Advertisement

Life cycle assessment of a decentralized greywater treatment alternative for non-potable reuse application

  • K. Masmoudi Jabri
  • E. Nolde
  • A. Ciroth
  • L. BousselmiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

The decentralized wastewater treatment systems including collection, treatment, and recycling of treated wastewater are an efficient integrated water management solution to overcome the shortage of freshwater and to reduce pollutant emissions. In this study, life cycle assessment was performed in order to evaluate a decentralized alternative allowing the recycling of treated greywater (TGW) in a multi-family dwelling. The adopted treatment system is the moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). The biological treatment with MBBRs was found the main contributor to the majority of the investigated impact categories. The integration of the tertiary treatment led to an increase in the environmental load ranging between 6 and 30.4% depending on the impact category in comparison with the scenario integrating only the biological treatment. However, the final environmental profile of both scenarios presented a minor difference. Moreover, the recycling of the TGW allowed a reduction ranging between 3.9 and 17% on five impact categories compared to the no recycling scenario. It is concluded that the decentralized approach for greywater treatment and recycling is beneficial for the environment as the distribution system and the tertiary treatment didn’t increase drastically the environmental load of the plant allowing water saving. Moreover, it is recommended to use renewable energy to reduce the environmental impact associated with the energy requirement for the biological treatment which affects the global warming potential and the acidification impact categories and to substitute the polyvinylchloride pipes with polyethylene pipes to reduce emissions related to the human toxicity impact category.

Keywords

Wastewater Process Environmental impact assessment Recycling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was developed in the framework of sandwich thesis between the Technical University of Berlin and the University of Carthage in Tunisia. The authors wish to thank the company Nolde & Partner innovative Wasserkonzepte, Berlin, and particularly Mr. Erwin Nolde for his helpful, technical support and availability for the development of this work. Ms. Khaoula Masmoudi Jabri thanks the financial support from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Tunisia, and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13762_2019_2511_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Conflict of Interest The author declare that they have no conflict of interestReferences

  1. 2030 Water Research group (2009) Charting our water future economic frameworks to inform decision-makingGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdel-Kader AM (2012) Studying the efficiency of grey water treatment by using rotating biological contactors system. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 25:89–95Google Scholar
  3. Amores MJ, Meneses M, Pasqualino J, Antón A, Castells F (2013) Environmental assessment of urban water cycle on Mediterranean conditions by LCA approach. J Clean Prod 43:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bani-Melhem K, Al-Qodah Z, Al-Shannag M, Ahmad Qasaimeh, Rasool Qtaishat M, Alkasrawi M (2015) On the performance of real grey water treatment using a submerged membrane bioreactor system. J Memb Sci 476:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonton A, Bouchard C, Barbeau B, Jedrzejak S (2012) Comparative life cycle assessment of water treatment plants. Desalination 284:42–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatzisymeon E, Foteinis S, Mantzavinos D, Tsoutsos T (2013) Life cycle assessment of advanced oxidation processes for olive mill wastewater treatment. J Clean Prod 54:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Z, Ngo HH, Guo W (2012) A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes. Sci Total Environ 426:13–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dominguez S, Laso J, Margallo M, Aldaco R, Rivero MJ, Irabien Á, Ortiz I (2017) LCA of greywater management within a water circular economy restorative thinking framework. Sci Total Environ 621:1047–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El-Sayed Mohamed Mahgoub M, Van Der Steen NP, Abu-Zeid K, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Towards sustainability in urban water: a life cycle analysis of the urban water system of Alexandria City, Egypt. J Clean Prod 18:1100–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2018) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on minimum requirements for water reuseGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfí M, Cadena E, Sanchez-Ramos D, Ferrer I (2016) Life cycle assessment of drinking water: comparing conventional water treatment, reverse osmosis and mineral water in glass and plastic bottles. J Clean Prod 137:997–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holloway RW, Miller-Robbie L, Patel M et al (2016) Life-cycle assessment of two potable water reuse technologies: MF/RO/UV-AOP treatment and hybrid osmotic membrane bioreactors. J Memb Sci 507:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igos E, Besson M, Navarrete Gutiérrez T, Ana Barbara B, Benetto E, Barna L, Ahmadi A, Spérandio M (2017) Assessment of environmental impacts and operational costs of the implementation of an innovative source-separated urine treatment. Water Res 126:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO 14040 (2006) environmental management-life cycle assessment—principles and framework. European committee for standardizationGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management-life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. European committee for standardizationGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamine M, Bousselmi L, Ghrabi A (2007) Biological treatment of grey water using sequencing batch reactor. Desalination 215:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Luo X, Huang X et al (2013) Life cycle assessment of a municipal wastewater treatment plant: a case study in Suzhou, China. J Clean Prod 57:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lorenzo-Toja Y, Alfonsín C, Amores MJ, Aldea X, Marin D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2016) Beyond the conventional life cycle inventory in wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 553:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Machado AI, Beretta M, Fragoso R, Duarte E (2017) Overview of the state of the art of constructed wetlands for decentralized wastewater management in Brazil. J Environ Manag 187:560–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masi F, Bresciani R, Rizzo A et al (2016) Green walls for greywater treatment and recycling in dense urban areas: a case-study in Pune. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 6:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masmoudi Jabri K (2018) Contribution to the optimization of biological greywater treatment by modeling and life cycle assessment. Dissertation, University of Carthage, TU BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Masmoudi Jabri K, Fiedler T, Saidi A, Nolde E, Ogurek M, Geissen S-U, Bousselmi L (2019) Steady-state modeling of the biodegradation performance of a multistage moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) used for on-site greywater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:19047–19062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meneses M, Pasqualino JC, Castells F (2010) Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: treatment alternatives and applications. Chemosphere 81:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ng BJH, Zhou J, Giannis A, Chang W-C, Wang JY (2014) Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment. J Environ Manag 140:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nolde E (1999) Greywater reuse systems for toilet flushing in multi-storey buildings-over ten years experience in Berlin. Urban Water 1:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pasqualino JC, Meneses M, Castells F (2011) Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater reclamation and reuse alternatives. J Ind Ecol 15:49–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00293.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pintilie L, Torres CM, Teodosiu C, Castells F (2016) Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: an LCA case study. J Clean Prod 139:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Romero-Hernandez O (2005) Applying life cycle tools and process engineering to determine the most adequate treatment process conditions. A tool in environmental policy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saidi A, Masmoudi K, Nolde E, El Amrani B, Amraoui F (2017) Organic matter degradation in a greywater recycling system using a multistage moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Water Sci Technol 76:3328–3339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salgot M (2008) Water reclamation, recycling and reuse: implementation issues. Desalination 218:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanchez M, Rivero MJ, Ortiz I (2010) Photocatalytic oxidation of grey water over titanium dioxide suspensions. Desalination 262:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tangsubkul N, Beavis P, Moore SJ, Lundie S, Waite TD (2005) Life cycle assessment of water recycling technology. Water Resour Manag 19:521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Teodosiu C, Barjoveanu G, Sluser BR et al (2016) Environmental assessment of municipal wastewater discharges: a comparative study of evaluation methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:395–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Theregowda RB, Vidic R, Landis AE, Dzombak DA, Matthews HS (2016) Integrating external costs with life cycle costs of emissions from tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater for reuse in cooling systems. J Clean Prod 112:4733–4740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thibodeau C, Monette F, Glaus M (2014) Comparison of development scenarios of a black water source-separation sanitation system using life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing. Resour Conserv Recycl 92:38–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tong L, Liu X, Liu X, Yuan Z, Zhang Q (2013) Life cycle assessment of water reuse systems in an industrial park. J Environ Manag 129:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tram VOP, Ngo HH, Guo W et al (2014) A mini-review on the impacts of climate change on wastewater reclamation and reuse. Sci Total Environ 494–495:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vlasopoulos N, Memon FA, Butler D, Murphy R (2006) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters. Sci Total Environ 367:58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng S, Chen X, Dong X, Liu Y (2017) Efficiency assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants in China: considering greenhouse gas emissions. Resour Conserv Recycl 120:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Masmoudi Jabri
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • E. Nolde
    • 4
  • A. Ciroth
    • 5
  • L. Bousselmi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Wastewaters and EnvironmentCentre for Water Research and Technologies CERTESolimanTunisia
  2. 2.National Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology INSATUniversity of CarthageTunisTunisia
  3. 3.Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Environmental Process EngineeringFaculty IIIBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Nolde & Partner innovative WasserkonzepteBerlinGermany
  5. 5.GreenDelta GmbHBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations