Advertisement

National Academy Science Letters

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 195–198 | Cite as

Determinants of Inequality in Dairy Development of India

  • R. B. KaleEmail author
  • K. Ponnusamy
  • R. Sendhil
  • Sanjit Maiti
  • B. S. Chandel
  • S. K. Jha
  • T. K. Mohanty
  • S. P. Lal
Short Communication

Abstract

Dairy sector plays an integral role in nutritional security as well as economic prosperity. The present study was designed with an attempt to identify the determinants of the inequality in Indian dairy development. Coefficient of variation, Gini coefficient, principal component analysis and Duncan’s multiple range test were used to quantify inequalities and its determinants among the highly, moderately and least dairy progressive states by using 20 dairy development indicators. It was found that Gini coefficients for the three strata indicated the level of inequality in dairy development but in varying magnitude. The study also depicts that the average per day milk yield of crossbred cattle, indigenous cattle and buffaloes; number of AI done; milk procurement through cooperatives; capacity of milk processing and surface road length found to be significantly different among the three regions. The study advocates for proper planning and prioritization of indicators that determine the regional development to reduce the variability and regional imbalances for additional milk production.

Keywords

Dairy development Inequality Duncan’s multiple range test Gini coefficient 

References

  1. 1.
    TCD Report (2016) Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying & Fisheries (DADF) Ministry of finance, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shah J, Dave D (2010) A shift from crop-mixed traditional dairying to market-oriented organised dairy farming—plausible factors responsible for structural transformation in Indian dairy sector. Indian J Agric Econ 65(2):298–307Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dastagiri MB (2004) Demand and supply projections for livestock products in India. Policy Paper, 21, NCAP, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raut KC, Bhatia VK, Khatri RS (2002) Disparities in livestock development in India. J Ind Soc Agric Stat 55(1):108–115MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jha B (2004) India’s dairy sector in the emerging trade order. Institute of Economic Growth. New Delhi. http://iegindia.org/workpap/wp243.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2016
  6. 6.
    Saikia TN, Kakaty G (2007) Evaluation of IDDP Project in Operation Flood, Hilly and Backward Areas of North-Eastern Region, Report submitted by Agro-Economic Research Centre for North-East India, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, AssamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta SK, Purohit A (2010) Growth of productivity in dairy industry: an inter-state analysis. Int J Educ Adm 2(4):685–689Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar A, Parappurathua S, Joshi PK (2013) Structural transformation in dairy sector of India. Agric Econ Res Rev 26(2):209–218Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dadhich CL (2015) Role of dairying in diversification of indian agriculture. Book chapter in Diversification of Agriculture in Eastern India, Springer, India, pp 99–107Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kale RB, Ponnusamy K, Chakravarty AK, Sendhil R, Mohammad A (2016) Assessing resource and infrastructure disparities to strengthen indian dairy sector. Indian J Animal Sci 86(6):109–114Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nasurudeen P, Kuruvila A, Sendhil R, Chandrasekar V (2006) The dynamics and inequality of nutrient consumption in India. Indian J Agric Econ 61(3):362–370Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ayyoob KC, Krishnadas M, Kallil FMH (2013) Intra regional disparities in agricultural development in Kerala. Agric Update 8(1&2):103–106Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feroze SM, Chauhan AK (2010) Performance of dairy self help groups (SHGs) in India: principal component analysis (PCA) approach. Indian J Agric Econ 65(2):308–320Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maiti S, Jha SK, Garai S, Nag A, Chakravarty R, Kadian KS, Chandel BS, Datta KK, Upadhyay RC (2015) Assessment of social vulnerability to climate change in the eastern coast of India. Clim Change 131(2):287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rana V, Sewa R, Sendhil R, Nehra K, Sharma I (2015) Physiological, biochemical and morphological study in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) RILs population for salinity tolerance. J Agric Sci 7(10):119–128Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11(1):1–42MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao PP, Hall AJ (2003) Importance of crop residues in crop–livestock systems in India and farmers’ perceptions of fodder quality in coarse cereals. Field Crops Res 84(1):189–198Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sreenivas D (2013) Breeding policy strategies for genetic improvement of cattle and buffaloes in India. Vet World 6(7):455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. B. Kale
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Ponnusamy
    • 2
  • R. Sendhil
    • 3
  • Sanjit Maiti
    • 2
  • B. S. Chandel
    • 2
  • S. K. Jha
    • 2
  • T. K. Mohanty
    • 2
  • S. P. Lal
    • 2
  1. 1.ICAR- Directorate of Onion and Garlic ResearchPuneIndia
  2. 2.ICAR- National Dairy Research InstituteKarnalIndia
  3. 3.ICAR- Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley ResearchKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations