Optimal Conditions for the Treatment of Shrimp Culture Effluent Using Immobilized Marine Microalga Picochlorum maculatum (PSDK01)
- 101 Downloads
A significant environmental concern has been raised over the wastewater produced from aquaculture including shrimp farms. In order to evaluate the potential of microalgae to treat the wastewater from a shrimp aquaculture, response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to identify optimal conditions for various parameters. Picochlorum maculatum immobilized beads were used to remove excessive nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, nitrite and ammonia) from a 90 days old shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultured wastewater. The effects of number of algal cells per bead, density of beads per given volume of wastewater, pH, and retention time were investigated. A significant maximum nutrient removal was obtained at pH 7, 24 h of retention time, 150 beads of density and 111,200 cells/ml of algal cell concentration. The primary experimental results were used to RSM for optimizing the variables statistically for maximum nutrient removal. A ‘minimum run resolution V’ central composite design with four variables (pH and retention time, different bead density and algal cell concentrations in beads) was applied to optimize the process. The results showed good fits with the proposed statistical model for the removal of nutrients.
KeywordsWastewater treatment Shrimp culture Beads Immobilization Picochlorum maculatum Response surface methodology
The authors are thankful to the Head, Department of Marine Science and authorities of Bharathidasan University for the facilities provided. They (SDK, PS) are indebted to Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for microalgae culture facility provided through extramural project (BT/PR 5856/AAQ/3/598/2012). One of the authors (SDK) thanks the DBT, Govt. of India for Junior Research Fellowship.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among the authors for publishing this manuscript.
- 1.Wang X, Wang S, Ma Y (2005) Anoxic biological phosphorus removal and effect of excessive aeration on biological phosphorus removal in A2O process. J Chem Indus Eng (China) 56:1565–1570Google Scholar
- 3.Abdel Hameed MS, Hammouda O (2007) Review: biotechnological potential uses of immobilized algae. Int J Agric Biol 9:183–192Google Scholar
- 5.Dinesh Kumar S, Santhanam P, Nandakumar R; Ananth S, Nithya P, Dhanalakshmi B, Mi-Kyung Kim (2016) Bioremediation of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultured effluent using copepod (Oithona rigida) and microalgae (Picochlorum maculatam and Amphora sp.)—An integrated approach, Desal Wat Treat doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1163509
- 9.Abdel Hameed MS (2002) Effect of immobilization on growth and photosynthesis of the green alga Chlorella vulgaris and its efficiency in heavy metals removal. Bull Fac Sci Assiut Uni 31:233–240Google Scholar
- 16.Abdel Hameed MS (2007) Effect of algal density in bead, bead size and bead concentrations on wastewater nutrient removal. Afr J Biotechnol 6:1185–1191Google Scholar
- 20.Strickland SC, Parsons TR (1972) A practical handbook of seawater analyses. Bulletin of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- 21.APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 26.Soumya GN, Manickavasagam M, Santhanam P, Dinesh Kumar S, Vasanthi D, Karuppasamy PK (2015) Optimization of pH, retention time, biomass dosage in beads and beads density on textile dye effluent bioremediation using seagrass, Cymodocea rotundata beads. J Bioremed Biodeg 6:2. doi: 10.4172/2155-6199.1000295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Robinson PK, Mak AL, Trevan MD (1986) Immobilized algae: a review. Proc Bioch 21:122–127Google Scholar
- 31.Dinesh Kumar S, Biodiversity of phytoplankton in Muthukuda mangrove environment, Southeast coast of India and its utilization for aquaculture wastewater remediation and valuable co-product. Ph. D. Thesis, Bharathidasan UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 32.Lukavsky J, Komarek J, Lukavska A, Ludvik J, Pokorny J (1986) Metabolic activity and cell structure of immobilized algal cells (Chlorella, Scenedesmus). Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 73:261–279Google Scholar