Optimizing Value in Otolaryngology Through Patient Safety and Quality Improvements
Purpose of Review
The goals of this paper are to explore the relationship between patient safety/quality improvement (PS/QI) activities and value generation in the field of otolaryngology and to suggest future opportunities for improvement or research. Value is defined as the ratio between health outcomes or improvements achieved and resources and dollars spent. It can therefore be increased by improving outcomes, reducing costs, or both. We present information suggesting that PS/QI activities may impact both the numerator and denominator in the value ratio, with the potential for powerful effects on value in health care.
We describe clinical and administrative strategies demonstrated to increase value across multiple subspecialties in otolaryngology.
PS/QI can improve both components of value in health care. Relatively simple interventions may have significant impact and serve as good starting points. Larger-scale changes may have even broader impact but may require more infrastructure investment.
KeywordsPatient safety/quality improvement Cost Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery Electronic health record Tracheostomy Morbidity and mortality Clinical practice guideline Performance measures Registry NSQIP Cost-effectiveness Comparative effectiveness
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.• Gawande A. The cost conundrum. The New Yorker. 2009;1:36–44. This article provides insight into the relationship between cost, quality, and value in health care and is worth a read as it launched a profession-spanning conversation about these issues.Google Scholar
- 2.Gettelfinger JD, Barrett Paulk P, Schmalbach CE. Patient safety and quality improvement in otolaryngology education: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017 06/01; 2018/01;156(6):991–998.Google Scholar
- 7.Eskander A, Kang SY, Tweel B, Sitapara J, Old M, Ozer E, et al. Quality indicators: measurement and predictors in head and neck cancer free flap patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017:0194599817742373.Google Scholar
- 9.Wilkinson K, Martin I, Freeth H, Kelly K, Mason M. NCEPOD: on the right trach. URL http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2014tc.htm [accessed on 10 January 2016] 2014.
- 13.Health IT. EHR incentives and certifications: meaningful use definition & objectives. 2015; Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/meaningful-use-definition-objectives. Accessed January 9, 2018.
- 16.Accelerating chart review using automated methods on electronic health record data for postoperative complications. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings: American Medical Informatics Association; 2016.Google Scholar
- 17.Harbaugh CM, Lee JS, Hu HM, McCabe SE, Voepel-Lewis T, Englesbe MJ, et al. Persistent opioid use among pediatric patients after surgery. Pediatrics 2018 Jan;141(1): https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-2439. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
- 19.• Yin HS, Parker RM, Sanders LM, Mendelsohn A, Dreyer BP, Bailey SC, et al. Pictograms, units and dosing tools, and parent medication errors: a randomized study. Pediatrics 2017; 140(1). pii: e20163237. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3237. A well-designed randomized trial of dosing methods, demonstrating clear differences in dosing errors between different strategies.
- 20.American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. Choosing Wisely. Available at: http://www.entnet.org/ChoosingWisely.
- 21.Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN, Robertson P. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 2013;148(1_suppl):S1-S55.Google Scholar
- 22.Institute for Healthcare Improvement website. http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/TripleAim/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed Feb 18, 2018.
- 23.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/index.html. Accessed Feb 18, 2018.
- 27.Gross R, Tabenkin H, Porath A, Heymann A, Greenstein M, Porter B, Matzliach R. The relationship between primary care physicians’ adherence to guidelines for the treatment of diabetes and patient satisfaction: findings from a pilot study. Fam Pract 2003;20(5):563–9.
- 28.•• Hurtado M, Swift E, Corrigan J. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the National Quality Report on Health Care Delivery 2001. Baugh RF, Basura GJ, Ishii LE, Schwartz SR, Drumheller CM, Burkholder R, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Bell’s palsy. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2013;149(3_suppl):S1-S27. An iconic document references in almost every discussion of quality and safety in health care. Google Scholar