Advertisement

Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum

  • Zachary Berman
  • Masoud Shiehmorteza
  • Michael E. HahnEmail author
Ultrasound (M Hahn and M Shiehmorteza, Section Editors)
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Ultrasound

Abstract

Purpose of Review

As the number of cesarean deliveries continues to increase, the incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has also increased. This is likely due to the abnormal placenta/uterus interface caused by macro- or microscopic scar tissue from prior instrumentation or previous infection. Due to increasing incidence, it is important to be aware of the imaging findings of PAS, as well as the strengths and limitations of different imaging modalities.

Recent Findings

This review focuses on the ultrasound evaluation of PAS, evaluating the accuracy of various sonographic findings and comparing these results to other imaging modalities, particularly MRI. We explore the updated current guidelines for the imaging work up of PAS as suggested by relevant societies. Additionally, we present a brief discussion of recently introduced structured reporting templates for ultrasound reporting and statistical models to predict diagnostic accuracy for PAS.

Summary

Many updates have recently been published evaluating ultrasound and MRI as screening and diagnostic tools for diagnosing PAS. This review describes and highlights many of the new developments and promising future advances.

Keywords

Placenta accreta spectrum First trimester identification Scar pregnancy Ultrasound MRI 

Notes

References

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    •• Society of Gynecologic O, American College of O, Gynecologists, the Society for Maternal-Fetal M, Cahill AG, Beigi R, et al. Placenta accreta spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(6):B2–B16. This reflects a new multi-society recommended nomenclature to include most recent literature advances in understanding the pathogenesis and outcomes of the placenta accreta spectrum.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irving CHA. A study of placenta accreta. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1937;38(6):1088–200.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR. Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):1905–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG. 2014;121(1):62–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA, Gabriel GE, Nassar AH. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1045–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall T, Wax JR, Lucas FL, Cartin A, Jones M, Pinette MG. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of placenta accreta–impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;42(8):449–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):75–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silver RM. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):654–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1458–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017;287:1–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):14–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66(1):89–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fox H, Sen DK. Placenta extrachorialis. A clinico-pathological study. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79(1):32–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33(4):244–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ersoy AO, Oztas E, Ozler S, Ersoy E, Erkenekli K, Uygur D, et al. Can venous ProBNP levels predict placenta accreta? J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(24):4020–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lyell DJ, Faucett AM, Baer RJ, Blumenfeld YJ, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY, et al. Maternal serum markers, characteristics and morbidly adherent placenta in women with previa. J Perinatol. 2015;35(8):570–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Comstock CH. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(1):89–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Finberg HJ, Williams JW. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11(7):333–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pagani G, Cali G, Acharya G, Trisch IT, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Familiari A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(1):25–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fadl S, Moshiri M, Fligner CL, Katz DS, Dighe M. Placental imaging: normal appearance with review of pathologic findings. Radiographics. 2017;37(3):979–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(5):509–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Windrim R, Kingdom J, Jang HJ, Burns PN. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the prenatal evaluation of suspected invasive placenta percreta. J Obstet Gynaecol Can: JOGC. 2016;38(10):975–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Kennedy AM, Richards DS, Winter TC 3rd, Woodward PJ, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound for the prediction of placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(2):177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kilcoyne A, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Roberts DJ, Sisodia RC, Gervais DA, Lee SI. MRI of placenta accreta, placenta increta, and placenta percreta: pearls and pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(1):214–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, Woodward P, Hubinont C, Collins S, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):274–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Einerson BD, Rodriguez CE, Kennedy AM, Woodward PJ, Donnelly MA, Silver RM. Magnetic resonance imaging is often misleading when used as an adjunct to ultrasound in the management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(6):618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Panaiotova J, Tokunaka M, Krajewska K, Zosmer N, Nicolaides KH. Screening for morbidly adherent placenta in early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cali G, Forlani F, Foti F, Minneci G, Manzoli L, Flacco ME, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound in detecting abnormally invasive placenta in high-risk women with placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(2):258–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen YJ, Wang PH, Liu WM, Lai CR, Shu LP, Hung JH. Placenta accreta diagnosed at 9 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(6):620–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Comstock CH, Lee W, Vettraino IM, Bronsteen RA. The early sonographic appearance of placenta accreta. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(1):19–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    •• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Maymon R, Arslan AA, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):383–95. This paper explores concepts linking the histology of placenta accreta and cesarean section scar pregnancies, demonstrating a similar histologic appearance.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, Ramos J, Berg R, Kovacs S. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(4):601–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moschos E, Wells CE, Twickler DM. Biometric sonographic findings of abnormally adherent trophoblastic implantations on cesarean delivery scars. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(3):475–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, El Refaey H, Kaelin Agten A, Arslan AA. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rac MW, Moschos E, Wells CE, McIntire DD, Dashe JS, Twickler DM. Sonographic findings of morbidly adherent placenta in the first trimester. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(2):263–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    •• Alfirevic Z, Tang AW, Collins SL, Robson SC, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Ad hoc International AIPEG. Pro forma for ultrasound reporting in suspected abnormally invasive placenta (AIP): an international consensus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):276–8. These papers describe the benefits of standardized reporting for cases of suspected placenta accreta spectrum and demonstrate the utility of improved diagnostic abilities through standardized approaches. Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    •• Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, Calda P, Langhoff-Roos J, Morel O, et al. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):271–5. These papers describe the benefits of standardized reporting for cases of suspected placenta accreta spectrum and demonstrate the utility of improved diagnostic abilities through standardized approaches. Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rac MW, Dashe JS, Wells CE, Moschos E, McIntire DD, Twickler DM. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the placenta accreta index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zachary Berman
    • 1
  • Masoud Shiehmorteza
    • 1
  • Michael E. Hahn
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations