Advertisement

Biochemical Changes Induced by Varying Irrigation Levels During Annual Growth Cycle in Fantasy Seedless (Vitis vinifera L.)

  • Dinesh S. Shetty
  • Ajay Kumar UpadhyayEmail author
  • M. V. Kulkarni
  • Jagdev Sharma
Research Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Presently, a number of commercial varieties of grapes are being introduced with Fantasy Seedless as one of them. Varying irrigation levels lead to biochemical changes affecting the vine productivity. In the present study, five irrigation levels (I) based on variable rates of replenishment of pan evaporation were imposed and the biochemical constituent levels were monitored on the field-grown grapevine cultivar Fantasy Seedless raised on 110R rootstock. During vegetative season, the levels of proline, anthocyanin, reducing sugars and malondialdehyde in leaves were higher in water deficit I-3, whereas it was lower in I-1 at all the stages. This suggests the adaptive response of grapevine leaves to cope and maintain the water stress. On the other hand, the levels of protein were higher in I-1, whereas it was lower in I-3 indicating the protein degradation caused by the oxidative damage under water stress. During fruiting season also, the results showed similar trends for all parameters in leaves. During berry development stages, the changes in composition revealed the protective and adaptive mechanisms by osmolyte accumulation. The irrigation level I-2 based on the yield (17.86 t/ha) and the water use efficiency (71.93 kg/mm) was found significantly superior over I-3, I-4 and I-5 with low applied irrigation. This study provides insights into the adaptive biochemical mechanisms, and comparing these biochemical responses under varying irrigation levels has elucidated the stress tolerance mechanisms in Fantasy Seedless.

Keywords

Total proteins Reducing sugars Proline Malondialdehyde Anthocyanin Irrigation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, India, for providing necessary facilities to conduct the present study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Chadha KL, Shikhamany SD (1999) The grapes—improvement, production and postharvest management practices. Malhothra Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gajbhiye KS, Mandal C (2007) Agro-ecological zones, their soil resource and cropping systems. National Bureau of soil survey and land use planning, Nagpur, India. http://www.indiawaterportal.org/sites/indiawaterportal.org/files/01jan00sfm1.pdf
  3. 3.
    Medrano H, Tomas M, Martorell S, Escalona J-M, Pou A, Fuentes S, Flexas J, Bota J (2015) Improving water use efficiency of vineyard. Agron Sustain Dev 105:661–676Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farhad MS, Babak AM, Reza ZM, Hassan RSM, Afshin T (2011) Response of proline, soluble sugars, photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant enzymes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different irrigation regimes in greenhouse condition. Aust J Crop Sci 5:55–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chalker-Scott L (2002) Do anthocyanins function as osmoregulators in leaf tissues? Adv Bot Res 37:103–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wise RR (1995) Chilling-enhanced photo oxidation: the production, action and study of reactive oxygen species produced during chilling in the light. Photosynth Res 45:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang Y, Chen Q, Liu Q, Zhang W, Ding R (2003) Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Plant Physiol 160:1157–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanojia A, Dijkwel PP (2018) Abiotic stress responses are governed by reactive oxygen species and age. Ann Plant Rev  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0611
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Sharma J, Upadhyay AK (2011) A novel technique to apply irrigation water at sub-surface from existing surface drip irrigation system in grapevine: effect on yield, nutrient content and water use efficiency. Indian J Hort 68:312–317Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Metivier RP, Francis FJ, Clydesdale FM (1980) Solvent extraction of anthocyanins from wine pomace. J Food Sci 45:1099–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sadashivam S, Manickam A (1996) Biochemical methods, 2nd edn. New Age international (P) Limited, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    AWRI (2006) Determination of total anthocyanins (colour) in red grape berries. In: AWRI industry standard methods. Cooperative Research Center for Viticulture. www.crcv.com.au
  17. 17.
    Szabados L, Savoure A (2010) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Sci 15:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ashraf M, Foolad M (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jogaiah S, Ramteke SD, Sharma J, Upadhyay AK (2014) Moisture and salinity stress induced changes in biochemical constituents and water relations of different grape rootstock cultivars. Inter J Agron doi:10.1155/2014/789087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Somkuwar RG, Bahetwar A, Khan I, Satisha J, Ramteke SD, Itroutwar P, Oulkar D (2014) Changes in growth, photosynthetic activities, biochemical parameters and amino acid profile of Thompson Seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). J Environ Biol 35:1157–1163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sidhu AS, Bal JS (2009) Effect of irrigation regimes on growth, flowering and biochemical changes in ber plants. J Res Punjab Agric Univ 46:44–49Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parida AK, Dagaonkar VS, Phalak MS, Umalkar GV, Aurangabadkar LP (2007) Alterations in photosynthetic pigments, protein and osmotic components in cotton genotypes subjected to short-term drought stress followed by recovery. Plant Biotechnol Rep 1:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    da Silva Lobato AK, de Oliveira Neto CF, dos Santos Filho BG, Da Costa RCL, Cruz FJR, Neves HKB, dos Santos Lopes MJ (2008) Physiological and biochemical behavior in soybean (Glycine max cv. Sambaiba) plants under water deficit. Aust J Crop Sci 2:25–32Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Etchebarne F, Ojeda H, Hunter JJ, Etchebarne F, Ojeda H, Hunter JJ (2010) Leaf: fruit ratio and vine water status effects on Grenache Noir (Vitis vinifera L.) berry composition: water, sugar, organic acids and cations. S Afr J Enol Vitic 31:106–115Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bacelar EA, Santos DL, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Gonçalves BC, Ferreira HF, Correia CM (2006) Immediate responses and adaptative strategies of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes: changes on structure and chemical composition of foliage and oxidative damage. Plant Sci 170:596–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Petrie PR, Trought MCT, Howell GS (2000) Influence of leaf ageing, leaf area and crop load on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and senescence of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir) leaves. Vitis 39(1):31–36Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jung S (2004) Variation in antioxidant metabolism of young and mature leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to drought. Plant Sci 166:459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herrera JC, Hochberg U, Degu A, Sabbatini P, Lazarovitch N, Castellarin SD, Fait A, Alberti G, Peterlunger E (2017) Grape metabolic response to postveraison water deficit is affected by interseason weather variability. J Agric Food Chem  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01466. Epub 2017 Jul 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-National Research Centre for GrapesPuneIndia
  2. 2.Division of Biochemistry, Department of ChemistrySavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia
  3. 3.ICAR-Central Potato Research InstituteShimlaIndia

Personalised recommendations