Numerical Simulation of Second-Order Microfluidic Filter

  • Wenting Wu
  • Zhongcheng LiangEmail author
  • Le Zhang
  • Rui Zhao
  • Meimei Kong
Research Article


In this paper, we present a microfluidic filter to improve mixing index and eliminate the pulsatile component within microfluidic devices, which is similar to a second-order RC low-pass filter in electronics. COMSOL Multiphysics, a kind of simulation software, is used to evaluate the analytical method and the efficiency of the device. Compared with the results obtained from the equivalent circuit theory, the simulation method has been verified. In addition, the equivalent circuit theory, in other words the fluid dynamical equivalent of Ohm’s law, is adopted to make the theoretical analysis. This microfluidic filter is equipped with multiple simple channels and microcavities having elastic membrane at the top layer, just like the series–parallel connection of resistors and capacitors. Based on the results, one microcavity is equivalent to first-order filter and two microcavities in series equal second-order filter which shows the better filtering effect. Actually, when the driving frequency exceeds 60 Hz, this device can export almost steady fluid. The mixing effect is improved compared with the simple microfluidic junctions. The combined application of microfluidics and equivalent circuit theory will gain insightful ideas and practical design methods for developing unique microfluidic devices to address a broad range of biological and chemical challenges.


Microfluidic filter Second-order RC low-pass filter The equivalent circuit theory Microchannel Microcavity 



This work was supported by the Research Center of Optical Communications Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. ZSF0402), and the Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province Plans for Graduate Research and Innovation, China (Grant No. CXZZ13_0465).


  1. 1.
    McDonald JC, Duffy DC, Anderson JR, Chiu DT, Wu H, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly (dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thorsen T, Maerkl SJ, Quake SR (2002) Microfluidic large-scale integration. Science 298:580ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manz A, Graber N, Widmer HM (1990) Miniaturized total chemical analysis: a novel concept for chemical sensing. Sens Actuators B Chem 1:244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin BC, Long ZC, Liu X, Qin JH (2006) Recent advances of microfluidics in Mainland China. Biotechnol J 1:1225–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitesides GM (2011) What comes next? Lab Chip 11:191–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin K, Holbert KE (2009) Applying the equivalent Pi circuit to the modeling of hydraulic pressurized lines. Math Comput Simul 79:2064–2075MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oh KW, Lee K, Ahn B, Furlani EP (2012) Design of pressure-driven microfluidic networks using electric circuit analogy. Lab Chip 12:515–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu Y, Le N (2009) Equivalent electrical network for performance characterization of piezoelectric peristaltic micropump. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bahrami M, Yovanovich MM, Culham JR (2006) Pressure drop of fully-developed, laminar flow in microchannels of arbitrary cross-section. J Fluids Eng 128:1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourouina T, Grandchamp JP (1996) Modeling micropumps with electrical equivalent networks. J Micromech Microeng 6:398–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerlach T (1998) Microdiffusers as dynamic passive valves for micropump applications. Sens Actuators A 69:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bourouina T, Bosseboeufand A, Grandchamp JP (1997) Design and simulation of an electrostatic micropump for drug-delivery applications. J Micromech Microeng 7:186–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soleymani A, Kolehmainen E, Turunen I (2008) Numerical and experimental investigations of liquid mixing in T-type micromixers. Chem Eng J 135:S219–S228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alam A, Kim KY (2012) Analysis of mixing in a curved microchannel with rectangular grooves. Chem Eng J 181–182:708–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarkar S, Singh KK, Shankar V, Shenoy KT (2014) Numerical simulation of mixing at 1–1 and 1–2 microfluidic junctions. Chem Eng Process 85:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alexander CK, Sadiku MNO (2000) Fundamentals of electric circuits. Tsinghua University Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Photoelectric EngineeringNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Center of Optofluidic TechnologyNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations