Advertisement

Optimizing Value in Otolaryngology Through Patient Safety and Quality Improvements

  • Karthik Balakrishnan
  • Jean Brereton
  • Samantha T. Cohen
  • Mimi S. Kokoska
  • Michael J. Brenner
SPECIAL TOPICS: Value Based Care in Otolaryngology (L Ishii and T Tollefson, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on SPECIAL TOPICS: Value Based Care in Otolaryngology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The goals of this paper are to explore the relationship between patient safety/quality improvement (PS/QI) activities and value generation in the field of otolaryngology and to suggest future opportunities for improvement or research. Value is defined as the ratio between health outcomes or improvements achieved and resources and dollars spent. It can therefore be increased by improving outcomes, reducing costs, or both. We present information suggesting that PS/QI activities may impact both the numerator and denominator in the value ratio, with the potential for powerful effects on value in health care.

Recent Findings

We describe clinical and administrative strategies demonstrated to increase value across multiple subspecialties in otolaryngology.

Summary

PS/QI can improve both components of value in health care. Relatively simple interventions may have significant impact and serve as good starting points. Larger-scale changes may have even broader impact but may require more infrastructure investment.

Keywords

Patient safety/quality improvement Cost Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery Electronic health record Tracheostomy Morbidity and mortality Clinical practice guideline Performance measures Registry NSQIP Cost-effectiveness Comparative effectiveness 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • Gawande A. The cost conundrum. The New Yorker. 2009;1:36–44. This article provides insight into the relationship between cost, quality, and value in health care and is worth a read as it launched a profession-spanning conversation about these issues.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gettelfinger JD, Barrett Paulk P, Schmalbach CE. Patient safety and quality improvement in otolaryngology education: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017 06/01; 2018/01;156(6):991–998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477–81. A seminal article defining the fundamental components of value. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burwell SM. Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(10):897–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balakrishnan K, Goico B, Arjmand EM. Applying cost accounting to operating room staffing in otolaryngology: time-driven activity-based costing and outpatient adenotonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(4):684–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garcia JA, Mistry B, Hardy S, Fracchia MS, Hersh C, Wentland C, et al. Time-driven activity-based costing to estimate cost of care at multidisciplinary aerodigestive centers. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2152–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eskander A, Kang SY, Tweel B, Sitapara J, Old M, Ozer E, et al. Quality indicators: measurement and predictors in head and neck cancer free flap patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017:0194599817742373.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das P, Zhu H, Shah RK, Roberson DW, Berry J, Skinner ML. Tracheotomy-related catastrophic events: results of a national survey. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(1):30–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilkinson K, Martin I, Freeth H, Kelly K, Mason M. NCEPOD: on the right trach. URL http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2014tc.htm [accessed on 10 January 2016] 2014.
  10. 10.
    Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cetto R, Arora A, Hettige R, Nel M, Benjamin L, Gomez C, et al. Improving tracheostomy care: a prospective study of the multidisciplinary approach. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36(5):482–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown D, Cameron T, Donoghue F, McKinstry A, Sweeney J, Burt S, et al. Outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury before and after introduction of an interdisciplinary tracheostomy team. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 2009;11(1):14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Health IT. EHR incentives and certifications: meaningful use definition & objectives. 2015; Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/meaningful-use-definition-objectives. Accessed January 9, 2018.
  14. 14.
    Phillips DR, Ellsperman SE, Matt BH, Zarzaur BL. Comparison of automated posttonsillectomy bleed capture with self-report. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2017;143(8):764–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murff HJ, FitzHenry F, Matheny ME, Gentry N, Kotter KL, Crimin K, et al. Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing. JAMA. 2011;306(8):848–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Accelerating chart review using automated methods on electronic health record data for postoperative complications. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings: American Medical Informatics Association; 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harbaugh CM, Lee JS, Hu HM, McCabe SE, Voepel-Lewis T, Englesbe MJ, et al. Persistent opioid use among pediatric patients after surgery. Pediatrics 2018 Jan;141(1): https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-2439. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
  18. 18.
    Malte CA, Berger D, Saxon AJ, Hagedorn HJ, Achtmeyer CE, Mariano AJ, et al. Electronic medical record alert associated with reduced opioid and benzodiazepine coprescribing in high-risk veteran patients. Med Care. 2018;56(2):171–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Yin HS, Parker RM, Sanders LM, Mendelsohn A, Dreyer BP, Bailey SC, et al. Pictograms, units and dosing tools, and parent medication errors: a randomized study. Pediatrics 2017; 140(1). pii: e20163237.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3237. A well-designed randomized trial of dosing methods, demonstrating clear differences in dosing errors between different strategies.
  20. 20.
    American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. Choosing Wisely. Available at: http://www.entnet.org/ChoosingWisely.
  21. 21.
    Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN, Robertson P. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 2013;148(1_suppl):S1-S55.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Institute for Healthcare Improvement website. http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/TripleAim/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed Feb 18, 2018.
  23. 23.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/index.html. Accessed Feb 18, 2018.
  24. 24.
    Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beach MC, Keruly J, Moore RD. Is the quality of the patient-provider relationship associated with better adherence and health outcomes for patients with HIV? J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(6):661–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102(4):520–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gross R, Tabenkin H, Porath A, Heymann A, Greenstein M, Porter B, Matzliach R. The relationship between primary care physicians’ adherence to guidelines for the treatment of diabetes and patient satisfaction: findings from a pilot study. Fam Pract 2003;20(5):563–9.
  28. 28.
    •• Hurtado M, Swift E, Corrigan J. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the National Quality Report on Health Care Delivery 2001. Baugh RF, Basura GJ, Ishii LE, Schwartz SR, Drumheller CM, Burkholder R, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Bell’s palsy. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2013;149(3_suppl):S1-S27. An iconic document references in almost every discussion of quality and safety in health care. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karthik Balakrishnan
    • 1
  • Jean Brereton
    • 2
  • Samantha T. Cohen
    • 3
  • Mimi S. Kokoska
    • 4
  • Michael J. Brenner
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Mayo Clinic Children’s CenterMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryAlexandriaUSA
  3. 3.Ross School of BusinessUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Health Care Quality and AffordabilityBlue Shield of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Michigan School of MedicineAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations