Advertisement

A Numerical Study of Granular Pile Anchors Subjected to Uplift Forces in Expansive Soils Using PLAXIS 3D

  • Abhishek
  • R. K. Sharma
Original Paper
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

The expansive soils pose lot of problems due to their behaviour of swelling/shrinkage upon wetting or drying. Most part of central India and southern India is covered with layers of expansive soils. Due to the increase in population and increase in per capita demand of land, engineers have to construct various high rise structures on expansive soils which generally pose cracking problems in the buildings. Granular pile anchor is a new technique generally adopted to enhance the uplift resistance of poor expansive soils, such as loose sands, soft clays, black cotton clays etc. This paper presents a numerical study to predict the uplift performance of granular pile anchors (GPA) in expansive soil using 3D finite element PLAXIS software. The effect of length (L), diameter (D), and number of the GPA at different spacing (S) values on uplift capacity is analysed by applying prescribed displacement of 10% of pile diameter at the centre of granular pile anchor. Further, length to diameter (L/D) ratio of single pile and group pile was analysed using different parameters. The resistance of granular pile anchors against uplift forces with variation of modulus of elasticity of soil is also analysed. Based on the numerical analysis, it is observed that the uplift capacity of granular pile anchor increased with increase in length and diameter of pile for both single pile and piles arranged in a group. Further, on increasing value of modulus of elasticity of soil, there is increase in pullout resistance. The efficiency of GPA is also evaluated which helps in the selection of various parameters of granular pile anchor.

