;17(2):E175–211.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shen WS, Xu XQ, Zhai NN, Zhou ZS, Shao J, Yu YH. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in relieving refractory pain of knee osteoarthritis. Am J Ther. 2017;24(6):e693–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cosman ER, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med. 2014;15(12):2020–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ahmed A, Arora D. Ultrasound-guided neurolysis of six genicular nerves for intractable pain from knee osteoarthritis: a case series. Pain Pract. 2019;19(1):16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Santana Pineda MM, Vanlinthout LE, Moreno Martín A, van Zundert J, Rodriguez Huertas F, Novalbos Ruiz JP. Analgesic effect and functional improvement caused by radiofrequency treatment of genicular nerves in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee until 1 year following treatment. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):62–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ahmed A, Arora D. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of knee for relief of intractable pain from knee osteoarthritis: a case series. Br J Pain. 2018;12(3):145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    House LM, Korn MA, Garg A, Jung MJ, Kendall MC, Walega DR, McCormick ZL. Severity of knee osteoarthritis and pain relief after cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves. Pain Med 2019.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Conger A, McCormick ZL, Henrie AM. Pes Anserine tendon injury resulting from cooled radiofrequency ablation of the inferior medial genicular nerve. PM R 2019.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quinn Tate
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aaron Conger
    • 1
  • Taylor Burnham
    • 1
  • Daniel M. Cushman
    • 1
  • Richard Kendall
    • 1
  • Byron Schneider
    • 2
  • Zachary L. McCormick
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations