Comparative Study on Tree Diversity and Population Structure in Two Forest Types of Nagaland, India

  • Gaurav MishraEmail author
  • P. K. Das
Research Article


A study was carried out to investigate the population structure and tree species diversity in two different forest types of Nagaland. A total of 40 and 48 quadrats were plotted randomly in subtropical semi evergreen (SSE) and tropical wet evergreen (TWE) forest, respectively; and trees having > 10 cm girth at breast height were measured. Maximum 38 tree species belonging to 25 families in SEE and 30 species belonging to 24 families were recorded in TWE forest. Both the forest types were dominated by the tree species belonging to the Meliaceae family. A total of 613 individuals/ha with 1728.23 m2 basal area were recorded in TWE forest as compared to the 512 individuals/ha with 2363.88 m2 basal area in SSE forest. Shannon and Simpson diversity indices varied from 3.27–2.69 and 0.05–0.10, respectively. Moreover, 30–60 cm girth class showed higher number of individuals followed by 60–90 cm class. Tectona grandis, Gmelina arborea and Duabanga grandiflora were the dominant species in SSE, while TWE was dominated by Gmelina arborea and Grevillea robusta. The present study provides baseline data on population structure and diversity of trees in two forest types of Nagaland.


Eastern Himalaya Nagaland Forest types Tree diversity 



The authors thankfully acknowledge the financial support provided by Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), Dehradun, India, for this study. They also thank to the Department of Forests, Ecology, Environment and Wildlife, Govt. of Nagaland, for granting permission to carry out the field work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Negi SP (2009) Forest cover in Indian Himalayan states-an overview. Indian J For 32:1–5Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan SM, Page S, Ahmad H et al (2012) Vegetation dynamics in the western Himalayas, diversity indices and climate change. Sci Tech Dev 31:232–243Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chettri N, Sharma E, Shakya B, Thapa, et al. (2010) Biodiversity in the Eastern Himalayas: status, trends and vulnerability to climate change; climate change impact and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas—technical report 2. Kathmandu: ICIMOD, NepalGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dar JA, Sundarapandian SM (2015) Variation of biomass and carbon pools with forest type in temperate forests of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Environ Monit Assess 187:55. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown S, Masera Sathaye OJ (2000) Project based activities. In: Watson R, Noble I, Verardo D (eds) Land use, land use change and forestry, vol 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 283–338Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devi LS, Yadava PS (2015) Carbon stock and rate of carbon sequestration in Dipterocarpus forests of Manipur, Northeast India. J For Res 26(2):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Armenteras D, Rodriguez N, Retana J (2009) Are conservation strategies effective in avoiding the deforestation of the Colombian Guyana Shield? Biol Conserv 42:1411–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rahman M, Islam M, Islam R, Sobuj NA (2017) Towards sustainability of tropical forests: implications for enhanced carbon stock and climate change mitigation. J For Environ Sci 33(4):281–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Naidu MT, Kumar OA (2016) Tree diversity, stand structure, and community composition of tropical forests in Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh, India. J Asia-Pacific Biodivers 9:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mishra G, Das PK, Borah R, Dutta A (2017) Investigation of Phytosociological Parameters and Physico-chemical properties in northern tropical semi evergreen Forests of Eastern Himalaya. J For Res 28(3):513–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar JIN, Patel K, Kumar RN, Kumar BR (2011) Forest structure, diversity and soil properties in a dry tropical forest in Rajasthan western India. Ann For Res 54(1):89–98Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nat Lond 403:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singh SK, Kumar SK, Aier B, Kanduri VP, Ahirwar S (2012) Plant community characteristics and soil status in different land use systems in Dimapur district, Nagaland, India. Leoene Prace Badawcze (For Res Papers) 73(4):305–312Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar KS, Aier B, Khanduri VP, Gautam PK, Singh D, Singh SK (2013) Assessment of soil nutrients (N, P, K) status along with tree diversity in different land use systems at Mokokchung, Nagaland, India. Sci Technol J 1(2):42–48Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1950) The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31(3):434–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips EA (1959) Methods of vegetation study. Henry Holt, New York, p 107Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois, Urbana, p 117Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sorensen T (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content. Det. Kong. Danske Vidensk, Selsk Biology Skr (Copenhagen) 5:1–34Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Padalia H, Chauhan N, Porwal MC, Roy PS (2004) Phytosociological observations on tree species diversity of Andaman Islands, India. Curr Sci 87:799–806Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bharali S, Paul A, Khan ML, Singha LB (2011) Species diversity and community structure of a temperate mixed Rhododendron forest along an altitudinal gradient in West Siang District of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Nat Sci 9:125–140Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khali M, Bhatt VP (2014) Community structure of Montane forest along the altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Ecol Nat Environ 6:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khera N, Kumar A, Ram J, Tewari A (2001) Plant biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbance in mid elevation forest of Central Himalaya, India. Tro Ecol 42:83–95Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang W, Pohjonen V, Johasson S, Nashanda M, Katigula MIL, Luukkanen O (2003) Species diversity, forest structure and species composition in Tanzanian tropical forests. For Ecol Manag 173:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mishra G, Marzaioli R, Giri K, Borah R, Dutta A, Jayaraj RSC (2017) Soil quality assessment under shifting cultivation and forests in Northeastern Himalaya of India. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63(10):1355–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh JS, Singh SP, Saxena AK, Rawat YS (1984) India’s Silent valley and its threatened rain forest ecosystem. Environ Conserv 11:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shah S, Tewari A, Tewari B (2009) Impact of human disturbance on forest vegetation and water resources of Nainital catchment. Nat Sci 7:74–78Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaheen H, Ullah Z, Khan SM et al (2012) Species composition and community structure of western Himalayan moist temperate forests in Kashmir. For Ecol Manag 278:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lalfakawma Sahoo UK, Roy S, Vanlalhriatpuia K, Vanalalhluna PC (2009) Community composition and tree population structure in undisturbed and disturbed tropical semi-evergreen forest stands of North-East India. Appl Ecol Environ Res 7:303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sahoo T, Panda PC, Acharya L (2016) Structure, composition and diversity of tree species in tropical moist deciduous forests of Eastern India: a case study of Nayagarh Forest Division, Odisha. J For Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hitimana J, Kiyiapi JL, Njunge JT (2004) Forest structure characteristics in disturbed and undisturbed sites of Mt. Elgon moist lower montane forest, Western Kenya. For Ecol Manag 194:269–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rain Forest Research InstituteJorhatIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Forest ProductivityRanchiIndia

Personalised recommendations