Advertisement

Synthesis of graphite/PbO2 anode: electrodeposition process modeling for improved landfill leachate treatment using RSM and ANN approach

  • P. Mandal
  • A. K. GuptaEmail author
  • B. K. Dubey
Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the hypothesis that the electrodeposition conditions may have effects on the developed electrode’s oxidation performance, the present study aimed at investigating the effects of a graphite/PbO2 anode preparation conditions (current intensity, Pb(NO3)2 concentration, HNO3 concentration, and temperature) on leachate treatment efficiency. Synthesis conditions were varied to improve the performance of the electrode, and leachate treatment efficiencies were evaluated using anodes prepared at different conditions. The Box–Behnken design was used as an experimental design for achieving the goal. The effect of variables on the system’s outcome was modeled by response surface methodology and artificial neural network. The variation in chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency from 7.81 to 24.58% for 2 h of electrolysis demonstrates significant influences of anode preparation conditions on its performance. The optimum conditions were attained as 0.64 A of current intensity, 0.16 mol L−1 of Pb(NO3)2, 0.16 mol L−1 of HNO3, and 76.98 °C of temperature. The PbO2 electrode developed at optimum conditions yielded 79 ± 1.7% COD removal efficiency of leachate at 8 h. The study results show that electrode synthesis conditions affect the oxidation ability of the electrode, and optimization of the same can significantly improve the treatment performance.

Keywords

Lead dioxide anode Response surface methodology Artificial neural network Electrochemical oxidation Characterization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very much thankful to Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, for providing infrastructural facilities for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) cards of International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database 2017 was used in the study.

Supplementary material

13762_2019_2460_MOESM1_ESM.docx (199 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 199 kb)

References

  1. Abaci S, Pekmez K, Hokelek T, Yildiz A (2000) Investigation of some parameters influencing electrocrystallisation of PbO2. J Power Sources 88:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abaci S, Tamer U, Pekmez K, Yildiz A (2005) Performance of different crystal structures of PbO2 on electrochemical degradation of phenol in aqueous solution. Appl Surf Sci 240:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An H, Li Q, Tao D, Cui H, Xu X, Ding L, Sun L, Zhai J (2011) The synthesis and characterization of Ti/SnO2–Sb2O3/PbO2 electrodes: the influence of morphology caused by different electrochemical deposition time. Appl Surf Sci 258:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anglada A, Urtiaga A, Ortiz I, Mantzavinos D, Diamadopoulos E (2010) Boron-doped diamond anodic treatment of landfill leachate: evaluation of operating variables and formation of oxidation. Water Res 5:828–838Google Scholar
  5. Bashir MJK, Isa MH, Kutty SRM, Awang ZB, Aziz HA, Mohajeri S, Farooqi IH (2009) Landfill leachate treatment by electrochemical oxidation. Waste Manage 29:2534–2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicelli LP, Bozzini B, Mele C, D’Urzo L (2008) A review of nanostructural aspects of metal electrodeposition. Int J Electrochem Sci 3:356–408Google Scholar
  7. Campbell SA, Peter LM (1988) A study of the effect of deposition current density on the structure of electrodeposited α-PbO2. Electrochim Acta 34:943–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Candioti LV, De Zan MM, Cámara MS, Goicoechea HC (2014) Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. Talanta 124:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr JP, Hampson NA (1972) The lead dioxide electrode. Chem Rev 72:679–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiang LC, Chang JE, Wen TC (1995) Electrochemical treatability of refractory pollutants in landfill leachate. Hazard Waste Hazard Mater 12(1):71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiang LC, Chang JE, Chung CT (2001) Electrochemical oxidation combined with physical-chemical pretreatment processes for the treatment of refractory landfill leachate. Environ Eng Sci 18(6):369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dai Q, Xia Y, Chen J (2016) Mechanism of enhanced electrochemical degradation of highly concentrated aspirin wastewater using a rare earth La–Y co-doped PbO2 electrode. Electrochim Acta 188:871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duan Y, Wen Q, Chen Y, Duan T, Zhou Y (2014) Preparation and characterization of TiN-doped Ti/SnO2–Sb electrode by dip coating for orange II decolorization. Appl Surf Sci 320:746–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duan X, Zhao C, Liu W, Zhao X, Chang L (2017) Fabrication of a novel PbO2 electrode with a graphene nanosheet interlayer for electrochemical oxidation of 2-chlorophenol. Electrochim Acta 240:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandes A, Pacheco MJ, Ciríaco L, Lopes A (2015) Review on the electrochemical processes for the treatment of sanitary landfill leachates: present and future. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 176–177:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garson GD (1991) Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI Expert 6:47–51Google Scholar
  17. Ghasemi S, Fazllolah M, Shamsipur M (2007) Electrochemical deposition of lead dioxide in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone A morphological study. Electrochim Acta 53:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamdy A, Mostafa MK, Nasr M (2019) Regression analysis and artificial intelligence for removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions using nanoscale zero-valent iron. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holzwarth U, Gibson N (2011) The Scherrer equation versus the ‘Debye–Scherrer equation’. Nat Nanotechnol 6:534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ihara I, Kanamura K, Shimada E, Watanabe T (2004) High gradient magnetic separation combined with electrocoagulation and electrochemical oxidation for the treatment of landfill leachate. IEEE Trans Appl Superconduct 14(2):1558–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kapoor A, Yang RT (1989) Correlation of equilibrium adsorption data of condensible vapours on porous adsorbents. Gas Sep Purif 3:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karri RR, Tanzifi M, Yaraki MT, Sahu JN (2018) Optimization and modeling of methyl orange adsorption onto polyaniline nano-adsorbent through response surface methodology and differential evolution embedded neural network. J Environ Manage 223:517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kundu P, Paul V, Kumar V, Mishra IM (2015) Formulation development, modeling and optimization of emulsification process using evolving RSM coupled hybrid ANN-GA framework. Chem Eng Res Des 4:773–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leitner V, Malucelli LC, Pincerati MR, Maranho LT (2019) Rhizospheric bacteria with potential to degrade landfill leachate. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1581–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Pletcher D, Walsh FC (2009) A novel flow battery: a lead acid battery based on an electrolyte with soluble lead(II) Part VII. Further studies of the lead dioxide positive electrode. Electrochim Acta 54:4688–4695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li J, Yang Z, Xu H, Song P, Huang J, Xu R, Zhang Y, Zhou Y (2016) Electrochemical treatment of mature landfill leachate using Ti/RuO2–IrO2 and Al electrode: optimization and mechanism. RSC Adv. 6:47509–47519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li X, Xu H, Yan W (2017) Effects of twelve sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on electro-catalytic performance and stability of PbO2 electrode. J Alloy Compd 718:386–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Low CTJ, Pletcher D, Walsh FC (2009) The electrodeposition of highly reflective lead dioxide coatings. Electrochem Commun 11:1301–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandal P, Dubey BK, Gupta AK (2017) Review on landfill leachate treatment by electrochemical oxidation: drawbacks, challenges and future scope. Waste Manage 69:250–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandal P, Gupta AK, Dubey BK (2018) A novel approach towards multivariate optimization of graphite/PbO2 anode synthesis conditions: insight into its enhanced oxidation ability and physicochemical characteristics. J Environ Chem Eng 6:4438–4451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montgomery DC (2013) Design and analysis of experiments, 8th edn. Wiley, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukherjee DS, Rajanikanth BS (2019) Prediction of variation of oxides of nitrogen in plasma-based diesel exhaust treatment using artificial neural network. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02242-5 Google Scholar
  33. Munichandraiah N (1992) Physicochemical properties of electrodeposited β-lead dioxide: effect of deposition current density. J Appl Electrochem 22:825–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Panizza M, Delucchi M, Sirés I (2010) Electrochemical process for the treatment of landfill leachate. J Appl Electrochem 40(10):1721–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F, Moulin P (2008) Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater 150(3):468–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saravanathamizhan R, Vardhan KH, Prakash DG (2015) RSM and ANN modeling for electro-oxidation of simulated wastewater using CSTER. Desalin Water Treat 3994:1–8Google Scholar
  37. Scherrer P (1918) Bestimmung der Grosse und der Inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen Mittels Rontgenstrahlen, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen. Math Phys Klasse 2:98–100Google Scholar
  38. Shen KP, Wei LX (2003) Morphologic study of electrochemically formed lead dioxide. Electrochim Acta 48:1743–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silveira JE, Zazo JA, Pliego G, Bidóia ED, Moraes PB (2015) Electrochemical oxidation of landfill leachate in a flow reactor: optimization using response surface methodology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:5831–5841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silveira JE, Claro EMT, Paz WS, Oliveira AS, Zazo JA, Casas JA (2018) Optimization of disperse blue 3 mineralization by UV-LED/FeTiO3 activated persulfate using response surface methodology. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 85:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sirés I, Low CTJ, Ponce-de-León C, Walsh FC (2010) The characterisation of PbO2-coated electrodes prepared from aqueous methanesulfonic acid under controlled deposition conditions. Electrochim Acta 55:2163–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sizirici B, Yildiz I (2017) Adsorption capacity of iron oxide-coated gravel for landfill leachate: simultaneous study. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thanos JCG, Wabner DW (1985) Structural changes of the texture of β-lead dioxide-titanium anodes during the oxygen/ozone electrosynthesis in neutral and acidic electrolytes. J Electroanal Chem 182:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Velichenko AB, Amadelli R, Benedetti A, Girenko DV, Kovalyov SV, Danilov FI (2002) Electrosynthesis and physicochemical properties of PbO2 films. J Electrochem Soc 149:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Velichenko AB, Amadelli R, Gruzdeva EV, Luk’yanenko TV, Danilov FI (2009) Electrodeposition of lead dioxide from methanesulfonate solutions. J Power Sources 191:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Viana DF, Salazar-banda GR, Leite MS (2018) Electrochemical degradation of reactive black 5 with surface response and artificial neural networks optimization models. Sep Sci Technol 53(16):2647–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu M, Mao Y, Song W, Ouyang X, Hu Y, Wei Y (2018) Preparation and characterization of Fe–Ce co-doped Ti/TiO2 NTs/PbO2 nanocomposite electrodes for efficient electrocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J Electroanal Chem 823:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xue J, Yu L, Li G (2017) Influence of molecular structure of imidazolium based ionic liquids on the electrochemical oxidation performances of resulting PbO2 deposits. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:4795–4810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yeh CJ, Lo SL, Kuo J, Chou YC (2018) Optimization of landfill leachate treatment by microwave oxidation using the Taguchi method. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:2075–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang H, Li Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, Zhang D (2010) Application of response surface methodology to the treatment landfill leachate in a three-dimensional electrochemical reactor. Waste Manage 30:2096–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang H, Ran X, Wu X, Zhang D (2011) Evaluation of electro-oxidation of biologically treated landfill leachate using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 188:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao W, Xing J, Chen D, Jin D, Shen J (2016) Electrochemical degradation of Musk ketone in aqueous solutions using a novel porous Ti/SnO2–Sb2O3/PbO2 electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 775:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Engineering Division, Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations