Advertisement

Active Vibration Control using Air Spring

  • Surbhi RazdanEmail author
  • P. J. Awasare
  • Suresh Y. Bhave
Original Contribution
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, a novel method of active vibration control of machines subject to base excitation using air spring is proposed. The study also includes proposes of a feedback control system, for active vibration control with mass flow rate as a function of the velocity of the mass, and/or base of air spring. Earlier study shows application of air spring as a force actuator. The mass flow introduces additional input excitation into the system by means of which the stiffness or resultant excitation force on the mass can be changed. A mathematical model is developed and response to steady state and transient base input are obtained. The use of appropriate value of gain in the system can ensure that the amplitude of response to excitation from the base is lower than the amplitude of base excitation. Some suitable values of gain depending on the special cases considered are suggested. An active control system with mass flow rate as a function of base velocity and gain equal to − 1 is most effective in controlling the vibration. This is highly desirable in case of high precision equipment. The interesting observation is that the spring rate can be changed and even made negative.

Keywords

Air spring Active vibration control Controlled mass flow Spring rate Pneumatic vibration control 

Notations

A

Area of cross section of air spring, m2

c

Damping coefficient of air spring, Ns/m

M

Mass of the machine, kg

P

Pressure in the air spring, Pa

R

Universal gas constant, kJ/kgK−1

T

Temperature of air, °K

v

Volume of air spring, m3

x

Mass displacement (machine displacement), m

y

Base displacement (ground displacement), m

\(\dot{\text{m}}\)

Mass flow rate, kg/s

\(\dot{\text{p}}\)

Rate of change of pressure, Pa/s

\(\dot{\text{x}}\)

Mass velocity, m/s

\(\dot{\text{y}}\)

Base velocity, m/s

\(\upeta_{1}\)

Gain for mass flow rate as a function of base velocity

\(\upeta_{2}\)

Gain for mass flow rate as a function of mass velocity

\(\upomega_{\text{n}}\)

Natural frequency, rad/s

\(\upgamma\)

Adiabatic gas constant

\(\upeta\)

Gain for mass flow rate as a function of difference between mass velocity and base velocity

\(\upxi\)

Damping ratio of air spring

References

  1. 1.
    C. Collette, S. Janssens, K. Artoos, Review of active vibration isolation strategies. Recent Patents Mecha. Eng. 4, 212–219 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Kerber, S. Hurlebaus, B.M. Beadle, U. Stöbener, Control concepts for an active vibration isolation system. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21, 3042–3059 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.-H. Shin, K.-J. Kim, Performance enhancement of pneumatic vibration isolation tables in low frequency range by time delay control. J. Sound Vib. 321, 537–553 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Alkhatib, M.F. Golnaraghi, Active structural vibration control: a review. Shock Vib. Dig. 35(5), 367–383 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.-Y. Chen, J.-W. Liang, J.-W. Wu, Active pneumatic vibration control by using pressure and velocity measurements and active fuzzy sliding mode controller. Sensors 13, 8431–8444 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y.-H. Shin, K.-J. Kim, Performance enhancement of pneumatic vibration isolation tables in low frequency range by time delay control. J. Sound Vib. 321, 537–553 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.T. Chen, C.H. Chou, S.H. Chang, Y.H. Liu, Intelligent active vibration control in an isolation platform. Appl. Acoust. 69, 1063–1084 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Ballo, Active vibration control systems for driver’s seat of earth-moving vehicles. Arch. Acoust. 18(2), 183–195 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Law, M. Wabner, A. Colitz, M. Kolouch, S. Noack, S. Ihlenfeldt, Active vibration isolation of machine tools using an electro-hydraulic actuator. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 10, 36–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.H.H. Marazi, M. Khazaee, Control of input delayed pneumatic vibration isolation table using adaptive fuzzy sliding mode. Latin Am. J. Solids Struct. 12, 1525–1539 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Krishna, H. Kumar, K. Ganghadharan, Optimization of magneto-rheological damper for maximizing magnetic flux density in the fluid flow gap through FEA and GA approaches. J. Inst. Eng. India. Ser. C (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0251-z Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Zhang, H. Huang, R. Chen, M. He. Studies on modeling a single-bellows air spring and simulating its inherent characteristics. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Engineering for Mechanics and Materials-ICIMM 2015, pp. 1551–1554Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.V.H. Rao, M.S.S.S. Rao, B.V. Apparao et al., A study on design and analysis of hybrid vibration damper with energy harvesting and optimal damping effect. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 95, 97 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-014-0115-3 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.-H. Moon, B.-G. Lee, Modeling and sensitivity analysis of a pneumatic vibration isolation system with two air chambers. Mech. Mach. Theory 45, 1828–1850 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.Y. Bhave, Effect of connecting the front and rear air suspensions of a vehicle on the transmissibility of road undulation inputs. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 21(1), 225–245 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H.-T. Kim, C.-H. Kim, S.-B. Choi, S.-J. Moon, W.-G. Song, A novel triple-actuating mechanism of an active air mount for vibration control of precision manufacturing machines: experimental work. Smart Mater. Struct. 23, 077003 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Kato, K. Kawashima, K.Tadano Tatsuya, T. Kagawa. A new, high precision, quick response pressure regulator for active control of pneumatic vibration isolation tables. Precis. Eng. 34, 43–48 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.Y. Bhave, Transient response of an air spring -tank system. IE(I) J. MC 77, 103–111 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Yoshioka, Y. Takahashi, K. Katayama, T. Imazawa, N. Murai, An active microvibration isolation system for hi-tech manufacturing facilities. ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 123, 269 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.-H. Chang, D.K. Han, Y.-H. Shin, K.-J. Kim, Effective suppression of pneumatic vibration isolators by using input–output linearization and time delay control. J. Sound Vib. 329, 1636–1652 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Razdan, S.Y. Bhave, P.J. Awasare, Comparison of quarter car model of active pneumatic suspensions using mass flow control for a small car. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 597–561, 2 (2014). (special issue) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P.K. Nag, Engineering Thermodynamics, 5th edn. (Tata McGraw-Hill Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sinhgad College of EngineeringPuneIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Armament Technology, DRDOPune 411025India

Personalised recommendations