Advertisement

Sorption of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides on chitosan-modified biochars

  • S. Yavari
  • M. AbualqumbozEmail author
  • N. Sapari
  • H.-A. Hata-Suhaimi
  • N.-Z. Nik-Fuaad
  • S. Yavari
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aimed to synthesize chitosan-modified biochars with the objective of producing an efficient biosorbents for immobilization of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides in soil. Two biochars were produced separately from oil palm empty fruit bunches and rice husk biomasses and then modified with chitosan in a nitrogen gas environment. The biosorbents characterization showed that biochars modification with chitosan decreased their total surface areas. However, their cation exchange capacities significantly increased. The outcomes also showed that soil amendment with chitosan-modified biochars remarkably enhanced its capacity for sorption of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides as compared with pure soil and soil amended with unmodified biochars. Based on the linear distribution coefficients, the capacity of soil for imazapic sorption enhanced by 50% after mixing with unmodified empty fruit bunches biochar, and by 73% after amendment with the chitosan-modified empty fruit bunches biochar. For imazapyr herbicide, soil sorption capacity improved by 8% owing to amendment with unmodified empty fruit bunches biochar, and by approximately 84% after mixing with chitosan-modified empty fruit bunches biochar. Likewise, amendment of soil with unmodified and chitosan-modified rice husk biochars increased its sorption capacity for imazapic herbicide by 25% and 36%, respectively, and for imazapyr herbicide by 36% and 67%, respectively. Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms showed similar trends. In conclusion, biochar modification with chitosan would remarkably improve their sorption capacity for imidazolinone herbicides including imazapic and imazapyr herbicides.

Keywords

Biosorbent Immobilization Oil palm empty fruit bunches Pyrolysis Rice husk Soil amendment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by ministry of higher education (MOHE) of Malaysia under fundamental research Grant scheme (FRGS) (Grant No. 0153AB-L33) and by Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) under Yayasan UTP (YUTP) (Grant No. 015LC0-027). The authors thank Dr. Wesam S. Alaloul (Universiti Teknologi Petronas) for his assistance in providing valuable information. The authors also owe many thanks to the late Dr. Amirhossein Malakahmad for his contribution to this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afzal MZ, Sun X-F, Liu J, Song C, Wang S-G, Javed A (2018) Enhancement of ciprofloxacin sorption on chitosan/biochar hydrogel beads. Sci Total Environ 639:560–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. binti Ab Aziz NS, bin Mohd Nor MA, binti Abdul Manaf SF, Hamzah F (2015) Suitability of biochar produced from biomass waste as soil amendment. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 195:2457–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bono-Blay F, Guart A, de la Fuente B, Pedemonte M, Pastor MC, Borrell A, Lacorte S (2012) survey of phthalates, alkylphenols, bisphenol A and herbicides in spanish source waters intended for bottling. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(8):3339–3349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callegari A, Capodaglio A (2018) Properties and beneficial uses of (bio) chars, with special attention to products from sewage sludge pyrolysis. Resources 7(1):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chua P-H, Neoh K-G, Kang E-T, Wang W (2008) Surface functionalization of titanium with hyaluronic acid/chitosan polyelectrolyte multilayers and RGD for promoting osteoblast functions and inhibiting bacterial adhesion. Biomaterials 29(10):1412–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobb AH, Reade JPH (2011) Herbicides and plant physiology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui X, Dai X, Khan KY, Li T, Yang X, He Z (2016) Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution using magnesium-alginate/chitosan modified biochar microspheres derived from Thalia dealbata. Biores Technol 218:1123–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dechene A, Rosendahl I, Laabs V, Amelung W (2014) Sorption of Polar herbicides and herbicide metabolites by biochar-amended soil. Chemosphere 109:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng J, Liu Y, Liu S, Zeng G, Tan X, Huang B, Tang X, Wang S, Hua Q, Yan Z (2017) Competitive adsorption of Pb(II), Cd (II) and Cu (II) onto chitosan-pyromellitic dianhydride modified biochar. J Colloid Interface Sci 506:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Du J, Song K, Wang Z (2015) Estimation of water consumption and productivity for rice through integrating remote sensing and census data in the Songnen Plain, China. Paddy Water Environ 13(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fait G, Balderacchi M, Ferrari F, Ungaro F, Capri E, Trevisan M (2010) A field study of the impact of different irrigation practices on herbicide leaching. Eur J Agron 32(4):280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felding G (1995) Leaching of phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides from farmland. Sci Total Environ 168(1):11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerente C, Lee VKC, Le Cloirec P, McKay G (2007) Application of chitosan for the removal of metals from wastewaters by adsorption—mechanisms and models review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 37(1):41–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goolsby DA, Michael Thurman E, Pomes ML, Meyer MT, Battaglin WA (1997) Herbicides and their metabolites in rainfall: origin, transport, and deposition patterns across the midwestern and northeastern United States, 1990–1991. Environ Sci Technol 31(5):1325–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guzzella L, Pozzoni F, Giuliano G (2006) Herbicide contamination of surficial groundwater in Northern Italy. Environ Pollut 142(2):344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton V, Yuan Y, Rigney DA, Chesnutt BM, Puckett AD, Ong JL, Yang Y, Haggard WO, Elder SH, Bumgardner JD (2007) Bone cell attachment and growth on well-characterized chitosan films. Polym Int 56(5):641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu H, Yang L, Lin Z, Zhao Y, Jiang X, Hou L (2018) A low-cost and environment friendly chitosan/aluminum hydroxide bead adsorbent for fluoride removal from aqueous solutions. Iran Polym J 27(4):253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang X, Liu Y, Liu S, Tan X, Ding Y, Zeng G, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Wang S, Zheng B (2016) Effective removal of Cr(VI) using β-cyclodextrin–chitosan modified biochars with adsorption/reduction bifuctional roles. RSC Adv 6(1):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang Y, Lee X, Grattieri M, Yuan M, Cai R, Macazo FC, Minteer SD (2020) Modified biochar for phosphate adsorption in environmentally relevant conditions. Chem Eng J 380:122375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayasantha Kumari H, Krishnamoorthy P, Arumugam TK, Radhakrishnan S, Vasudevan D (2017) An efficient removal of crystal violet dye from waste water by adsorption onto TLAC/chitosan composite: a novel low cost adsorbent. Int J Biol Macromol 96:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson AC, Besien TJ, Bhardwaj C La, Dixon A, Gooddy DC, Haria AH, White C (2001) Penetration of herbicides to groundwater in an unconfined chalk aquifer following normal soil applications. J Contam Hydrol 53(1):101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones JB Jr (2001) Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jou C-H, Yuan L, Lin S-M, Hwang M-C, Chou W-L, Da-Guang Yu, Yang M-C (2007) Biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of chitosan and hyaluronic acid immobilized polyester fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 104(1):220–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jóźwiak T, Filipkowska U, Brym S, Kopeć L (2019) Use of aminated hulls of sunflower seeds for the removal of anionic dyes from aqueous solutions. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02536-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kasozi GN, Zimmerman AR, Nkedi-Kizza P, Gao B (2010) Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol 44(16):6189–6195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Köck-Schulmeyer M, Ginebreda A, Postigo C, Garrido T, Fraile J, López de Alda M, Barceló D (2014) Four-year advanced monitoring program of polar pesticides in groundwater of catalonia (NE-Spain). Sci Total Environ 470–471:1087–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar MNVR (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Funct Polym 46(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar MNV, Ravi RM, Muzzarelli C, Sashiwa H, Domb AJ (2004) Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev 104(12):6017–6084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  30. Li R, Wen B, Zhang S, Pei Z, Shan X (2009) Influence of organic amendments on the sorption of pentachlorophenol on soils. J Environ Sci 21(4):474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu S, Huang B, Chai L, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Zeng W, Shang M, Deng J, Zhou Z (2017) Enhancement of As (V) Adsorption from aqueous solution by a magnetic chitosan/biochar composite. RSC Adv 7(18):10891–10900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin SM, Kookana RS, Van Zwieten L, Krull E (2012) Marked changes in herbicide sorption-desorption upon ageing of biochars in soil. J Hazard Mater 231–232:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Masulili A, Utomo WH, Syechfani MS (2010) Rice husk biochar for rice based cropping system in acid soil 1. The Characteristics of Rice Husk Biochar and Its Influence on the Properties of Acid sulfate soils and rice growth in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. J Agric Sci 2(1):39–47Google Scholar
