Advertisement

Urban noise impact model for Kuwait new railway: impact study

  • S. AlKhederEmail author
  • W. Abdullah
  • F. Al-Rukaibi
  • H. Al Sayegh
Original Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Transportation is responsible for producing high noise levels that negatively affect people’s life causing critical annoyance and sleep disturbance. Although railways are considered one of the most sustainable transport modes, considerable levels of noise are emitted from railways operation that should be controlled. This paper was developed in order to predict the noise effect of a new railway system in Kuwait. The calculation method was based on the national calculation method from the Netherlands. It was applied using the Predictor 5.04 commercial software. The overall emission levels in dB(A) were estimated using the SRM II propagation calculation method in octave bands. The studied areas near the rail line were analyzed from an acoustic point of view. Based on the calculation model, several isophone alternatives for these areas were produced. Finally, the alternatives were compared and classified according to their acoustic quality based on their surface lengths.

Keywords

Acoustic quality Kuwait Noise Prediction Rail 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

References

  1. AlKheder S, AlRukaibi F, Zaqzouq A (2018) Optimal bus frequency for Kuwait public transportation company: a cost view. Sustain Cities Soc 41:312–319Google Scholar
  2. Arana M, García A (1998) A social survey on the effects of environmental noise on the residents of Pamplona, Spain. Appl Acoust 53(4):245–253Google Scholar
  3. Babisch W (2005) Noise and health. Environ Health Perspect 113(1):A14–A15Google Scholar
  4. Botto MA, Sousa JMC, da Costa JS (2005) Intelligent active noise control applied to a laboratory railway coach model. Control Eng Pract 13(4):473–484Google Scholar
  5. Colaço A, Costa PA, Amado-Mendes P, Godinho L (2017) Prediction of vibrations and reradiated noise due to railway traffic: a comprehensive hybrid model based on a finite element method and method of fundamental solutions approach. J Vib Acoust 139(6):061009Google Scholar
  6. De Kluizenaar Y, Gansevoort RT, Miedema HM, de Jong PE (2007) Hypertension and road traffic noise exposure. J Occup Environ Med 49(5):484–492Google Scholar
  7. Eadie DT, Santoro M (2006) Top-of-rail friction control for curve noise mitigation and corrugation rate reduction. J Sound Vib 293(3–5):747–757Google Scholar
  8. Eadie DT, Santoro M, Kalousek J (2005) Railway noise and the effect of top of rail liquid friction modifiers: changes in sound and vibration spectral distributions in curves. Wear 258(7–8):1148–1155Google Scholar
  9. European Commission DG Environment (2003) Adaptation and revision of the interim noise computation methods for the purpose of strategic noise mapping-final report, part A. Project team: Wölfel MeßsystemeGoogle Scholar
  10. European Union (2002) Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union (2002). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32002L0049. Accessed Oct 2018
  11. Fouracre P, Dunkerley C, Gardner G (2003) Mass rapid transit systems for cities in the developing world. Transp Rev 23(3):299–310Google Scholar
  12. Gao F, Xia H, An N (2010) Analysis and experimental study on the radiation noise of the elevated structures of Beijing metro line 5. Zhongguo Tiedao Kexue 31(5):134–139Google Scholar
  13. Jakovljevic B, Paunovic K, Belojevic G (2009) Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environ Int 35(3):552–556Google Scholar
  14. Jarosińska D, Héroux MÈ, Wilkhu P, Creswick J, Verbeek J, Wothge J, Paunović E (2018) Development of the WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: an introduction. Inte J Environ Res Public Health 15(4):813Google Scholar
  15. Ko JH, Chang SI, Kim M, Holt JB, Seong JC (2011) Transportation noise and exposed population of an urban area in the Republic of Korea. Environ Int 37(2):328–334Google Scholar
  16. Kouroussis G, Vogiatzis KE, Connolly DP (2017) A combined numerical/experimental prediction method for urban railway vibration. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:377–386Google Scholar
  17. Li Q, Thompson DJ (2017) Prediction of rail and bridge noise arising from concrete railway viaducts by using a multilayer rail fastener model and a wavenumber domain method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 232:1326–1346Google Scholar
  18. Malmborg J, Persson K, Persson P, Andersen LV (2017) Prediction models of free-field vibrations from railway traffic. In: COMPDYN 2017-6th International conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineeringGoogle Scholar
  19. Münzel T, Sørensen M, Gori T, Schmidt FP, Rao X, Brook J, Chen LC, Brook RD, Rajagopalan S (2017) Environmental stressors and cardio-metabolic disease: part I–epidemiologic evidence supporting a role for noise and air pollution and effects of mitigation strategies. Eur Heart J 38(8):550–556Google Scholar
  20. Murphy E, King EA, Rice HJ (2009) Estimating human exposure to transport noise in central Dublin, Ireland. Environ Int 35(2):298–302Google Scholar
  21. Thompson D (2008) Railway noise and vibration: mechanisms, modelling and means of control. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Kempen EE, Kruize H, Boshuizen HC, Ameling CB, Staatsen BA, de Hollander AE (2002) The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 110(3):307Google Scholar
  23. van Leeuwen H (2003) Noise emission of light-rail vehicles-state of the artGoogle Scholar
  24. van Volkshuisvesting NM (1996) Reken-en Meetvoorschrift RailverkeerslawaaiGoogle Scholar
  25. Vienneau D, Schindler C, Perez L, Probst-Hensch N, Röösli M (2015) The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environ Res 138:372–380Google Scholar
  26. Vogiatzis K (2012) Environmental ground borne noise and vibration protection of sensitive cultural receptors along the Athens Metro Extension to Piraeus. Sci Total Environ 439:230–237Google Scholar
  27. Vogiatzis KE, Kouroussis G (2015) Prediction and efficient control of vibration mitigation using floating slabs: practical application at Athens metro lines 2 and 3. Int J Rail Transp 3(4):215–232Google Scholar
  28. Vogiatzis K, Kouroussis G (2017) Airborne and ground-borne noise and vibration from urban rail transit systems. In: Yaghoubi H (ed) Urban transport systems. In Tech, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. World Health Organization (2018) Environmental noise guidelines for the European regionGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang X, Li X, Ning B, Tang T (2016) A survey on energy-efficient train operation for urban rail transit. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17(1):2–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. AlKheder
    • 1
    Email author
  • W. Abdullah
    • 1
  • F. Al-Rukaibi
    • 1
  • H. Al Sayegh
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering and PetroleumKuwait UniversityKuwaitKuwait
  2. 2.Kuwait United Development Co.Kuwait, DasmanKuwait

Personalised recommendations