Keywords

Expansive soil Granular pile anchor Uplift capacity Upward movement PLAXIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Subba Rao KS (1999) Swell–shrink behaviour of expansive soils—geotechnical challenges. Indian Geotech J 30(3):1–69Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen FH (1980) Foundations on expansive soils. Elsevier Scientific, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson DJ, Miller JD (1992) Expansive soils—problems and practice in foundation and pavement engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Satyanarayna B (1966) Swelling pressure and related mechanical properties of black cotton soils. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mowafy YM, Nagy AH (2001) The effect of reinforced sand cushion on the behavior of expansive soil using large scale apparatus. J Geotech EngGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phanikumar B (2009) Expansive soils—problems and remedies. GEOTIDE, Indian geotechnical conference, Guntur, pp 907–913Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katti R (1979) Search for solutions for problems in black cotton soils. Indian Geotech J 9(1):1–80Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao A (1984) A study of swelling characteristics and behavior of expansive soils. Ph.D. thesis, Kakatiya University, Warangal, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunter D (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing clay soils. J Geotech Eng 114(2):150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sankar N (1989) Use of lime–soil piles for in situ stabilization of black cotton soils. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, vol 1, pp 149–153Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petry TM, Little DN (1992) Update on sulfate-induced heave in treated clays; problematic sulfate levels. Transportation Research Record 1362, pp 51–55Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar V (1996) Fly ash utilization: a mission mode approach: ash ponds and ash disposal systems. Narosa Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rollings M, Rollings R (1996) Geotechnical materials in construction. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Desai I, Oza B (1997) Influence of anhydrous calcium chloride on shear strength of expansive soils. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on expansive soils, HBTI, Kanpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rollings R, Burkes J, Rollings M (1999) Sulphate attack on cement-stabilized sand. Aus J Geod Photogr Surv 125(5):364–372Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phanikumar B (2000) Use of fly ash in treating problematic expansive soils. In: Proceedings of workshop on environment and geotechnics. Indian Geotechnical Society, Hyderabad, pp 36–39Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cokca E (2001) Use of class C fly ash for the stabilization of an expansive soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phanikumar BR, Reddayya SN (2001) Swelling characteristics of fly ash-treated expansive soils. In: Proceedings of international symposium on suction, swelling, permeability, and structure of clays, IS Shizuoka, Japan, pp 121–123Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phanikumar B, Sharma R (2004) Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(7):764–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Acosta H, Edil T, Benson C (2013) Soil stabilization and drying using fly ash. Geotechnical engineering, Report no. 03-03, Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoyos L, Puppala A, Chainuwat P (2004) Dynamic properties of chemically stabilized sulphate rich clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(2):153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leite FDC, Motta RDS, Vasconcelos KL, Bernucci L (2011) Laboratory evaluation of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements. Constr Build Mater 25:2972–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharma RK, Hymavathi J (2016) Effect of fly ash, construction demolition waste and lime on geotechnical characteristics of a clayey soil—a comparative study. Environ Earth Sci J 75(377):1–11Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Setty K, Ravi SA, Manohar C (1966) Behaviour of under-reamed piles in Shedi soil. In: Proceedings of IGC-96, Madras, India, vol 1, pp 286–289Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharma D, Jain M, Prakash C (1978) Handbook on under reamed and bored compaction pile foundations. Central Building Research Institute, RoorkeeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Babu Shanker N, Appayanna M, Shankaraiah B (1980) Design and testing of under—reamed piles. In: Proceedings of geotechnical conference, Bombay, vol 1, pp 203–206Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rao BG (1980) What techniques other than under-reamed piles have proven to be effective in minimising foundation problems in black cotton soils?—Response paper to the question. Indian Geotech Conf New Delhi 2:145–149Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dey A, Minda R, Gurung K (1996) A case study on under-reamed piles. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference and exhibition on piling and deep foundations, BombayGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    IS: 2911 (Part III) (1980) Indian standard code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations, under—reamed piles. Bureau of Indian standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Poulos H, Davis E (1980) Pile foundation analysis and design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dinesh M (1991) Pile foundations. Oxford and IBH Publishing Corporation Private Limited, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Subba Rao KS (1991) Swell–shrink behaviour of expansive soils—geotechnical challenges. Indian Geotech J 27(3):1–69Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kranthikumar A, Sawant V, Kumar P, Shukla S (2017) Numerical and experimental investigations of granular anchor piles in loose sandy soil subjected to uplift loading. Int J Geomech 17(2):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rao BG (1982) Behaviour of skirted granular piles. Ph.D. thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ranjan G (1989) Ground treated with granular piles and its response under load. Indian Geotech J 19(1):1–86Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Greenwood D (1970) Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surface. In: Proceedings of ground engineering conference, Institute of Civil Engineering, London, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hughes J, Withers N (1974) Reinforcing of soft cohesive soils with stone columns. Ground Eng 17(3):42–49Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Datye K, Nagaraju S (1981) Design approach and field control for stone columns. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on soil mechanics and found engineering, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ranjan G, Rao BG (1986) Skirted granular piles for ground improvement. In: Proceedings of 8th European conference on soil mechanics and found engineering, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Deb K, Basudhar PK, Chandra S (2007) Generalized model for geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill-soft soil with stone columns. Int J Geomech 4:266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deb K, Shiyamalaa S (2015) Effect of clogging on rate of consolidation of stone column-improved ground by considering particle migration. Int J Geomech 16:1943–5622Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Phanikumar B, Prasada G, Srirama A (1994) Use of anchored granular column in minimising swell in expansive clays. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, Warangal, India, pp 61–65Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Phanikumar B (1997) A study of swelling characteristics of and granular pile anchor foundation system in expansive soils. Ph.D. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Phanikumar B, Sharma RS, Srirama RA, Madhav MR (2004) Granular pile anchor foundation (GPAF) system for improving the engineering behavior of expansive clay beds. Geotech Test J 27(3):279–287Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Srirama A, Phanikumar B, Dayakar R, Suresh K (2007) Pullout behavior of granular pile-anchors in expansive clay beds in-sit. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(5):531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    HariKrishna P, Murthy V (2013) Pull-out capacity of granular anchor piles in expansive soils. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 5(1):24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    HariKrishna P (2006) A study on the use of granular anchor piles to control heave of footings resting on expansive soil. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Kakatiya University, WarangalGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kranthikumar A, Sawant V, Shukla S (2016) Numerical modeling of granular anchor pile system in loose sandy soil subjected to uplift loading. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(15):1–7Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    HariKrishna P, Murthy V, Nachiappan P (2013) Pull out behaviour of granular anchor piles—FEM approach. Indian Geotechnical Conference, Roorkee, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ismail M, Shahin M (2011) Finite element analyses of granular pile anchors as a foundation of granular pile-anchor foundations (GPAF) in reactive soils. Int J Geotech Eng 6(2):149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ibrahim SF, Aljornay AN, Aladly AI (2014) Heave behaviour of granular pile anchor-foundation (GPA-foundation) system in expansive soil. J Civ Eng 4(3):213–222Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Phani Kumar B (2013) Influence of geogrid reinforcement on pullout response of granular pile-anchors (GPAs) in expansive soils. Indian Geotech J 46(4):437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Randolph M, Carter J, Wroth C (1979) Driven piles in clay—the effects of installation and subsequent consolidation. Geotechnique 29(4):361–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gibson R, Anderson W (1961) In situ measurement of soil properties with the pressure meter. Civ Eng Public Works Rev 56(658):615–618Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McCabe B, Killeen M, Egan D (2008) Challenges faced in 3-D finite element modelling of stone column construction. In: Proceedings of joint symposium on concrete research and bridge and infrastructure research in Ireland, Galileo Editions, Galway, Ireland, pp 393–400Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Geotechnical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentNITHamirpurIndia

Personalised recommendations