Review of Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention in Female Soccer Athletes

  • Zachary BailowitzEmail author
  • Jennifer Soo Hoo
Sports Medicine Rehabilitation (B Liem and BJ Krabak, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Sports Medicine Rehabilitation


Purpose of Review

This paper aims to review the recent literature regarding the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries in female soccer athletes.

Recent Findings

Female soccer players are at risk for many musculoskeletal injuries, mostly involving the lower extremities, due to anatomic, hormonal, and biomechanical factors. Various programs are available that target overall injury prevention, as well as specifically the prevention of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), ankle, and overuse injuries. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+ is the most well-studied program for overall injury prevention and has been shown to have modest but significant effects in injury incidence. Prevention of ACL injuries is also well studied, and multiple programs have been shown to significantly reduce incidence, especially in youth athletes. Fewer current studies are available regarding ankle and overuse injuries.


Musculoskeletal injury prevention programs are available for female soccer players and may be effective in decreasing the incidence of certain injuries. There are clear differences in injury patterns in females compared to males, and further research is needed to specifically look at injury prevention in this population.


Soccer Injury prevention Female athletes Anterior cruciate ligament Overuse injuries Ankle injuries 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Donaldson A, Callaghan A, Bizzini M, Jowett A, Keyzer P, Nicholson M. A concept mapping approach to identifying the barriers to implementing an evidence-based sports injury prevention programme. Inj Prev 2018 Jan 20;injuryprev-2017-042639.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larruskain J, Lekue JA, Diaz N, Odriozola A, Gil SM. A comparison of injuries in elite male and female football players: a five-season prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(1):237–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mufty S, Bollars P, Vanlommel L, Van Crombrugge K, Corten K, Bellemans J. Injuries in male versus female soccer players: epidemiology of a nationwide study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015;81(2):289–95.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, Samitier G, Romero D, Lázaro-Haro C, et al. Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(7):705–29.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arundale AJH, Silvers-Granelli HJ, Marmon A, Zarzycki R, Dix C, Snyder-Mackler L. Changes in biomechanical knee injury risk factors across two collegiate soccer seasons using the 11+ prevention program. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(12):2592–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roos KG, Wasserman EB, Dalton SL, Gray A, Djoko A, Dompier TP, et al. Epidemiology of 3825 injuries sustained in six seasons of National Collegiate Athletic Association men’s and women’s soccer (2009/2010-2014/2015). Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(13):1029–34.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giza E, Mithofer K, Farrell L, Zarins B, Gill T, Drawer S. Injuries in women’s professional soccer. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(4):212–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dick R, Putukian M, Agel J, Evans TA, Marshall SW. Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate women’s soccer injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988–1989 through 2002–2003. J Athl Train. 2007;42(2):278–85.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Gall F, Carling C, Reilly T. Injuries in young elite female soccer players: an 8-season prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):276–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoo JH, Lim BO, Ha M, Lee SW, Oh SJ, Lee YS, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of neuromuscular training on the prevention of the anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(6):824–30.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu WD, Panossian V, Hatch JD, Liu SH, Finerman GA. Combined effects of estrogen and progesterone on the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop. 2001;383(383):268–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Posthuma BW, Bass MJ, Bull SB, Nisker JA. Detecting changes in functional ability in women with premenstrual syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156(2):275–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balachandar V, Marciniak J-L, Wall O, Balachandar C. Effects of the menstrual cycle on lower-limb biomechanics, neuromuscular control, and anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7(1):136–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ostenberg A, Roos H. Injury risk factors in female European football. A prospective study of 123 players during one season. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10(5):279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faude O, Junge A, Kindermann W, Dvorak J. Risk factors for injuries in elite female soccer players. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(9):785–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilstad A, Andersen TE, Bahr R, Holme I, Steffen K. Risk factors for lower extremity injuries in elite female soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(4):940–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Söderman K, Alfredson H, Pietilä T, Werner S. Risk factors for leg injuries in female soccer players: a prospective investigation during one out-door season. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2001;9(5):313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    • O’Kane JW, Neradilek M, Polissar N, Sabado L, Tencer A, Schiff MA. Risk factors for lower extremity overuse injuries in female youth soccer players. Orthop J Sports Med [Internet]. 2017 Oct 23 [cited 2019 Jan 13];5(10). Available from: This case control study of 351 female youth soccer players found that overuse injuries were associated with lower knee separation distance, decreased lower extremity strength, and playing on more than 1 soccer team.
  19. 19.
    Sentsomedi KR, Puckree T. Epidemiology of injuries in female high school soccer players. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16(1):298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brenner JS, And the Council on sports Medicine and Fitness. Overuse injuries, overtraining, and burnout in child and adolescent athletes. PEDIATRICS 2007;119(6):1242–1245.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jaspers A, Kuyvenhoven JP, Staes F, Frencken WGP, Helsen WF, Brink MS. Examination of the external and internal load indicators’ association with overuse injuries in professional soccer players. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(6):579–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacobson I, Tegner Y. Injuries among Swedish female elite football players: a prospective population study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17(1):84–91.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stracciolini A, Casciano R, Friedman HL, Meehan WP, Micheli LJ. A closer look at overuse injuries in the pediatric athlete. Clin J Sport Med. 2015;25(1):30–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoang QB, Mortazavi M. Pediatric overuse injuries in sports. Adv Pediatr Infect Dis. 2012;59(1):359–83.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Del Coso J, Herrero H, Salinero JJ. Injuries in Spanish female soccer players. J Sport Health Sci. 2018;7(2):183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. North Am J Sports Phys Ther NAJSPT. 2010;5(2):47–54.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Garrison M, Westrick R, Johnson MR, Benenson J. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(1):21–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCall A, Carling C, Davison M, Nedelec M, Le Gall F, Berthoin S, et al. Injury risk factors, screening tests and preventative strategies: a systematic review of the evidence that underpins the perceptions and practices of 44 football (soccer) teams from various premier leagues. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(9):583–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moran RW, Schneiders AG, Mason J, Sullivan SJ. Do functional movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(23):1661–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Al Attar WSA, Soomro N, Pappas E, Sinclair PJ, Sanders RH. How effective are F-MARC injury prevention programs for soccer players? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(2):205–17. Systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 studies found that FIFA injury prevention programs, particularly the FIFA 11+, had a statistically significant reduction in overall injury risk among soccer players.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soligard T, Myklebust G, Steffen K, Holme I, Silvers H, Bizzini M, et al. Comprehensive warm-up programme to prevent injuries in young female footballers: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337(dec09 2:a2469–9.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    • Steffen K, Emery CA, Romiti M, Kang J, Bizzini M, Dvorak J, et al. High adherence to a neuromuscular injury prevention programme (FIFA 11+) improves functional balance and reduces injury risk in Canadian youth female football players: a cluster randomised trial. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(12):794–802. FIFA 11+ was introduced in 31 youth teams in Canadian female soccer league. Results indicated that high player adherence resulted in significant improvements in functional balance and reduced injury risk.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krist MR, van Beijsterveldt AMC, Backx FJG, de Wit GA. Preventive exercises reduced injury-related costs among adult male amateur soccer players: a cluster-randomised trial. J Physiother. 2013;59(1):15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Steffen K, Myklebust G, Olsen OE, Holme I, Bahr R. Preventing injuries in female youth football--a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(5):605–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bizzini M, Dvorak J. FIFA 11+: an effective programme to prevent football injuries in various player groups worldwide—a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(9):577–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sadigursky D, Braid JA, De Lira DNL, Machado BAB, Carneiro RJF, Colavolpe PO. The FIFA 11+ injury prevention program for soccer players: a systematic review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2017 Nov 28 [cited 2019 Jan 13];9. Available from: Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thorborg K, Krommes KK, Esteve E, Clausen MB, Bartels EM, Rathleff MS. Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+ programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(7):562–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barengo NC, Meneses-Echávez JF, Ramírez-Vélez R, Cohen DD, Tovar G, Bautista JEC. The impact of the FIFA 11+ training program on injury prevention in football players: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health Basel. 2014;11(11):11986–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Steffen K, Meeuwisse WH, Romiti M, Kang J, McKay C, Bizzini M, et al. Evaluation of how different implementation strategies of an injury prevention programme (FIFA 11+) impact team adherence and injury risk in Canadian female youth football players: a cluster-randomised trial. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(8):480–7.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    De Ste Croix M, Hughes J, Ayala F, Taylor L, Datson N. Efficacy of injury prevention training is greater for high-risk vs low-risk elite female youth soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(13):3271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ugalde V, Brockman C, Bailowitz Z, Pollard CD. Single leg squat test and its relationship to dynamic knee valgus and injury risk screening. PM R. 2015;7(3):229–35; quiz 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fältström A, Kvist J, Gauffin H, Hägglund M. Female soccer players with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a higher risk of new knee injuries and quit soccer to a higher degree than knee-healthy controls. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(1):31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pollard CD, Sigward SM, Ota S, Langford K, Powers CM. The influence of in-season injury prevention training on lower-extremity kinematics during landing in female soccer players. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(3):223–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Neuromuscular retraining intervention programs: do they reduce noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury rates in adolescent female athletes? Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2014;30(2):245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Michaelidis M, Koumantakis GA. Effects of knee injury primary prevention programs on anterior cruciate ligament injury rates in female athletes in different sports: a systematic review. Phys Ther Sport. 2014;15(3):200–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Silvers-Granelli HJ, Bizzini M, Arundale A, Mandelbaum BR, Snyder-Mackler L. Does the FIFA 11+ injury prevention program reduce the incidence of ACL injury in male soccer players? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(10):2447–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    • Walden M, Atroshi I, Magnusson H, Wagner P, Hagglund M. Prevention of acute knee injuries in adolescent female football players: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012;344(may03 1):e3042–e3042. 230 Swedish adolescent female soccer teams were followed over 1 season during which a 15-minute neuromuscular warm up program was implemented. The rate of ACL injuries was significantly reduced from this program. Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    van Beijsterveldt AM, van de Port IG, Krist MR, Schmikli SL, Stubbe JH, Frederiks JE, et al. Effectiveness of an injury prevention programme for adult male amateur soccer players: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(16):1114–8.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rodríguez C, Echegoyen S, Aoyama T. The effects of “prevent injury and enhance performance program” in a female soccer team. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018;58(5):659–63.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    • Åman M, Larsén K, Forssblad M, Näsmark A, Waldén M, Hägglund M. A Nationwide follow-up survey on the effectiveness of an implemented neuromuscular training program to reduce acute knee injuries in soccer players. Orthop J Sports Med [Internet]. 2018 Dec 21 [cited 2019 Jan 27];6(12). Available from: Follow up survey looking at the implementation of a neuromuscular training program in Swedish male and female soccer players. In female soccer players, the incidence of cruciate ligament injuries decreased from 4.9 to 3.9 per 1000 player-years.
  51. 51.
    Mandelbaum BR, Silvers HJ, Watanabe DS, Knarr JF, Thomas SD, Griffin LY, et al. Effectiveness of a neuromuscular and proprioceptive training program in preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(7):1003–10.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gilchrist J, Mandelbaum BR, Melancon H, Ryan GW, Silvers HJ, Griffin LY, et al. A randomized controlled trial to prevent noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female collegiate soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1476–83.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kiani A, Hellquist E, Ahlqvist K, Gedeborg R, Michaëlsson K, Byberg L. Prevention of soccer-related knee injuries in teenaged girls. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hewett TE, Lindenfeld TN, Riccobene JV, Noyes FR. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    • Petushek EJ, Sugimoto D, Stoolmiller M, Smith G, Myer GD. Evidence-based best-practice guidelines for preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in young female athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2018 12;036354651878246. Meta-analysis of 18 studies looking at ACL injury risk reduction in female athletes. Based on these data, ACL programs should target younger athletes and use trained implementers who incorporate lower body strength exercises (ie, Nordic hamstrings, lunges, and calf raises) and focus specifically on landing stabilization exercises. Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Myer GD, Stroube BW, DiCesare CA, Brent JL, Ford KR, Heidt RS, et al. Augmented feedback supports skill transfer and reduces high-risk injury landing mechanics: a double-blind, randomized controlled laboratory study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(3):669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zebis MK, Andersen LL, Brandt M, Myklebust G, Bencke J, Lauridsen HB, et al. Effects of evidence-based prevention training on neuromuscular and biomechanical risk factors for ACL injury in adolescent female athletes: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med Lond. 2016;50(9):552–7.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    McCann RS, Kosik KB, Terada M, Beard MQ, Buskirk GE, Gribble PA. Acute lateral ankle sprain prediction in collegiate women’s soccer players. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13(1):12–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Verhagen EALM, Bay K. Optimising ankle sprain prevention: a critical review and practical appraisal of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(15):1082–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Owoeye OBA, Palacios-Derflingher LM, Emery CA. Prevention of ankle sprain injuries in youth soccer and basketball: effectiveness of a neuromuscular training program and examining risk factors. Clin J Sport Med. 2018;28(4):325–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Emery CA, Meeuwisse WH. The effectiveness of a neuromuscular prevention strategy to reduce injuries in youth soccer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med Lond. 2010;44(8):555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schiftan GS, Ross LA, Hahne AJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training in preventing ankle sprains in sporting populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(3):238–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Janssen KW, van der Zwaard BC, Finch CF, van Mechelen W, Verhagen EALM. Interventions preventing ankle sprains; previous injury and high-risk sport participation as predictors of compliance. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(6):465–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    • Grimm NL, Jacobs JC, Kim J, Amendola A, Shea KG. Ankle injury prevention programs for soccer athletes are protective: a level-i meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg. 2016;98(17):1436–43. Meta-analysis of 10 studies looking at male and female soccer players found that ankle injury prevention programs reduce the risk of ankle injury in the intervention group ( p < 0.002). No sex differences were analyzed in this study. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    McGuine TA, Hetzel S, Wilson J, Brooks A. The effect of lace-up ankle braces on injury rates in high school football players. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(1):49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dizon JMR, Reyes JJB. A systematic review on the effectiveness of external ankle supports in the prevention of inversion ankle sprains among elite and recreational players. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(3):309–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kemler E, van de Port I, Schmikli S, Huisstede B, Hoes A, Backx F. Effects of soft bracing or taping on a lateral ankle sprain: a non-randomised controlled trial evaluating recurrence rates and residual symptoms at one year. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8(1):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Barelds I, van den Broek AG, Huisstede BMA. Ankle bracing is effective for primary and secondary prevention of acute ankle injuries in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Sports Med. 2018;48(12):2775–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Thijs K, Huisstede B, Goedhart E, Backx F. The preventive effect of a soccer-specific ankle brace on acute lateral ankle sprains in girls amateur soccer players: study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev 2017 Jul 27;injuryprev-2017-042465.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    LaPrade RF, Agel J, Baker J, Brenner JS, Cordasco FA, Côté J, et al. AOSSM early sport specialization consensus statement. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(4):232596711664424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    DiFiori JP, Benjamin HJ, Brenner JS, Gregory A, Jayanthi N, Landry GL, et al. Overuse injuries and burnout in youth sports: a position statement from the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine. Br J Sports Med Lond. 2014;48(4):287–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jayanthi N, Pinkham C, Dugas L, Patrick B, LaBella C. Sports specialization in young athletes: evidence-based recommendations. Sports Health Multidiscip Approach. 2013;5(3):251–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    McGuine TA, Post EG, Hetzel SJ, Brooks MA, Trigsted S, Bell DR. A prospective study on the effect of sport specialization on lower extremity injury rates in high school athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(12):2706–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hall R, Foss KB, Hewett TE, Myer GD. Sport specialization’s association with an increased risk of developing anterior knee pain in adolescent female athletes. J Sport Rehabil. 2015;24(1):31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Brenner JS. COUNCIL ON SPORTS MEDICINE AND FITNESS. Sports specialization and intensive training in young athletes. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20162148–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative MedicineNewYork Presbyterian-ColumbiaNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations