Investigating Disease Controlling Ability of Brassica Volatiles and Their Compatibility with Trichoderma harzianum
The present investigation aimed to test the in vitro toxicity of Brassica volatiles against soil-borne plant pathogens (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris (Padwick) Matuo & K. Sato and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary) and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai. Moreover, the response of T. harzianum to toxic volatiles was also studied in terms of glucanase and chitinase gene expression. A strong fungistatic effect of B. alba treatment was recorded against all the test pathogens. Noticeably, S. sclerotiorum manifested least sensitivity among all the tested pathogens. All T. harzianum isolates were less sensitive as compared to the assayed pathogens. Based on the in vitro study involving 6 T. harzianum isolates, T55 and Th-R showed least, while T39 showed highest sensitivity to the volatiles. Interestingly, the patterns relating to the effect of volatiles on inoculum density of T. harzianum isolates were similar to their effect on fungus growth in vitro. More importantly, expression of chitinase and glucanase genes in different Trichoderma isolates was up-regulated, which could improve the biocontrol activity of T. harzianum. Therefore, here the authors envisage that combining biocontrol and biofumigation has the potential to provide sustainable and cost-effective strategies to manage soil-borne plant pathogens.
KeywordsBiofumigation Biocontrol Brassica Isothiocyanate Trichoderma Rhizoctonia
The present study was undertaken as a part of the project entitled “Promoting IPM through a Common Minimum Programme in vegetable cultivation in Uttarakhand hills”, funded by Government of Uttarakhand (Letter No. 1757/Lekha-1/Ra-Kri. Yo./2008-09 dt. 10.07.2008). The authors are thankful to Government of Uttarakhand; Dean, College of Agriculture and Director Experiment Station, G.B.P.U.A.T., Pantnagar for their valuable assistance during this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding this manuscripts.
- 1.Methyl Bromide: Quarantine and Preshipment Uses. http://ozone.unep.org/Publications/UNEP-Ozone-Secretariat-MP-Brochure.pdf
- 2.Redovnikovic IR, Glivetic T, Delonga K, Vorkapic-furac J (2008) Glucosinolates and their potential role in plant. Periodicum Biologorum 11(4):297–309Google Scholar
- 6.Sarwar M, Kirkegaard JA,Wong PT Desmarchelier JM (1998) Biofumigation potential of brassicas. iii in vitro toxicity of isothiocyanates to soil borne fungal pathogens 201(1):103-112. doi: 10.1023/A:1004381129991
- 7.Griffiths HM, Gies D, Zitter TA (2011) Brassicas as Biofumigants for Controlling Soilborne Organisms in Potato Production for Upstate New York and Northern Pennsylvania http://vegetablemdonline.ppath.cornell.edu/NewsArticles/Brassicas%20Factsheet%20Final%20August%202011.pdf
- 11.Galletti S, Sala E, Leoni 0, Burzi PL, Cerato C (2008) Trichoderma spp. tolerance to Brassica carinata seed meal for a combined use in biofumigation. Biological Control 45(3):19-327. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.014
- 15.Krassilnikov NA (1950) Actinomycetes-antagonists and antibiotic substances. S.R., Mascow, Leningrad, Academy of Sciences, U.S (in Russian) Google Scholar
- 17.Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty U, Saha A, Dey P, Sunar K (2010) Molecular Characterization of Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma harzianum Isolated from Soils of North Bengal Based on rDNA Markers and Analysis of Their PCR-RAPD Profiles. Global J Biotechnol Biochem 5(1):55–61Google Scholar
- 18.Prasad P, Kumar J (2012) An RNA isolation protocol for recovery of high quality functional RNA from fungi and plants. Curr Sci 102(9):1257–1260Google Scholar
- 19.Clarkson J, Michel V, Neilson R (2015) Mini-paper - Biofumigation for the control of soil-borne diseases. http://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/9_eip_sbd_mp_biofumigation_final_0.pdf
- 26.Ting ASY, Chai JY (2015) Chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities of Trichoderma harzianum in response towards pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates: early indications of compatibility in consortium. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 4(1):110–113. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2014.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar