Advertisement

Reconstructive Ladder for Transoral Resections of Oropharyngeal Cancers

  • Michael J. EliasonEmail author
  • Robert LindauIII
HEAD & NECK: Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer (W Lydiatt, Section Editor)
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on HEAD & NECK: Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer
  2. Topical Collection on HEAD & NECK: Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) now offers extended reach and capability to the head and neck oncologic surgeon, but in doing so, provides a reconstructive dilemma. The objective of this manuscript is to discuss the most recent advances and options available after resection with TORS.

Recent Findings

The latest research provides a common framework for surgeons to classify the type of oropharyngeal defect. A variety of reconstructive options described include secondary intent, modifications to existing local and regional flaps, and advances utilizing robotic assistance in free flap reconstruction.

Summary

There exists a multitude of reconstructive options with appropriate considerations for a stepwise approach based on patient-specific factors, surgeon capability, and the extent of the oropharyngeal defect. Just as robotic resection extends the capability in extirpation, it is now being used to refine free flap inset in the appropriate case.

Keywords

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) Oropharyngeal reconstruction Head and neck cancer Free flap reconstruction Reconstructive ladder Regional flap reconstruction 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    •• de Almeida JR, Park RC, Villanueva NL, et al. Reconstructive algorithm and classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects. Head Neck. 2014;36(7):934–41 Provides common classification for surgeons when discussing oropharyngeal defects after TORS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen MA, Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, et al. Transoral robotic surgery and human papillomavirus status: oncologic results. Head Neck. 2011;33:673–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hatten KM, Brody RM, Weinstein GS, et al. Defining the role of free flaps for transoral robotic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;80(1):45–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisen MD, Weinstein GS, Chalian A, Machtay M, Kent K, Coia LR, et al. Morbidity after midline mandibulotomy and radiation therapy. Am J Otolaryngol. 2000;21:312–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eskander A, Goldstein D, et al. Volume-outcome associations in head and neck cancer treatment: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2014;36:1820–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. NEJM. 2002;346:1128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:777–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283:1159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klug C, Berzaczy D, Voracek M, Enislidis G, Rath T, Millesi W, et al. Experience with microvascular free flaps in preoperatively irradiated tissue of the oral cavity and oropharynx in 303 patients. Oral Oncol. 2005;41:738–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh B, Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E, Shaha AR, Pfister DG, Shah JP. Factors associated with complication in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(2):403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas WW, Brant J, Chen J, Coblens O, Fischer JP, Newman JG, et al. Clinical factors associated with reoperation and prolonged length of stay in free tissue transfer to oncologic head and neck defects. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Mar 1;20(2):154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Almeida JR, Byrd JK, Wu R, Stucken CL, Duvvuri U, Goldstein DP, et al. A systematic review of transoral robotic surgery and radiotherapy for early oropharynx cancer: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2014 Sep;124(9):2096–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Longfield EA, Holsinger FC, Selber JC. Reconstruction after robotic head and neck surgery: when and why. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012 Sep;28(7):445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Montemari G, Rocco A, Galla S, Damiani V, Bellocchi G. Hypopharynx reconstruction with pectoralis major myofascial flap: our experience in 45 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:93–7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Chen WL, Zhang DM, Huang ZQ, et al. Comparison of outcomes with extensive segmental pectoralis major myocutaneous flap via the anterior axillary line and the conventional technique in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2018;40(2):349–54 Modification of a conventional regional flap for reconstruction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    • Barton BM, Riley CA, Pou JD, Hasney CP, Moore BA. The submental ssland flap is a viable reconstructive option for a variety of head and neck ablative defects. Ochsner J. 2018;18(1):53–8 Recent series of use of this regional flap following TORS.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anand AG, Tran EJ, Hasney CP, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES. Oropharyngeal reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap: a new flap alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:438–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandu K, Monnier P, Pasche P. Supraclavicular flap in head and neck reconstruction: experience in 50 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:1261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alves HR, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, et al. A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:1350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Meccariello G, Montevecchi F, Deganello A. The temporalis muscle flap for reconstruction of soft palate and lateral oropharyngeal wall after transoral robotic surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(1):162–4 Regional flap option for palatal defects.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bonawitz SC, Duvvuri U. Robotic-assisted FAMM flap for soft palate reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(4):870–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ibrahim B, Rahal A, Bissada E, Christopoulos A, Moubayed SP, Guertin L, et al. Decreasing revision surgery in FAMM flap reconstruction of the oral cavity: traditional versus modified harvesting technique. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:1802–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Welkoborsky HJ, Deichmüller C, Bauer L, Hinni ML. Reconstruction of large pharyngeal defects with microvascular free flaps and myocutaneous pedicled flaps. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21(4):318–27.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Genden EM, Park R, Smith C, Kotz T. The role of reconstruction for transoral robotic pharyngectomy and concomitant neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137:151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Almeida JR, Genden EM. Robotic assisted reconstruction of the oropharynx. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(4):237–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghanem TA. Transoral robotic-assisted microvascular reconstruction of the oropharynx. Laryngoscope. 2011 Mar;121(3):580–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garfein ES, Greaney PJ Jr, Easterlin B, Schiff B, Smith RV. Transoral robotic reconstructive surgery reconstruction of a tongue base defect with a radial forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2352–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    •• Sims JR, Moore EJ. Primary surgical management with radial forearm free flap reconstruction in T4 oropharyngeal cancer: complications and functional outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(2):116–21 Outcomes and complications data utilizing radial forearm free flaps.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Biron VL, O'Connell DA, Barber B, et al. Transoral robotic surgery with radial forearm free flap reconstruction: case control analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;46(1):20 Recent comparison of traditional lip-splitting versus TORS approach and their reconstruction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Selber JC. Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1978–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    • JYW C, RCL C, VLY C, et al. Transoral robotic total laryngopharyngectomy and free jejunal flap reconstruction for hypopharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017;72:194–6 Highlights use of TORS for inset of jejunal free flap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyNaval Medical Center PortsmouthPortsmouthUSA
  2. 2.Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Estabrook Cancer CenterNebraska Methodist HospitalOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations