Diaphragm Pacers in Pediatric Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: a Review and Implications for Inpatient Rehabilitation
- 90 Downloads
Purpose of review
Pediatric spinal cord injury (SCI) at C3 level and above results in tetraplegia and profound respiratory insufficiency requiring long-term positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and is associated with significant complications and morbidity. Diaphragm pacing (DP), a form of functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the diaphragm, provides natural negative pressure breathing which can replace or decrease PPV need. There are numerous reported benefits of DP including improved speech, reduced caregiver burden, and decrease in secretions. The purposes of this paper are to review the limited literature on the safety and effectiveness of DP in pediatric SCI and describe collaboration between two unaffiliated, geographically separated institutions to facilitate implantation of DP for children with ventilator-assisted tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation. We further describe the process for ventilator weaning/diaphragm conditioning during inpatient rehabilitation.
Two multicenter studies in adult patients with SCI demonstrate safety of the laparoscopic implantation procedure and effectiveness of the DPS system. The first pediatric patient was implanted in 2009, and since then, a total of 22 children with SCI had the system implanted. Among them, six children have now benefited from medically supervised multidisciplinary ventilator weaning/diaphragm conditioning supported by intensive activity-based restorative therapies (ABRT).
For the pediatric patients reviewed, implantation of DP was a safe and effective alternative to long-term PPV. Using DP in lieu of PPV provided freedom from ventilator tubing and fear of disconnection, simplifying and facilitating ABRT. We have found that the benefits of DP far surpass the significant effort needed to facilitate implantation during inpatient rehabilitation.
KeywordsTetraplegia Diaphragm pacing Ventilator weaning Pediatric Respiratory insufficiency Rehabilitation
Pam Kramer, nurse care manager for her contribution to this paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Case Western Reserve University, Dr. Raymond Onders, and University Hospitals Case Medical Center have intellectual property rights involved with the diaphragm pacing system and equity in Synapse Biomedical that manufactures the device. Janet M. Dean and Mary Jo Elmo reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 1.National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2017 Annual Statistical Report – Complete Public Version.Google Scholar
- 14.Onders RP, Elmo M, Khansarinia S, Bowman B, Yee J, Road J, et al. Complete worldwide operative experience in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing: results and differences in spinal cord injured patients and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1433–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0223-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Posluszny JA Jr, Onders R, Kerwin AJ, Weinstein MS, Stein DM, Knight J, et al. Multicenter review of diaphragm pacing in spinal cord injury: successful not only in weaning from ventilators but also in bridging to independent respiration. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(2):303–9; discussion 309-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Off-Label Use of Medical Devices in Children. Pediatrics. 2017;139(1). pii: e20163439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3439. Section On Cardiology And Cardiac Surgery; Section On Orthopaedics.
- 19.Jubran A, Grant B, Duffner L, Collins E, Lanuza D, Hoffman L, et al. Effect of pressure support vs unassisted breathing through a tracheostomy collar on weaning duration in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. A randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;309(7):671–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Massery M. Multisystem clinical implications of impaired breathing mechanics and postural control. In: Frownfelter D, Dean E, editors. Cardiovascular and pulmonary physical therapy: evidence to practice. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Mosby; 2012. p. 633–53.Google Scholar