Advertisement

Potential of low molecular weight natural polysaccharides for colon targeted formulation and its evaluation in human by Gamma Scintigraphy

  • S. P. SawarkarEmail author
  • S. G. Deshpande
  • A. N. Bajaj
  • P. S. Soni
  • P. Pandit
  • V. S. Nikam
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Colonic drug targeting is an elusive goal, implicated for localized drug and systemic delivery of proteins which otherwise cannot be delivered by oral route. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the suitability of formulation design of compression coating and potential of low molecular weight natural polysaccharides for colonic drug targeting using Gamma Scintigraphy in human subjects and to establish platform technology.

Methods

Before commencing with in vivo imaging studies in human by Gamma Scintigraphy, we performed in vitro release studies and scanning electron microscopy for surface topography of tablet formulations subjected to in vitro dissolution study.

Results

We investigated the applicability of low molecular weight and low viscosity grade Guar gum ULV 1000 and Pectin with low degree of methoxylation 9% as for site specific delivery. Gamma Scintigraphy imaging of formulation with biopolymer in human subject showed the transit of tablet intact in colon with average arrival time being 5.75 h and the activity was released continuously for 30 h. Scanning electron microscopy for surface topography of tablets subjected to simulated colonic fluid showed erosion caused by microbial flora of the colon.

Conclusion

Taken together, compression coating design with low molecular weight biopolymer can serve as a platform technology to deliver other potential molecules to the colonic region for local and/or systemic effects in other therapeutic areas.

Keywords

Gamma Scintigraphy Scanning electron microscopy Guargum ULV 1000 Pectin Tc DTPA 99m Colon targeted drug delivery polymers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge The Board of Radiation and Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India forfunding this project (BARC GRANT 98/35/5/932).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

 All healthy human participated in imaging studies were voluntarily involved with their written consent as per the local institutional ethical guidelines. The purpose of the study was explained to them and the experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Radiation Medicine Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai.

Supplementary material

40005_2019_447_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Antonin KH, Rak R, Bieck PR, Preiss R, Schenker U, Hastewell J, Fox R, Mackay M (1996) The absorption of human calcitonin from the transverse colon of man. Int J Pharm 130:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashford M, Fell T (1994) Targeting drugs to the colon: delivery system for oral administration. J Drug Target 2:241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banker GS, Rhodes CT (2002) Sustained and controlled release drug delivery system, 4th edn. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Basit A, Bloor J (2003) Perspectives on colonic drug delivery, business briefing. Pharm Technol 2003:185–190Google Scholar
  5. Bondesen S (1997) Intestinal fate of 5-aminosalicylic acid: regional and systemic kinetic studies in relation to inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacol Toxicol 81(2):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chien YW (1992) Novel drug delivery, systems, revised and expanded, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Chourasia MK, Jain SK (2003) Pharmaceutical approaches to colon targeted drug delivery systems. J Pharm Sci 6:33–66Google Scholar
  8. Dorkoosh FA, Stokkel MP, Blok D, Borchard G, Rafiee-Tehrani M, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE (2004) Feasibility study on the retention of superporous hydrogel composite polymer in the intestinal tract of man using scintigraphy. J Control Release 99:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan MZ, Lackeyram TAD, Liu Q, Mine Y, Paliyath G (2012) Consumption of guar gum and retrograded high-amylose corn resistant starch increases IL-10 abundance without affecting pro-inflammatory cytokines in the colon of pigs fed a high-fat diet. J Anim Sci 90:278–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goto T, Tanida N, Yoshinaga T, Sato S, Ball DJ, Wilding IR, Kobayashi E, Fujimura A (2004) Pharmaceutical design of a novel colon-targeted delivery system using two-layer-coated tablets of three different pharmaceutical formulations, supported by clinical evidence in humans. J Control Release 97:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hua S, Marks E, Schneider JJ, Keely S (2015) Advances in oral nano delivery systems for colon targeted drug delivery in inflammatory bowel disease: selective targeting to diseased versus healthy tissue. Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med 11:1117–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishibashi T, Pitcair GR, Yoshino H, Mizobe M, Wilding IR (1998) Scintigraphic evaluation of a new capsule-type colon specific drug delivery system in healthy volunteers. J Pharm Sci 87:531–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kedzierewicz F, Thouvenot P, Lemut J, Etienne A, Hoffman M, Maincent P (1999) Evaluation of peroral silicone dosage forms in humans by gamma Scintigraphy. J Control Release 58:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krishnaiaha YSR, Satyanarayanaa S, Rama Prasada YV, Narasimha Raob S (1998a) Evaluation of guar gum as a compression coat for drug targeting to colon. Int J Pharm 171:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krishnaiaha YSR, Satyanarayanaa S, Rama Prasada YV, Narasimha Raob S (1998b) Gamma scintigraphic studies on guar gum matrix tablets for colonic drug delivery in healthy human volunteers. J Control Release 55:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lautenschläger C, Schmid C, Fische D, Stallmac A (2014) Drug delivery strategies in the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 71:58–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee VH, Robinson JR (1998) Sustained and controlled release drug delivery system. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Macfarlane GT, Hay S, Macfarlane S, Gibson GR (1990) Effect of different carbohydrates on growth, polysaccharidase and glucosidase production by Bacteroides ovatus in batch and continous culture. J Appl Bacteriol 68:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mackay M, Tomlinson E (1993) Colonic delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins. In: Biek PR (ed) Colonic drug absorption and metabolism. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Markov PA, Popov SV, Nikitina IR, Ovodova RG, Ovodova YS (2011) Anti-inflammatory activity of pectins and their galacturonan backbone. Russ J Bioorg Chem 37:817–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McConnell EL, Fadda HM, Basit AW (2008) Gut instincts: explorations in intestinal physiology and drug delivery. Int J Pharm 364(2):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLeod AD, Friend DR, Tozer TN (1994) Glucocorticoid-dextran conjugates as potential prodrugs for colon-specific delivery: hydrolysis in rat gastrointestinal tract contents. J Pharm Sci 83:1284–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Philip AK, Dabas S, Pathak K (2009) Optimized prodrug approach: a means for achieving enhanced anti-inflammatory potential in experimentally induced colitis. J Drug Target 17:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Podolsky DK (2002) Iinflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 347:417–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Popov SV, Popova GY, Ovodova RG, Ovodov YS (2005) Antiinflammatory activity of the pectic polysaccharide from Comarum palustre. Fitoterapia 76:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Popov SV, Popova GY, Ovodova RG, Ovodov YS (2013) Anti-inflammatory activity of low and high methoxylated citrus pectins. Biomed Prev Nutr 3:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME (2009) Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, 6th edn. Pharmaceutical Press, American Pharmacists Association, Washington, D.C., p 298Google Scholar
  28. Sato Y, Kawashima Y, Takeuchi H, Yamamoto H, Fujibayashi Y (2004) Pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of riboflavin-containing microballoons for a floating controlled drug delivery system in healthy humans. J Control Release 98:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sawarkar SP, Deshpande SG, Bajaj AN, Nikam VS (2015) In vivo evaluation of 5-ASA colon-specific tablets using experimental-induced 4 colitis rat animal model. AAPS PharmSciTech 16:1445–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shah N, Shah T, Amin A (2011) Polysaccharides: a targeting strategy for colonic drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 8:779–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinha VR, Kumria R (2001) Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm 224:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strebhardt K, Uhrlich A (2008) Paul Ehrlich’s magic bullet concept: 100 years of progress. Nat Rev Cancer 8:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takahashi T, Yokawa T, Ishihara N, Okubo T, Chu DC, Nishigaki E, Kawada Y, Kato M, Raj Juneja L (2009) Hydrolysed guar gum decreases postprandial blood glucoseand glucose absorption in the rat small intestine. Nutr Res 29:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tomlin J, Read NW, Edwards CA, Duerden BI (1986) The degradation of guar gum by a faecal incubation system. Br J Nutr 55:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watts P, Illum L (1997) Colonic drug delivery. Drug Drug Dev Ind Pharm 23:893–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei GXH, Ding PT, Li SM, Zheng JM (2002) Thermosetting gels with modulated gelation temperature for ophthalmic use: the rheological and gamma scintigraphic studies. J Control Release 83:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilding IR, Coupe AJ, Davis SS (1991) The role of gamma scintigraphy in oral drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 7:87–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. P. Sawarkar
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. G. Deshpande
    • 2
  • A. N. Bajaj
    • 1
  • P. S. Soni
    • 3
  • P. Pandit
    • 4
  • V. S. Nikam
    • 5
  1. 1.SVKM’s Dr. Bhanuben Nanavati College of PharmacyMumbai UniversityMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.C. U. Shah College of PharmacyS.N.D.T Women’s UniversityMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Radiation Medicine Centre [RMC], Tata Memorial HospitalMumbaiIndia
  4. 4.Formulation Development, R&D Cipla Ltd.MumbaiIndia
  5. 5.STES’s Smt. K. N. College of PharmacyS. P. Pune UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations