Reconstructive Ladder for Transoral Resections of Oropharyngeal Cancers
- 8 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) now offers extended reach and capability to the head and neck oncologic surgeon, but in doing so, provides a reconstructive dilemma. The objective of this manuscript is to discuss the most recent advances and options available after resection with TORS.
The latest research provides a common framework for surgeons to classify the type of oropharyngeal defect. A variety of reconstructive options described include secondary intent, modifications to existing local and regional flaps, and advances utilizing robotic assistance in free flap reconstruction.
There exists a multitude of reconstructive options with appropriate considerations for a stepwise approach based on patient-specific factors, surgeon capability, and the extent of the oropharyngeal defect. Just as robotic resection extends the capability in extirpation, it is now being used to refine free flap inset in the appropriate case.
KeywordsTransoral robotic surgery (TORS) Oropharyngeal reconstruction Head and neck cancer Free flap reconstruction Reconstructive ladder Regional flap reconstruction
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.Hatten KM, Brody RM, Weinstein GS, et al. Defining the role of free flaps for transoral robotic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;80(1):45–9.Google Scholar
- 15.Montemari G, Rocco A, Galla S, Damiani V, Bellocchi G. Hypopharynx reconstruction with pectoralis major myofascial flap: our experience in 45 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:93–7.Google Scholar
- 16.• Chen WL, Zhang DM, Huang ZQ, et al. Comparison of outcomes with extensive segmental pectoralis major myocutaneous flap via the anterior axillary line and the conventional technique in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2018;40(2):349–54 Modification of a conventional regional flap for reconstruction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.• Barton BM, Riley CA, Pou JD, Hasney CP, Moore BA. The submental ssland flap is a viable reconstructive option for a variety of head and neck ablative defects. Ochsner J. 2018;18(1):53–8 Recent series of use of this regional flap following TORS.Google Scholar
- 24.Welkoborsky HJ, Deichmüller C, Bauer L, Hinni ML. Reconstruction of large pharyngeal defects with microvascular free flaps and myocutaneous pedicled flaps. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21(4):318–27.Google Scholar