Advertisement

Investigation on Buckling Behaviour of GFRP Angle Sections with Bolted Connections in Lattice Towers

  • R. BalagopalEmail author
  • N. Prasad Rao
  • R. P. Rokade
Original Contribution
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) angle is an emerging alternative material to conventional steel angle sections in transmission line (TL)/communication towers, because of their superior characteristics such as high strength to weight ratio, high tensile strength, better corrosion resistance, light in weight for handling and transportation, etc. The GFRP angle sections are used as leg, bracing, tie and redundant members in towers, in which these members are subjected to reversal of tensile and compressive forces due to wind. The compression strength is mainly governed by the buckling characteristics of angle sections. There is lack of design criteria concerning the use of GFRP angle sections with bolted connections in lattice towers. In the present study, experimental investigation is conducted on concentrically loaded GFRP angle sections with bolted connections in TL/communication towers. The material properties were determined based on compression and in-plane shear coupon test. The existing mathematical model to determine the buckling characteristics such as torsional–flexural, flexure and pure torsion is considered. The theoretical approach to determine its limiting effective length governing the transition from torsional–flexural to flexural buckling mode for GFRP angle sections with bolted connections is proposed in this paper. The proposed formulation is validated with experimental investigation conducted at component level on GFRP angle sections with bolted connections at both ends for different slenderness ratios ranging from 40 to 100 along with numerical investigation using FEA software, ANSYS. Experimental investigation was also carried out for validation at sub-structural level on ‘X’-braced panel made entirely of GFRP angle sections. The panel failed prematurely during testing, and the reason for this failure was observed due to excessive bending stress exerted on the free length of stub member. Based on the results of the investigations, suitable recommendations for use of GFRP angle sections in lattice tower are proposed.

Keywords

GFRP angle Torsional–flexural buckling Flexural buckling Limiting effective length Transmission/communication towers GFRP X-braced panel 

List of Symbols

σc

Ultimate compressive stress

τc

Shear stress

Ex, Ey and Ez

Young’s modulus along x, y and z directions

Gxy, Gyz and Ezx

Shear modulus along xy, yz and zx planes

μxy, μzx

Poisson’s ratio

KL

Effective length

(KL)lim, tf

Limiting effective length for torsional–flexural buckling

Puu, Pvv

Flexural buckling load about uu and vv axes

Ptt

Torsional buckling load

Ptf

Torsional–flexural buckling load

J

Torsional rigidity

Cw

Warping constant

Iuu, Ivv

Moment of inertia along uu and vv axes

Ip

Polar moment of inertia

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the staff of Tower Testing and Research Station for their help and support in conducting the experiments. This paper is being published with the kind permission of The Director, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai, INDIA.

References

  1. 1.
    L.C. Bank, Shear properties of pultruded glass FRP materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2(2), 118–122 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.J. Barbero, I.G. Raftoyiannis, Euler buckling of pultruded composite columns. Compos. Struct. 24(2), 139–147 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Barbero, Structural design equation for FRP columns. Mater. Eng. 6(1–2), 197–210 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Zureick, D. Scott, Short-term behaviour and design of fiber-reinforced polymeric slender members under axial compression. J. Compos. Constr. 1(4), 140–149 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.J. Barbero, S. Makkapati, J.S. Tomblin, Experimental determination of the compressive strength of pultruded structural shapes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 59(13), 2047–2054 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Zureick, R. Steffen, Behavior and design of concentrically loaded pultruded angle struts. J. Struct. Eng. 126(3), 406–416 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.M. Roberts, Influence of shear deformation on buckling of pultruded fiber reinforced plastic profiles. J. Compos. Constr. 6(4), 241–248 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Seangatith, Buckling strength of GFRP equal-leg angle structural members under concentric axial compression. Suranaree J. Sci. Technol. 12(3), 230–242 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.K. Hassan, A.S. Mosallam, Buckling and ultimate failure of thin-walled pultruded composite columns. Polym. Polym. Compos. 12(6), 469–481 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.T. Mottram, Shear modulus of standard pultruded fiber reinforced plastic material. J. Compos. Constr. 8(2), 141–147 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Evernden, J. Smith, Concentric and eccentric compression tests on PFRP equal angles, in Advanced Composites in Construction 2011, ACIC 2011: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. (Warwick, 2011), pp. 406–417Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Godat, F. Légeron, V. Gagné, B. Marmion, Use of FRP pultruded members for electricity transmission towers. Compos. Struct. 105, 408–421 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Selvaraj, S.M. Kulkarni, R.R. Babu, Behavioral analysis of built-up transmission line tower from FRP pultruded sections. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2(9), 39–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.C. Cardoso, B.S. Togashi, Experimental investigation on the flexural-torsional buckling behavior of pultruded GFRP angle columns. Thin Walled Struct. 125, 269–280 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Zhan, G. Wu, K.A. Harries, Determination of critical load for global flexural buckling in concentrically loaded pultruded FRP structural struts. Eng. Struct. 158, 1–12 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N.P. Rao, R.P. Rokade, R. Balagopal, Failure investigation of GFRP communication towers. Eng. Fail. Anal. 79, 397–407 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Polyzois, I.G. Raftoyiannis, Compression strength of pultruded equal leg angle sections. Struct. Eng. Mech. 9(6), 541–555 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Bleich, Buckling Strength of Metal Structures, Engineering Society Monographs (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1952)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM D3410/D3410M95, Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading (ASTM, West Conshohoken, 1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASTM D5379/5379-M-93, Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Composite Materials by the V-Notched Beam Method (ASTM, West Conshohoken, 1983)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N.S. Trahair, Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures (E& FN Spon, Chapman & Hall Publishers, London, 1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ASCE 10–15, Design of Latticed Steel Transmission Structures (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, 2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    IS 802 (Part 1, Sec 2), Use of Structural Steel in Overhead Transmission line towers—Code of practice (Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TTRS, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research CentreChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations