Advertisement

Radiation hazards of the moassel consumed in Baghdad/Iraq using NaI(Tl) gamma spectroscopy

  • N. F. KadhimEmail author
  • A. A. Ridha
Original Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Smoking narghile has become a common occurrence among young Iraqi people since several years ago, moassel is the name given to the tobacco dentifrice smoked by Iraqi people, and it consists of tobacco, honey, glycerin and flavors. Tobacco which is the main component of the moassel has a little amount of some radioisotopes, but nevertheless few studies have addressed the radioactivity and the potential risks in moassel. Samples of the most common moassel types consumed in Iraq are collected from the markets, using gamma spectroscopy NaI(Tl), three natural radionuclides 40K, 214Bi and 208Tl are investigated in the studied samples. The results show that the mean radium equivalent is 10.272 Bq/kg, the mean gamma-absorbed dose is 4.089 nGy/h, the mean annual effective dose is0.051  mSv/y, the mean external hazard index is 0.026, the mean internal hazard index is 0.035, the mean gamma index is 0.034, the mean alpha index is 0.017, and the annual gonadal dose equivalent is 0.031 mSv/y. A question near is done in this work to investigate the annual smoked mass of the moassel by capita to compute some of the transaction. The results show that the total daily inhalation is 3.027 mSv/y, the total annual effective dose is 0.002 × 10−6 mSv/y, and the total excessive lifetime cancer risk is 0.00501 mSv/y. The study concludes that all results are below than the recommended limits given by (UNSCEAR 2000).

Keywords

Activity concentration NaI(Tl)spectroscopy Narghile Radiometric Parameters Tobacco 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Department of Physics, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University for their support and helping in finishing the manuscript.

References

  1. Abd El-Aziza N, Khater AEM, Al-Sewaidan HA (2005) Natural radioactivity contents in tobacco. Int Congr Ser 1276:407–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2004.11.166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam K Mc et al (2017) Comprehensive survey of radionuclides in contemporary smokeless tobacco products. Chem Cent J 11(1):1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-017-0359-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akhtar N, Tufail M, Ashraf M (2005) Natural environmental radioactivity and estimation of radiation exposure from saline soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1(4):279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akinyose FC et al (2017) Radiological impacts of natural radioactivity in locally produced tobacco products in Oyo State, Nigeria. J Phys Chem Biophys 8:1.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0398.1000262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akkurt I, Uyanik NA, Gunoglu K (2015) Radiation dose estimation: an in vitro measurement for Isparta-Turkey. Int J Comput Exp Sci Eng 1(1):1–4.  https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.194376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alharbi WR, AlZahrani JH, Abbady AGE (2011) Assessment of radiation hazard indices from granite rocks of the southeastern Arabian Shield, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5(6):672–682Google Scholar
  7. Alsalihi RA, Alsalihi AA (2018) Radiation dosimetry of some rice types consumed in Basrah governorate/Iraq by using thermoluminescence technique. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2176-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Zahrani JH (2017) Estimation of natural radioactivity in local and imported polished granite used as building materials in Saudi Arabia. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 10(3):241–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2017.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ammer HA et al (2017) Hazard indices and age group parameters of powder milk consumed in Iraq. High Educ Res 2(5):117–122.  https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20170205.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Amr M et al (2014) Elemental characterization of shisha moassel smoking mixtures using ICP-MS and comparison with other tobacco products. Wulfenia J 21(2):428–449Google Scholar
  11. Aricgil M, Arbag H (2018) Hookah smoking impairs nasal mucociliary clearance. Tob Induc Dis.  https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/85067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Asaduzzaman K et al (2015) Uptake and distribution of natural radioactivity in rice from soil in north and west part of peninsular Malaysia for the estimation of ingestion dose to man. Ann Nucl Energy 76:85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.09.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bello S, Muhammad BG, Bature B (2017) Total excess lifetime cancer risk estimation from enhanced heavy metals concentrations resulting from tailings in Katsina steel rolling mill, Nigeria. J Mater Sci Eng 6(3):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0022.1000338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys 48(1):87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Changizi V et al (2013) Measurement of 226Ra, 232Th, 137Cs 40 K, and activities of wheat and corn products in Ilam province—Iran and resultant annual ingestion radiation dose. Iran J Public Health 42(8):903–914Google Scholar
  16. Chaouachi K (2009) Hookah (Shisha, Narghile) smoking and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). A critical review of the relevant literature and the public health consequences. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(2):798–843.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6020798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durazzo T et al (2014) Smoking and increased Alzheimer’s disease risk: a review of potential mechanisms. Alzheimer’s Dement 10(3 Suppl):122–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehsanpour E et al (2014) 226Ra, 232Th and 40K contents in water samples in part of central deserts in Iran and their potential radiological risk to human population. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fadhil N, Abdulmajeed IM, Farhan N (2010) Determination of Radon and Thoron concentration in different kinds of local and imported tobacco samples. In: Atti Della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi Fondata Da Ronchi, vol 2, pp 433–437Google Scholar
  20. Farhan N (2009) Studying the natural radioactivity in some tobacco cigarettes imported to Iraq from unknown origins. Jordan Med J 43(2):83–90Google Scholar
  21. Faweya EB et al (2017) Estimation of radiation exposure in soils and organic (animal) and inorganic (chemical) fertilizers using active technique. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1574-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hashim AK, Fuliful FK (2017) Lung cancer risk due to radon in different brand cigarette in Iraqi market. Asian J Appl Sci 5(3):541–549Google Scholar
  23. Hashim AK et al (2015) A Study of radon concentration in different brands tobacco cigarette in Iraqi market, influencing factors and lung cancer risk. Int J Sci Technol 5(10):1–9Google Scholar
  24. Hayumbu P, Zaman MB, Lubaba NCH (1995) Natural radioactivity in Zambian building materials collected from Lusaka. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 199(3):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holtzman RB, Ilcewicz FH (1966) Lead-210 and polonium-210 in tissues of cigarette smokers. Science 153(3741):1259–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jibiri NN, Isinkaye MO, Bello IA, Olaniyi PG (2016) Dose assessments from the measured radioactivity in soil, rock, clay, sediment and food crop samples of an elevated radiation area in south-western Nigeria. Environ Earth Sci 75:107–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4819-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kant K et al (2015) Natural radioactivity in Indian vegetation samples. Iran J Radiat Res 13(2):143–150Google Scholar
  28. Khater AEM (2004) Polonium-210 budget in cigarettes. J Environ Radioact 71(1):33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00118-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khater AEM et al (2008) Radiological hazards of Narghile (hookah, shisha, goza) smoking: activity concentrations and dose assessment. J Environ Radioact 99(12):1808–1814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehdi SA et al (2016) Assessment of annual effective dose from measured soil radioactivity levels using HPGe detector. Univ J Eng Sci 4(4):79–83.  https://doi.org/10.13189/ujes.2016.040403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Papastefanou C (2009) Radioactivity of tobacco leaves and radiation dose induced from smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(2):558–567.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6020558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ridha AA, Hasan HA (2017) Lung cancer risks due to the radon in cigarette tobacco. Radiochemistry 59(2):208–214.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s1066362217020163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabbar AN, Naeem HS (2016) Measurement of radon concentration in hookah flavor. Int J Sci Eng Technol 5(5):272–274.  https://doi.org/10.17950/ijset/v5s5/512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sajid KM, Chaouachi K, Mahmood R (2008) Hookah smoking and cancer: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in exclusive/ever hookah smokers. Harm Reduct J 5(19):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-5-19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savidou A, Kehagia K, Eleftheriadis K (2006) Concentration levels of 210Pb and 210Po in dry tobacco leaves in Greece. J Environ Radioact 85(1):94–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh J et al (2017) Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and associated dose rates in soil samples from historical city Panipat, India. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 10(3):283–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2017.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skwarzec B et al (2001) Inhalation of 210Po and 210Pb from cigarette smoking in Poland. J Environ Radioact 57:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, vol 1. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. World Health Organization (2005) WHO study group on tobacco product regulation, advisory note on water pipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators. WHO document prediction services, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Yehuwdah ECU, Inimbom JU (2017) A gamma spectrometric analysis and radium equivalent activity index of water in ABAK, Nigeria: a baseline survey. J Environ Earth Scie 7(5):19–26Google Scholar
  41. Zagà V et al (2011) Polonium and lung cancer. J Oncol 2011:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/860103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, College of ScienceMustansiriyah UniversityBaghdadIraq

Personalised recommendations