Advertisement

Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Micro- and Nano-additives-Based Modified Concrete Composites: A Sustainable Solution

  • Mohammed Arif
  • Mohammed Gamal Al-Hagri
  • M. Shariq
  • I. Rahman
  • Amer HassanEmail author
  • Abdul Baqi
Original Contribution
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The present study focuses on the effect of cement replacement with micro-silica fume (SF), nano-silica fume (NS) and fly ash (F) individually and in a combination of two additives, on the mechanical properties (split, flexural tensile and compressive strengths) of 22 modified concrete mixes. The microstructure analysis and chemical microanalysis of the mixes have also been undertaken. The addition of micro- and nano-silica fume alone enhances the strength of concrete. However, the addition of fly ash causes a reduction in the strength properties for all replacement percentages. The combination of micro- and nano-silica fume improves the mechanical properties of concrete for all percentages of replacement. The microstructure and chemical analysis of modified concrete show enhancement in the morphological properties of concrete owing to pore filling with dense and compact structure and C–H crystals reduction and denser structure in pastes due to the incorporation of micro- and nano-silica fume. The present experimental research shows that the concrete modified with industrial by-products establishes extra functionalities, thus well addressing the environmental sustainability issues.

Keywords

Micro-additives Nano-additives Modified concrete composites Mechanical properties Microstructure analysis 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    E. Gartner, Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cem. Concr. Res. (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Shi, K. Zheng, A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Schneider, M. Romer, M. Tschudin, H. Bolio, Sustainable cement production-present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Chen, G. Habert, Y. Bouzidi, A. Jullien, Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation. J. Clean. Prod. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Benhelal, G. Zahedi, E. Shamsaei, A. Bahadori, Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.M.S. Islam, M.H. Rahman, N. Kazi, Waste glass powder as partial replacement of cement for sustainable concrete practice. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.K. Agarwal, Pozzolanic activity of various siliceous materials. Cem. Concr. Res. (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Tangchirapat, T. Saeting, C. Jaturapitakkul, K. Kiattikomol, A. Siripanichgorn, Use of waste ash from palm oil industry in concrete. Waste Manag. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. De Brito, J. Ferreira, J. Pacheco, D. Soares, M. Guerreiro, Structural, material, mechanical and durability properties and behaviour of recycled aggregates concrete. J. Build Eng. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Ready Mixed Concrete Association N. CIP 36—Structural Lightweight Concrete. 2016Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Mazloom, A.A. Ramezanianpour, J.J. Brooks, Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Cem Concr Compos (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00017-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Pala, E. Özbay, A. Öztaş, M.I. Yuce, Appraisal of long-term effects of fly ash and silica fume on compressive strength of concrete by neural networks. Constr. Build. Mater. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Yazici, The effect of silica fume and high-volume Class C fly ash on mechanical properties, chloride penetration and freeze-thaw resistance of self-compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Li, Properties of high-volume fly ash concrete incorporating nano-SiO 2. Cem. Concr. Res. (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Collepardi, S. Collepardi, U. Skarp, R. Troli, Optimization of silica fume, fly ash and amorphous nano-silica in superplasticized high-performance concrete. ACI Spec Publ (2004).  https://doi.org/10.14359/13273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khanzadi M, Tadayon M, Sepehri H, Sepehri M, Influence of nano-silica particles on mechanical properties and permeability of concrete, in 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 2010Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nili M, Ehsani A, Shabani K, Influence of nano-SiO2 and microsilica on concrete performance, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies 2010Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Bi, I. Pane, B. Hariandja, I. Imran, The Use of Nanosilica for Improving of Concrete Compressive Strength and Durability. Appl. Mech. Mater. (2012).  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208.4059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.H. Zhang, J. Islam, S. Peethamparan, Use of nano-silica to increase early strength and reduce setting time of concretes with high volumes of slag. Cem Concr Compos (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Aggarwal, R.P. Singh, Y. Aggarwal, Use of nano-silica in cement based materials—A review. Cogent Eng (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1078018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Wahab, B.D. Kumar, M. Bhaskar, S. Vijaya Kumar, B.L.P. Swami, Concrete composites with nano silica, condensed silica fume and fly ash—study of strength properties. Int J Sci Eng Res 4, 1–4 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.S. Sai, Comparative studies on high strength concrete mixes using micro silica and nanosilica. IJETR 1, 29–34 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.K. Ibrahim, F.R. Ahmed, The effect of nanosilica in compensating the strength loss caused by using high volume fly ash in high strength mortars. Int J Eng Sci Innov Technol 4, 232–241 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Priyadarshana, R. Dissanayake, P. Mendis, Effects of nano silica, micro silica, fly ash and bottom ash on compressive strength of concrete. J Civ Eng Archit 9, 1146–1152 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bureau of Indian Standard(BIS). Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Test 2005.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM. Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures. ASTM C1240 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1520/c1240-14.2
  27. 27.
    IS 3812(part-1):2003. Indian Standard Pulverized Fuel Ash- Specification. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi, India 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200402138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    IS:2386 (Part-1). Method of Test for Aggregate for Concrete. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi 1963Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 456: 2000—Plain and Reinforced Concrete—Code and Practice. Fourth. New Delhi 2000Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bureau of Indian Standards:10262-2009. Concrete Mix Proportioning—Guidelines. Bur Indian Stand 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    IS516. IS516-Testing of concrete. IS516 2004Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    IS:5816. Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi 1999.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-001-0303-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. Senff, D. Hotza, W.L. Repette, V.M. Ferreira, J.A. Labrincha, Effect of nanosilica and microsilica on microstructure and hardened properties of cement pastes and mortars. Adv. Appl. Ceram. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1179/174367509X12502621261659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. Biricik, N. Sarier, Comparative study of the characteristics of nano silica -, silica fume—and fly ash—incorporated cement mortars. Mater Res (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392014005000054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S.A. El-Baky, S. Yehia, S. Khalil Brahim, Influence of Nano-Silica Addition on Properties of Fresh and Hardened Cement Mortar, in 5th International Conference on Nanocon, Brno, Czech Republic: 2013, p. 16–8Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Indian Standards. IS-456: 2000—Plain and Reinforced Concrete—Code of Practice (Fourth Revision). 2000Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. 2014Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    NZS 3101. Concrete Structures Standard, Part 1: The Design of Concrete Structures. Stand Assoc New Zeal 2006Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    British Standards Institution BSI. Structural use of concrete—Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction. Br Stand 1998Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ACI 318-14. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI 48331, U.S.A. 2014Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    CEB-FIP MODEL CODE 1990. Thomas Telford Publishing; 1993.  https://doi.org/10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430
  42. 42.
    N.J. Carino, H.S. Lew, Re-examination of the relation between splitting tensile and compressive strength of normal weight concreTE. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 79, 214–219 (1982)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    F.A. Oluokun, E.G. Burdette, J.H. Deatherage, Splitting tensile strength and compressive strength relationship at early ages. ACI Mater. J. 88, 115–121 (1991)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    N. Arioglu, Z. Canan Girgin, E. Arioglu, Evaluation of ratio between splitting tensile strength and compressive strength for concretes up to 120 MPa and its application in strength criterion. ACI Mater. J. 103, 18–24 (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R.L. Berger, J.D. McGregor, Influence of admixtures on the morphology of calcium hydroxide formed during tricalcium silicate hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. (1972).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(72)90022-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, College of EngineeringQassim UniversityAl-QassimSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringSelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Zakir Husain College of Engineering and TechnologyAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia
  4. 4.Department of Civil EngineeringJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations