Advertisement

Indian Geotechnical Journal

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 170–183 | Cite as

Estimation of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Footings on Soft Clay from Plate Load Test Data Considering Variability

  • Parbin Sultana
  • Ashim Kanti DeyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 176 Downloads

Abstract

The ultimate bearing capacity of a foundation can be determined from the load–settlement response obtained from plate load tests. For clayey soil it is known that the ultimate bearing capacity of footing is equal to that of a test plate. However, the present study shows that it varies with the variation of type of loading, size and shape of test plate and soil consistency. For reaction type of loading, the load is observed as normally distributed random variable with an average co-efficient of variation of 0.018. For different shape and size of plates, the bearing pressure–settlement curves show a high degree of variation. Subsequently the bearing pressures and settlements are normalized to dimensionless parameters and the normalized plot shows a reduction in variability. Further, the normalized curves are fitted to the hyperbolic model by nonlinear regression with non-constant variance. The model parameters, their standard errors, 95% confidence intervals and co-efficient of determination are quantified. The horizontal asymptote of the hyperbolic model has been used to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity. This method yields a value very close to other conventional bearing capacity methods. A sensitivity analysis shows the influence of various parameters on the bearing pressure.

Keywords

Soft clay Uncertainty Normalized load–settlement curve Hyperbolic model Non linear regression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Prof. G. L. Sivakumar Babu (Professor, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) for his suggestions in writing this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Lavanya C, Srirama Rao A (2017) Study of swelling potential of copper slag cushion laid over expansive soil bed. Indian Geotech J 47(3):280–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0227-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pedarla A, Acharya R, Bheemasetti T, Puppala AJ, Hoyos LR (2016) Influence of mineral montmorillonite on soil suction modeling parameters of natural expansive clays. Indian Geotech J 46(3):291–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-015-0175-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Degroot DJ, Poirier SE, Landon MM (2005) Sample disturbance—soft clays. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. XXVII 3–4:91–105Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kempfert HG, Gebreselassie B (2006) Excavations and foundations in soft soils. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    La Rochelle P, Sarrailth J, Tavenas F, Roy M, Leroneil S (1981) Causes of sampling disturbance and design of a new sampler for sensitive soils. Can Geotech J 18:52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hillier RP (1992) The plate test on clay—a finite element study. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Surrey. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/2776/1/314474.pdf
  7. 7.
    Kesavan G, Chandrasekaran SS (2016) Factors influencing the behaviour of flexible pile groups under lateral loading in soft clay. Indian Geotech J 46(2):141–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-015-0159-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phanikumar BR (2016) Influence of geogrid reinforcement on pullout response of granular pile-anchors (GPAs) in expansive soils. Indian Geotech J 46(4):437–444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0180-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borthakur N, Dey AK (2017) Experimental investigation on load carrying capacity of micropiles in soft clay. Arab J Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2894-3 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dash SK, Bora MC (2013) Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotext Geomembr 41:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghazavi M, Afshar JN (2013) Bearing caspacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 38:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Debnath P, Dey AK (2017) Bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over encased stone columns in soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 45:653–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ornek M, Laman M, Demir A, Yildiz A (2012) Prediction of bearing capacity of circular footings on soft clay stabilized with granular soil. Soils Found 52(1):69–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Warmate T (2014) Bearing capacity determination using plate load test in calabar, South-Eastern Nigeria. EJGE 19:4577–4588Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haldar S, Babu GLS (2008) Probabilistic analysis of load–settlement response from pile load tests. Georisk 2(2):79–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17499510802087155 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haldar S, Babu GLS (2008) Load resistance factor design of axially loaded pile based on load test results. J Geotech Geoenviron 134(8):1106–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1106) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dasaka SM (2012) Risk analysis of bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Workshop on emerging trends in geotechnical engineering, Guwahati, 8th June 2012Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sultana P, Dey A K (2016) Estimation of uncertainty during reaction loading in plate load tests. In: Indian geotechnical conference, Chennai, 15–17 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Punmia BC, Jain AK, Jain AK (2000) Soil mechanics and foundations, 13th edn. Laxmi Publications Pvt. Ltd., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Consoli NC, Schnaid F, Milititsky J (1998) Interpretation of plate load tests on residual soil site. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(9):857–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Briaud JL, Gibbens R (1999) Behaviour of five large spread footings in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(9):787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    da Fonseca V (2001) Load tests on residual soil and settlement prediction on shallow foundation. J Geotech Geoenviron 127(10):869–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee J, Salgado R (2002) Estimation of footing settlement in sand. Int J Geomech 2(1):1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2:1(1) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith-Pardo JP, Bobet A (2007) Behavior of rigid footings on gravel under axial load and moment. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(10):1203–1215.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:10(1203) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verma SK, Jain PK, Kumar R (2013) Prediction of bearing capacity of granular layered soils by plate load test. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud II(III):142–149Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shirvani RA, Shooshpasha I (2015) Experimental study on load–settlement behaviour of cement stabilised footing with different dimensions on sandy soil. Arab J Sci Eng 40:397–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1444-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Akbas SO, Kulhawy FH (2009) Axial compression of footings in cohesionless soils. I: load–settlement behavior. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(11):1562–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Najjar SS, Saad M (2011) Bayesian updating of load settlement curves for footings on cohesionless soil. GeoRisk 2011:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sitharam TG, Hegde A (2013) Design and construction of geocell foundation to support the embankment on settled red mud. Geotext Geomembr 41:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    IS: 1888–1982 (Reaffirmed 2002), Indian standard method of load test on soils, Bureau of Indian StandardsGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yadu L, Tripathi RK (2013) Effect of the length of geogrid layers in the bearing capacity ratio of geogrid reinforced granular fill-soft subgrade soil system. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 104:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    ASTM D1196/D1196M-12 (2012) Standard test method for nonrepetitive static plate load tests of soils and flexible pavement components, for use in evaluation and design of airport and highway pavements. ASTM International.  https://doi.org/10.1520/d1196-12
  33. 33.
    ASTM D1195/D1195M-0 (2015) Standard test method for repetitive static plate load tests of soils and flexible pavement components, for use in evaluation and design of airport and highway pavements. ASTM International.  https://doi.org/10.1520/d1195_d1195m-09r15
  34. 34.
    ASTM D5780-10 (2010) Standard test methods for individual piles in permafrost under static axial compressive load. ASTM International.  https://doi.org/10.1520/d5780-10
  35. 35.
    Zhang L, Tang WH, Zhang L, Zheng J (2004) Reducing uncertainty of prediction from empirical correlations. J Geotech Geoenviron 130(5):526–534.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:5(526) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ching J, Phoon KK, Chen YC (2010) Reducing shear strength uncertainties in clays by multivariate correlations. Can Geotech J 47:16–33.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dasaka SM, Jain A, Kolekar YA (2014) Effect of uncertainties in the field load testing on the observed load–settlement response. Indian Geotech J 44(3):294–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0083-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhu F, Clark JI, Phillips R (2001) Scale effect of strip and circular footings resting on dense sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Oh WT, Vanapalli SK (2013) Scale effect of plate load tests in unsaturated soils. Int J GEOMATE 4(2):585–594Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Briaud JL (2007) Spread footings in sand: load settlement curve approach. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(8):905–920.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:8(905) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 96(SM5):1629–1653Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stark TD, Vettel JJ (1991) Effective stress hyperbolic stress–strain parameters for clay. Geotech Test J GTJODJ 14(2):146–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Abdul-kareem AH, Helal A (2007) Estimation of hyperbolic stress–strain parameters for gypseous soils. IJCE, 7th issueGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Murugan RBA, Stalin VK (2009) Soil behaviour and hyperbolic model. IGC 2009, Guntur, India, pp 632–636Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Likitlersuang S, Surarak C, Balasubramania A, Oh E, Syeung RK, Wanatowski D (2013) Duncan-Chang-parameters for hyperbolic stress strain behaviour of soft Bangkok clay. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, pp 381–384Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pratibha R, Babu GLS, Latha GM (2015) Stress–strain response of unbound granular materials under static and cyclic loading. Indian Geotech J 45(4):449–457.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-015-0155-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ang AHS, Tang WH (2014) Probability concepts in engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2004) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kay JN, Parry RHE (1982) Screw plate tests in a stiff clay. Ground Eng 15(6):22–30Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jong Y-H, Lee C-I (2004) Influence of geological conditions on the powder factor for tunnel blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Geotechnical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNIT SilcharSilcharIndia

Personalised recommendations