Advertisement

Motorcycle Drag Reduction using a Streamlined Object Ahead of the Rider

  • Thirukumaran Selvamuthu
  • Murugan ThangaduraiEmail author
Original Contribution
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Aerodynamics design of various components plays a significant role in reducing the overall drag of the vehicle to improve the fuel efficiency. In the present study, the effects of a semi-ellipsoidal structure placed ahead of a rider on the HONDA CBR 600 RR bike have been studied in detail for Reynolds number varying from 1.24 to 3.72 million. Three-dimensional numerical simulations were performed by solving the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations with the SST k–ω turbulence model. The numerical results were validated with the wind tunnel testing performed on a 1:12 scale down model using an external pyramidal balance. It has been observed that the wake pattern behind the vehicle, pressure and velocity distribution over the vehicle were modified remarkably by the inclusion of semi-ellipsoidal structure compared to the model with the rider. The drag coefficient of the bike was increased about 16% by placing a dummy rider over the vehicle. However, it decreased substantially and reached close to the base model value when the semi-ellipsoidal structure placed ahead of the rider. Further, the inclusion of semi-ellipsoidal structure produced a negative lift which improves the traction on the road compared to the base model.

Keywords

Bike aerodynamics CFD Wind tunnel testing Turbulence modeling Drag reduction 

References

  1. 1.
    R.M. Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values (William Morrow & Company, USA, 1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Shuhei, Fuel cell powered motor cycles. J. Soc. Automot. Eng. Jpn. 60(1), 90–93 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Blocken, Y. Toparlar, T. Andrianne, Aerodynamic benefit for a cyclist by a following motorcycle. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 155, 1–10 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Sedlak, Motorcycle Cornering Improvement: An Aerodynamical Approach based on Flow Interference. Master Thesis, Department of Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.J.N. Limebeer, R.S. Sharp, Bicycles, motorcycles, and models. IEEE Control Syst. 26(5), 34–61 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Evangelou, D.J.N. Limebeer, R.S. Sharp, M.C. Smith, Steering compensators for high-performance motorcycles. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 74(5), 332–346 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foale T, Motorcycle Handling and Chassis Design, the art and science. Tony Foale Designs (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Takahashi, Y. Kurakawa, H. Sugita, T. Ishima, T. Obokata, CFD Analysis of Airflow around the Rider of a Motorcycle for Rider Comfort Improvement. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1155 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Cooper, The Effect of Handlebar Fairings on Motorcycle Aerodynamics. SAE Technical Paper 830156 (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Angle, W. Huebsch, Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of a Racing Motorcycle through Vortex Generation. SAE Technical Paper 2003-32-0037 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Araki, K. Gotou, Development of Aerodynamic Characteristics for Motorcycles Using Scale Model Wind Tunnel. SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1851 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Ubertini, U. Desideri, Aerodynamic Investigation of a Scooter in the University of Perugia Wind Tunnel Facility. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0254 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Piccioni, F. Cianetti, A. Paolotti, Numerical Investigations on the Front Fender of a Motorcycle. SAE Technical Paper 970412 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Angeletti, L. Sclafani, G. Bella, S. Ubertini, The Role of CFD on the Aerodynamic Investigation of Motorcycles. SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0997 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Shimizu, T. Abe, Y. Sunayama, S. Watanabe, E. Nakamura, Simultaneous Evaluation on Aerodynamics and Air-cooling Performances for Motorcycle using CFD Analysis. SAE Technical Paper 2009-32-0138 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Blocken, 50 years of computational wind engineering: past, present and future. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 129, 69–102 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Blocken, Computational fluid dynamics for urban physics: importance, scales, possibilities, limitations and ten tips and tricks towards accurate and reliable simulations. Build. Environ. 91, 1–27 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Del Cerro Turner, Y. Yao, D. Marchant D, Motorcycle Aerodynamic Performance Improvement through Belly Pan Designs Evaluation and Testing. SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1167 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Sharma, D.J.N. Limebeer, Design of a Novel Aerodynamically Efficient Motorcycle. in Proceedings, Bicycle and Motorcycle Dynamics, 20–22 October (Delft, Netherlands, 2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.N. Doval, Aerodynamic analysis and drag coefficient evaluation of time-trial bicycle riders. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C-H. Bruneau, I. Mortazavi, P. Gilliéron, Passive control around the two-dimensional square back ahmed body using porous devices. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 130, 061101 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Liu, J. Wei, Z. Qu, The interaction of porous material coating with the near wake of bluff body. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 136, 021302 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Van Wely, Design and disease. Appl. Ergonom. 1, 262–269 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Helander, A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd edn. (CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2006), pp. 167–179Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Karmegam, M.Y. Ismail, S.M. Sapuan, N. Ismail, Conceptual design and prototype of an ergonomic back-leaning posture support for motorbike riders. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 67, 599–604 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Fintelman, H. Hemida, M. Sterling, F.-X. Li, A numerical investigation of the flow around a motorbike when subjected to crosswinds. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 9(1), 528–542 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Tominaga, A. Mochida, R. Yoshie, H. Kataoka, T. Nozu, M. Yoshikawa, T. Shirasawa, AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96, 1749–1761 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Franke, Recommendations of the COST action C14 on the use of CFD in predicting pedestrian wind environment. The Fourth International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering, Yokohama, Japan (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.A. Kleber, Simulation of air flow around an OPEL STRAA vehicle with FLUENT. J. Artic. Flu. Softw. JA 132, 1–6 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Murugan, M. Singh, K. Vinoth, P.K. Chatterjee, in Effect of FST on Sub-Critical Flow Past a Circular Cylinder: An Experimental Investigation. FMFP2014, Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power – Contemporary Research (2016), pp. 1253–1262Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThiagarajar College of EngineeringMaduraiIndia
  2. 2.Energy Research and Technology Group Thermal Engineering DepartmentCSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research InstituteDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations