Advertisement

Infection

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 307–311 | Cite as

‘Lost in Nasal Space’: Staphylococcus aureus sepsis associated with Nasal Handkerchief Packing

  • Philipp Koehler
  • Norma Jung
  • Matthias Kochanek
  • Philipp Lohneis
  • Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen
  • Boris BöllEmail author
Case Report

Abstract

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus frequently causes infections in outpatient and hospital settings and can present as a highly variable entity. Typical manifestations are endocarditis, osteoarticular infections or infection of implanted prostheses, intravascular devices or foreign bodies. A thorough diagnostic evaluation with early focus identification is mandatory to improve patient outcome.

Case report

We report a case of a 68-year old patient with a history of double allogeneic stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia who developed a S. aureus bacteremia with dissemination, severe sepsis and lethal outcome due to nasal handkerchief packing after nose bleeding.

Conclusion

A thorough medical examination with further diagnostic work-up is most important in S. aureus blood stream infection to identify and eradicate the portal(s) of entry, to rule out endocarditis, to search for spinal abscesses, osteomyelitis or spondylodiscitis. Adherence to management guides for clinicians must be of major importance to achieve optimal quality of clinical care, and thus improve patient outcome.

Keywords

Dissemination Superantigen Intensive care medicine Infectious disease consulting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For this publication written approval was obtained from the patient’s wife and attorney regarding his case report to appear in publications in any media worldwide. We thank the patient and his family for providing private photographs during the development of the disease at the outpatient setting and for allowing us to publish the case for educational purposes. Facial photo deidentification was performed by the treating physician according to Roberts’ and colleagues’ Standardization of Guidelines for Patient Photograph Deidentification to ensure the patient’s anonymity [21]. Laboratory results in full text were converted by use of the SI Conversion Calculator by the American Medical Association http://www.amamanualofstyle.com/page/si-conversion-calculator. Accessed April 5th, 2018.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

PK reports non-financial support from Merck/MSD, non-financial support from MedImmune, and lecture honoraria from Astellas outside the submitted work. NJ received lecture fees from Labor Stein, Novartis, Gilead, MSD, Infectopharm and travel grants from Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Basilea, Gilead. MK declares no potential conflict of interest in regard to this work. PL declares no potential conflict of interest in regard to this work. ASV declares no potential conflict of interest in regard to this work. BB declares no potential conflict of interest in regard to this work.

Supplementary material

15010_2018_1221_MOESM1_ESM.docx (329 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 328 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(8):520–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams RE. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol Rev. 1963;27:56–71.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cole AM, Tahk S, Oren A, Yoshioka D, Kim YH, Park A, et al. Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:1064–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eriksen NH, Espersen F, Rosdahl VT, Jensen K. Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among 104 healthy persons during a 19-month period. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;115:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, French P, Hu J, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP, et al. Preoperative risk factors for nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:481–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armstrong-Esther CA. Carriage patterns of Staphylococcus aureus in a healthy non-hospital population of adults and children. Ann Hum Biol. 1976;3:221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peacock SJ, Justice A, Griffiths D, de Silva GD, Kantzanou MN, Crook D, et al. Determinants of acquisition and carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in infancy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5718–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nouwen J, Boelens H, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Human factor in Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. Infect Immun. 2004;72(11):6685–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wertheim HF, van Kleef M, Vos MC, Ott A, Verbrugh HA, Fokkens W. Nose picking and nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:863–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jung N, Rieg S. Essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection. Infection. 2018;46(4):441–2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1130-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mylotte JM, McDermott C, Spooner JA. Prospective study of 114 consecutive episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shurland S, Zhan M, Bradham DD, Roghmann MC. Comparison of mortality risk associated with bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:273–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaasch AJ, Barlow G, Edgeworth JD, Fowler VG Jr, Hellmich M, Hopkins S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a pooled analysis of five prospective, observational studies. J Infect. 2014;68:242–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehmann C, Berner R, Bogner JR, Cornely OA, de With K, Herold S, et al. The “Choosing Wisely” initiative in infectious diseases. Infection. 2017;45:263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fowler VG Jr, Olsen MK, Corey GR, Woods CW, Cabell CH, Reller LB, et al. Clinical identifiers of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2066–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bai AD, Showler A, Burry L, Steinberg M, Ricciuto DR, Fernandes T, et al. Comparative effectiveness of cefazolin versus cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for MSSA bacteraemia: results from a large multicentre cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:1539–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee S, Choe PG, Song KH, Park SW, Kim HB, Kim NJ, et al. Is cefazolin inferior to nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5122–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li J, Echevarria KL, Hughes DW, Cadena JA, Bowling JE, Lewis JS. 2nd. Comparison of cefazolin versus oxacillin for treatment of complicated bacteremia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:5117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forsblom E, Ruotsalainen E, Ollgren J, Jarvinen A. Telephone consultation cannot replace bedside infectious disease consultation in the management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:527–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yahav D, Shaked H, Goldberg E, Yassin S, Eliakim-Raz N, Paul M, et al. Time trends in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, 1988–2010, in a tertiary center with high methicillin resistance rates. Infection. 2017;45:51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roberts EA, Troiano C, Spiegel JH. Standardization of guidelines for patient photograph deidentification. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:611–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department I of Internal Medicine, Intensive Care UnitUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD)CologneGermany
  3. 3.Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations