Regression-based models for prediction of oxides of nitrogen in diesel exhaust with electric discharge-based treatment

  • Srikanth Allamsetty
  • Sankarsan MohapatroEmail author
  • N. B. Puhan
Original Paper


A prior prediction of oxides of nitrogen, i.e., NOX (sum of NO and NO2), in diesel exhaust while treating with electric discharge-based nonthermal plasma (NTP) technique, would assist the researchers in planning the resources required for the treatment. In this present study, the performance of different regression-based models, i.e., linear, support vector regression and Gaussian process regression (GPR), has been analyzed for predicting the NOX concentrations based on the values of five dominating parameters of the NTP treatment. Experiments have been conducted and collected a dataset of 4032 number of input–output pairs to be used for training and testing of the regression models. The performances of these models have been assessed while testing them for the unseen set of data. A comparison of root-mean-square error (RMSE) has been made, where Matern 3/2 type of GPR model has been found to be the best among all the considered models with an RMSE of 1.86 ppm for a test data of 1210 sets. The model is shown to perform consistently well even when the test data are increased to 50% of total data. Regression analysis shows that the NOX can be predicted with very good accuracy using the Matern 3/2 type of GPR model.


Air quality Diesel exhaust Nonthermal plasma NOX removal Prediction of NOX Regression analysis Support vector regression Gaussian process regression 



This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Allamsetty S, Mohapatro S (2018a) Prediction of NOX concentration in nonthermal plasma-treated diesel exhaust using dimensional analysis. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 46:2034–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allamsetty S, Mohapatro S (2018) Prediction of NO and NO2 concentrations in NTP treated diesel exhaust using multilayer perceptrons. In: 10th International conference on applied energy, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  3. Allamsetty S, Mohapatro S (2018) Prediction of NOX concentrations in diesel exhaust with NTP treatment using different types of FLANNs. In: International symposium non-thermal/thermal plasma pollution control technology & sustainable energy, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. Azzam M et al (2018) Application of evolutionary neural networks and support vector machines to model NOx emissions from gas turbines. J Environ Chem Eng 6:1044–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya A, Rajanikanth BS (2013) Performance of helical and straight-wire corona electrodes for NOx abatement under AC/Pulse energizations. Int J Plasma Environ Sci Technol 7:148–156Google Scholar
  6. Bin Y, Zhongzhen Y, Baozhen Y (2006) Bus arrival time prediction using support vector machines. J Intell Transp Syst 10:151–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caywood MS et al (2017) Gaussian process regression for predictive but interpretable machine learning models: an example of predicting mental workload across tasks front. Hum Neurosci 10:647. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui C, Fearn T (2017) Comparison of partial least squares regression, least squares support vector machines, and Gaussian process regression for a near infrared calibration. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 25:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (1988) Fundamentals of air pollution engineering. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang C, Wang L (2017) Gaussian process regression-based modelling of lithium-ion battery temperature-dependent open-circuit-voltage. Electron Lett 53:2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jasmin K, Bhattacharyya A, Rajanikanth BS (2015) Prediction of NOX removal efficiency in plasma treated exhaust: a dimensional analysis approach. In: 3rd ISNPEDADM, new electrical technology environmentGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SI et al (2016) A prediction model for functional outcomes in spinal cord disorder patients using gaussian process regression. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inform 20:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Li X, Yuan D, Guo Y (2017) Using least squares support vector machine to predict the maximum ground surface settlement caused by shield tunneling the electron. J Geotech Eng 22:613–626Google Scholar
  14. Liu B et al (2016) A novel optimal support vector machine ensemble model for NOX emissions prediction of a diesel engine. Measurement 92:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohapatro S, Rajanikanth BS (2011) Portable hvac and pulsed plasma sources for control of NOx in diesel engine exhaust. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 18:1821–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohapatro S et al (2017) Study of nano second pulse discharge based nitrogen oxides treatment using different electrode configurations. High Volt 2:60–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mok YS, Koh DJ, Shin DN, Kim KT (2004) Reduction of nitrogen oxides from simulated exhaust gas by using plasma-catalytic process. Fuel Process Technol 86(3):303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mukherjee DS, Rajanikanth BS (2016) DBD plasma based ozone injection in a biodiesel exhaust and estimation of NOx reduction by dimensional analysis approach. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 23:3267–3274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mukherjee DS, Rajanikanth BS (2019) Prediction of variation of oxides of nitrogen in plasma–based diesel exhaust treatment using artifcial neural network. J Environ Sci Technol, Int. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qiu Z, Ruan J, Huang D, Pu Z, Shu S (2015) A prediction method for breakdown voltage of typical air gaps based on electric field features and support vector machine. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 22:2125–2135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rajanikanth BS, Srinivasan AD, Subhankar DAS (2005) Enhanced performance of discharge plasma in raw engine exhaust treatment-operation under different temperatures and loads. Plasma Sci Technol 7(4):2943–2946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Regression. Gaussian processes for machine learning, vol 2. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 7–32Google Scholar
  23. Roslan NA, Buntat Z, Sidik MAB (2013) Application of dimensional analysis for prediction of NOX removal. In: IEEE 7th international power engineering and optimization conference, Langkawi, Malasiya, pp 218–222Google Scholar
  24. Saavedra HM et al (2007) Modeling and experimental study on nitric oxide treatment using dielectric barrier discharge. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 35:1533–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Samui P, Sitharam TG (2009) Application of least squares support vector machine in seismic attenuation prediction. ISET J Earthq Technol Tech Note 46:147–155Google Scholar
  26. Shabri A, Suhartono (2012) Streamflow forecasting using least-squares support vector machines. Hydrol Sci J 57:1275–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singleton DR et al (2009) Compact pulsed-power system for transient plasma ignition. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 37:2275–2279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stegle O et al (2008) Gaussian process robust regression for noisy heart rate data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:2143–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang Z, Zhang H (2018) Modeling NOx emission of coal-fired boiler with differential evolution optimized least square support vector machine. In: Chinese control decision conference, pp 3364–3367Google Scholar
  30. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang T et al (2012) Effect of reactor structure in DBD for nonthermal plasma processing of NO in N2 at ambient temperature. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 32:1189–1201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical SciencesIndian Institute of Technology BhubaneswarArgul, JatniIndia

Personalised recommendations