  34. Olejnik A, Nowak I, Schroeder G (2019) Functionalized polystyrene beads as carriers in release studies of two herbicides: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(10):5623–5634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pusino A, Petretto S, Gessa C (1997) Adsorption and desorption of imazapyr by soil. J Agric Food Chem 45(3):1012–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rinaudo M (2006) Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 31(7):603–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ritter WF, Scarborough RW, Chirnside AEM (1994) Contamination of groundwater by triazines, metolachlor and alachlor. J Contam Hydrol 15(1):73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schofield RK, Wormald Taylor A (1955) The measurement of soil PH1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 19:164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shi Y, Hu H, Ren H (2020) Dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal from biotreated coking wastewater by chitosan-modified biochar: adsorption fractions and mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 297:122281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sopeña F, Semple K, Sohi S, Bending G (2012) Assessing the chemical and biological accessibility of the herbicide isoproturon in soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 88(1):77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stenrød M (2015) Long-term trends of pesticides in norwegian agricultural streams and potential future challenges in northern climate. Acta Agric Scand, Sect B—Soil Plant Sci 65(sup2):199–216Google Scholar
  42. Struger J, Van Stempvoort DR, Brown SJ (2015) Sources of aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in urban and rural catchments in Ontario, Canada: glyphosate or phosphonates in wastewater? Environ Pollut 204:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tatarková V, Hiller E, Vaculík M (2013) Impact of wheat straw biochar addition to soil on the sorption, leaching, dissipation of the herbicide (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid and the growth of sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 92:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomczyk A, Boguta P, Sokołowska Z (2019) Biochar efficiency in copper removal from haplic soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(8):4899–4912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tran VS, Ngo HH, Guo W, Zhang J, Liang S, Ton-That C, Zhang X (2015) Typical low cost biosorbents for adsorptive removal of specific organic pollutants from water. Bioresour Technol 182:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Stempvoort DR, Roy JW, Brown SJ, Bickerton G (2014) Residues of the herbicide glyphosate in riparian groundwater in urban catchments. Chemosphere 95:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vithanage M, Herath I, Joseph S, Bundschuh J, Bolan N, Ok YS, Kirkham MB, Rinklebe J (2017) Interaction of Arsenic with biochar in soil and water: a critical review. Carbon 113:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang T-T, Cheng J, Liu X-J, Jiang W, Zhang C-L, Xiang-Yang Yu (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on the bioavailability of pesticide chlorantraniliprole in soil to earthworm. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 83:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson C, Tisdell C (2001) Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecol Econ 39(3):449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB (2015) Biochar efficiency in pesticides sorption as a function of production variables—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(18):13824–13841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB (2016a) Effects of production conditions on yield and physicochemical properties of biochars produced from rice husk and oil palm empty fruit bunches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(18):17928–17940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB, Yavari S (2016b) Sorption-desorption mechanisms of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides on biochars produced from agricultural wastes. J Environ Chem Eng 4(4, Part A):3981–3989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yavari S, Sapari NB, Malakahmad A, Yavari S (2019) Degradation of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides in the presence of optimized oil palm empty fruit bunch and rice husk biochars in soil. J Hazard Mater 366:636–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yue L, Ge C, Feng D, Huamei Yu, Deng H, Bomin F (2017) Adsorption–desorption behavior of atrazine on agricultural soils in China. J Environ Sci 57:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang J, Xia W, Liu P, Cheng Q, Tahi T, Wenxiu G, Li B (2010) Chitosan modification and pharmaceutical/biomedical applications. Mar Drugs 8(7):1962–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang M-m, Liu Y-g, Li T-t, Wei-hua X, Zheng B-h, Tan X-f, Wang H, Guo Y-m, Guo F-y, Wang S-f (2015) Chitosan modification of magnetic biochar produced from Eichhornia crassipes for enhanced sorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. RSC Adv 5(58):46955–46964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zheng W, Guo M, Chow T, Bennett DN, Rajagopalan N (2010) Sorption properties of greenwaste biochar for two triazine pesticides. J Hazard Mater 181(1):121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou Y, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Fang J, Sun Y, Cao X (2013) Sorption of heavy metals on chitosan-modified biochars and its biological effects. Chem Eng J 231:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu C, Lang Y, Liu B, Zhao H (2019) Ofloxacin adsorption on chitosan/biochar composite: kinetics, isotherms, and effects of solution chemistry. Polycycl Aromat Compd 39(3):287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASBandar Seri IskandarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations