Advertisement

Studies on the Strength Development of Lime–Pozzolana Cement–Soil–Brick Powder Based Geopolymer Composites

  • T. K. Jyothi
  • P. T. JithaEmail author
  • S. Karthik Pattaje
  • K. S. Jagadish
  • R. V. Ranganath
  • S. Raghunath
Original Contribution
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

It is well known that geopolymer products can be made using materials that are rich in silica and alumina with alkalis as polymerisation agent. The chemical reaction, also known as poly-condensation, takes place with the assistance of thermal and/or mechanical activation. This paper discusses the production of moderate-strength geopolymer cubes using two sources of locally available raw materials, viz. soil and brick powder (BP). Instead of using industrial by-products such as fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag an attempt has been made to produce lime–pozzolana cement (LPC) on a very small scale and use it as an activator. The major objective was the production of geopolymer cubes which can eventually be used in masonry applications. Initially, a series of tests were conducted, by varying the proportion of soil and brick powder, to produce cubes with moderate strength (3.5–10.0 MPa). The studies revealed that the strength gain was due to contribution of pozzolanic reaction as well as polymerisation. The strength gain has been further enhanced by thermal activation at ambient temperature and mechanical activation by inter-grinding of LPC, BP and soil. This paper provides the details of production and characterisation of LPC and the strength characteristics of geopolymer–LPC-based cubes.

Keywords

Geopolymer Lime–pozzolana cement Soil Brick powder Thermal activation Mechanical activation 

References

  1. 1.
    IS: 1905–1987, Indian standard code of practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. 3rd ed. 1987 Reaffirmed (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.S. Jagadish, B.V. Venkatarama Reddy, K.S. Nanjunda Rao, Alternative Building Materials and Technologies (New Age International (P) Ltd Publishers, Bengaluru, 2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Rai, Building Materials in India, 50 Years: A Commemorative Volume (Building Materials & Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi, 1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Srinivasan, Surkhi as a Pozzolana, Road Research Papers, No.1 (CRRI, New Delhi, 1956)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.R. Yogananda, K.S. Jagadish, R. Kumar, Studies on Surkhi and Rice Husk Ash Pozzolana (ASTRA, IISC, Bengaluru, 1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Moises, J. Cabrera, Influence of MK on the reaction kinetics in MK/lime and MK-blended cement systems at 20°C. Cem. Concret. Res. 31(4), 519–527 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00465-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Allahverdi, J. Ghorbani, Chemical Activation and Set Acceleration of Lime-Natural-Pozzolana Cement. Ceram. Silik. 50(4), 193–199 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Burciaga-Diaz, J.I. Escalante-Garcia, A.V. Gorokhovsky, Geopolymer based on coarse low-purity kaolin mineral: Mechanical strength as a function of the chemical composition and temperature. Cem. Concr. Compos. 34(1), 18–24 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.A. Abdel-Gawwad, S.A. Abo-El-Enein, A novel method to produce dry geopolymer cement powder. HBRC J. 12(1), 13–24 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.K. Jyothi, Development of geopolymer-lime-pozzolana masonry units/binders using tank-bed soil and brick-powder, PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India. 2017Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.R. Yogananda, K.S. Jagadish, Pozzolanic properties of rice husk ash, burnt clay and red mud. Build. Environ. 23(4), 303–308 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(88)90036-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.K. Jyothi, B.N. Varsha, S. Raghunath, K.S. Jagadish, Embodied energy & cost issues of tank-bed soil-lime based geopolymer adobes. Open Jo. Energy Effic. 6, 128–139 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    IS: 2720 (part 5)-1985, Methods of tests for soil: Determination of liquid and plastic limit, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, Reaffirmed (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IS: 1727–1967, Methods of test for pozzolanic materials, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, Reaffirmed (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IS: 1498-1970, Indian standard code of practice for soil classification, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 3rd edn. (1970)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IS: 4098-1983, Specification for lime-pozzolana mixture, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, Reaffirmed (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Alonso, A. Palomo, Calorimetric study of alkaline activation of calcium hydroxide-metakaolin solid mixtures. Cement and Concrete Research 31, 25–30 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00435-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davidovits J, Soft mineralogy and geopolymers, in: Proceedings of the Geopolymer ‘88 International Conference (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.G.S. Van Jaarsveld, J.S.J. Van Deventer, L. Lorenzen, The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: part I. Theory Appl. Miner. Eng. 10(7), 659–669 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00046-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. K. Jyothi
    • 1
  • P. T. Jitha
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. Karthik Pattaje
    • 3
  • K. S. Jagadish
    • 4
  • R. V. Ranganath
    • 2
  • S. Raghunath
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringGovernment Engineering CollegeRamanagaraIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringBMS College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations