Advertisement

Molecular Imaging of Renal Malignancy: A Review

  • C. Elias GraybielEmail author
  • Robert R. Flavell
  • Zhen J. Wang
  • Spencer C. Behr
Nuclear Medicine & PET/CT Imaging (R Flavell, Section Editor)
  • 26 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Nuclear Medicine & PET/CT Imaging

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy that is often detected incidentally in patients undergoing cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen for workup of pain or other symptoms. Due to overlap in imaging findings of RCC and benign tumors, biopsy may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Biopsies are occasionally non-diagnostic, however, and in small lesions or patients with comorbidities may not be technically feasible. Molecular imaging techniques can characterize tumors as being more likely malignant or benign and obviate the need for invasive testing, as well as providing accurate whole-body staging in patients with known RCC.

Recent Findings

PET/CT with 18F-FDG and other radionuclides can identify primary renal masses with higher malignant potential and also allows for sensitive detection of metastatic RCC. SPECT/CT imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi can provide useful information to support the diagnosis of benign oncocytic neoplasms over more aggressive RCC subtypes. Investigational molecular imaging techniques such as immunoPET and hyperpolarized 13C MRI have also shown promise in renal mass characterization.

Summary

This review article aims to outline the various molecular imaging modalities available in the evaluation of primary renal tumors and in whole-body staging of metastatic RCC.

Keywords

RCC Renal cell carcinoma FDG PET PET/CT Molecular imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Steven Rowe for contributing the cases as shown in Fig. 4.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of interest

Spencer C. Behr reports grants from Cancer Targeted Technology and GE Healthcare and is a consultant for QED Therapeutics. Robert R. Flavell is a section editor for Current Radiology Reports. C. Elias Graybiel and Zhen J. Wang each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Okoro C, Diaz AW, Linehan WM, Choyke PL, Metwalli AR. Molecular imaging of renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review. J Mol Genet Med. 2014;8(2):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.4172/1747-0862.1000117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robinson CM, Lefebvre F, Poon BP, Bousard A, Fan X, Lathrop M, et al. Consequences of VHL loss on global DNA methylome. Sci Rep. 2018;8(3313):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21524-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    • Shinagare AB, Krajewski KM, Braschi-Amirfarzan M, Ramaiya NH. Advanced renal cell carcinoma: role of the radiologist in the era of precision medicine. Radiology. 2017;284(2):333–51.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017160343. Provides an overview of the pathophysiology of the various RCC subtypes, imaging features, and current therapies employed for treating advanced RCC.
  4. 4.
    Lawrentschuk N, Davis ID, Bolton DM, Scott AM. Functional imaging of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:258–66.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Divgi CR, Pandit-Taskar N, Jungbluth AA, Reuter VE, Gonen M, Ruan S, et al. Preoperative characterisation of clear-cell renal carcinoma using iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 (124I-cG250) and PET in patients with renal masses: a phase I trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(4):304–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70044-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Divgi CR, Uzzo RG, Gatsonis C, Bartz R, Treutner S, Yu JQ, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the REDECT trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(2):187–94.  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.41.2445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Win AZ, Aparici CM. Clinical effectiveness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in management of renal cell carcinoma: a single institution experience. World J Nucl Med. 2015;14(1):36–40.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.150535.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tirumani SH, Souza D, Krajewski KM, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Shinagare AB. Impact of histologic subtype and sarcomatoid transformation on metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: a single institute experience in 149 patients. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41(2):295–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0569-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wobker SE, Williamson SR. Modern pathologic diagnosis of renal oncocytoma. J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2017;4(4):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.2017.96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    • Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, Bass EB, Cadeddu JA, Chang A, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2017;198(3):520–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100. Provides an update on the American Urological Association guidelines for management of renal masses and localized RCC.
  11. 11.
    Wang H, Cheng L, Zhang X, Wang D, Guo A, Gao Y, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for subtype differentiation at 3.0T. Radiology. 2010;257(1):135–43.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10092396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun MRM, Ngo L, Genega EM, Atkins MB, Finn ME, Rofsky NM, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes; correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology. 2009;250(3):793–802.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2503080995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yin Y, Campbell SP, Markowski MC, Pierorazio PM, Pomper MG, Allaf ME, et al. Inconsistent detection of sites of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma with PSMA-targeted [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1271-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    • Liu Y. The place of FDG PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma: value and limitations. Front Oncol. 2016;6(201):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00201. Provides a review of the utility of FDG PET in evaluating primary RCC, in addition to RCC staging and restaging.
  15. 15.
    Takahashi M, Kume H, Koyama K, Nakagawa T, Fujimura T, Morikawa T, et al. Preoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma by using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(12):936–40.  https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000000875.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang H, Ding H, Chen J, Chao C, Lu Y, Lin W, et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12(3):464–74.  https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang DE, White RL Jr, Zuger JH, Sasser HC, Teigland CM. Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004;171(5):1806–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000120241.50061.e4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aide N, Cappele O, Bottet P, Bensadoun H, Regeasse A, Comoz F, et al. Efficiency of [18F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(9):1236–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1211-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zukotynski K, Lewis A, O’Regan K, Jacene H, Sakellis C, Krajewski K, et al. PET/CT and renal pathology: a blind spot for radiologists? Part I, primary pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(2):W163–7.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.11.7790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minn I, Koo SM, Lee HS, Brummet M, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, et al. [64Cu]XYIMSR-06: a dual-motif CAIX ligand for PET imaging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(35):56471–9.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pan J, Lau J, Mesak F, Hundal N, Pourghiasian M, Liu Z, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors for imaging with positron emission tomography. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2014;29(2):249–55.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2013.773994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lau J, Liu Z, Lin K, Pan J, Zhang Z, Vullo D, et al. Trimeric radiofluorinated sulfonamide derivatives to achieve in vivo selectivity for carbonic anhydrase IX-targeted PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(9):1434–40.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.153288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Hammers HJ, Javadi MS, Hawasli H, Szabo Z, et al. Imaging of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma with PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29(10):877–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-015-1017-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spatz S, Tolkach Y, Jung K, Stephan C, Busch J, Ralla B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of prostate specific membrane antigen expression in the vasculature of renal tumors: implications for imaging studies and prognostic role. J Urol. 2018;199(2):370–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gorin MA, Rowe SP, Hooper JE, Kates M, Hammers HJ, Szabo Z, et al. PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from a rapid autopsy. Eur Urol. 2017;71(1):145–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sawicki LM, Buchbender C, Boos J, Giessing M, Ermert J, Antke C, et al. Diagnostic potential of PET/CT using a 68-Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand in whole-body staging of renal cell carcinoma: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(1):102–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3360-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Behr SC, Aggarwal R, VanBrocklin HF, Flavell RR, Gao K, Small EJ, et al. First-in-human phase I study of CTT1057, a novel 18F labeled imaging agent with phosphoramidate core targeting prostate specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.220715. [Epub ahead of print].
  28. 28.
    Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Solnes LB, Ball MW, Choudhary A, Pierorazio PM, et al. Correlation of 99mTc-sestamibi uptake in renal masses with mitochondrial content and multi-drug resistance pump expression. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(80):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0329-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sheikhbahaei S, Jones CS, Porter KK, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Baras AS, et al. Defining the added value of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT to conventional cross-sectional imaging in the characterization of enhancing solid renal masses. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(4):e188–93.  https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000001534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reynolds AM, Porter KK. Characterizing indeterminate renal masses with molecular imaging: the role of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(86):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0737-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    • Gorin MA, Rowe SP, Baras AS, Solnes LB, Ball MW, Pierorazio PM, et al. Prospective evaluation of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):413–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.056. provides the basis for 99m Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT in differentiating benign renal tumors and indolent RCC from ccRCC.
  32. 32.
    Tzortzakakis A, Gustafsson O, Karlsson M, Ekstrom-Ehn L, Ghaffarpour R, Axelsson R. Visual evaluation and differentiation of renal oncocytomas from renal cell carcinomas by means of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(29):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0278-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sriram R, Gordon J, Baligand C, Ahamed F, Delos Santos J, Qin H, et al. Non-invasive assessment of lactate production and compartmentalization in renal cell carcinomas using hyperpolarized 13C pyruvate MRI. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(9):313.  https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10090313.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(18):10158–63.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1733835100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Girgis H, Masui O, White N, Scorilas A, Rotondo F, Seivwright A, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase A is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2014;13(101):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wettersten HI, Hakimi AA, Morin D, Bianchi C, Johnstone ME, Donohoe DR, et al. Grade-dependent metabolic reprogramming in kidney cancer revealed by combined proteomics and metabolomics analysis. Cancer Res. 2015;75(12):2541–52.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-1703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gerlinger M, Santos CR, Spencer-Dene B, Martinez P, Endesfelder D, Burrell RA, et al. Genome-wide RNA interference analysis of renal carcinoma survival regulators identifies MCT4 as a Warburg effect metabolic target. J Pathol. 2012;227(2):146–56.  https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Keshari KR, Sriram R, Koelsch BL, Van Criekinge M, Wilson DM, Kurhanewicz J, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate magnetic resonance reveals rapid lactate export in metastatic renal cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2013;73(2):529–38.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-3461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nelson SJ, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Larson PE, Harzstark AL, Ferrone M, et al. Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(198):198ra108.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Elias Graybiel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert R. Flavell
    • 1
  • Zhen J. Wang
    • 1
  • Spencer C. Behr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California San Francisco Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations