Advertisement

Water distribution network failure analysis under uncertainty

  • P. Aghapoor Khameneh
  • S. M. Miri LavasaniEmail author
  • R. Nabizadeh Nodehi
  • R. Arjmandi
Original Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Failure analysis of water distribution network gains prime importance as it plays a crucial role in meeting the increasing demand for water in megacities. Water interruption can occur due to instances of component failure such as in pipes and valves. Water distribution network is a complex system comprising a variety of components and their interrelations. To avoid sub-optimization, a comprehensive framework for failure analysis is needed, in order to include all parts of water distribution network. The primary aim of the study was to propose a framework for failure analysis in which fuzzy set theory was combined with fault tree analysis as a useful model to deal with uncertainties resulting from unavailability of data. The proposed framework was applied to a water distribution network in Tehran to demonstrate its validity. Water supply interruption was considered a top event in the fault tree. As a result, the occurrence probability of top event was 0.29. According to sensitivity results, isolation valve failure was the critical minimal cut set with the value of 0.16, which shows a 55% decrease in top event probability. Thus, it is concluded that in decision-making process, a focus should be maintained on the critical minimal cut set, while suggesting corrective actions.

Keywords

Critical minimal cut set Fuzzy fault tree analysis Water interruption Water supply system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Tehran Province Water and Wastewater Company (TPWWC) for providing valuable information and data to perform the case study. We also are grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agathokleous A, Christodoulou S (2016) An expanded methodology for imprinting the condition of an urban water distribution network. Procedia Eng 162:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghaarabi E, Aminravan F, Sadiq R, Hoofar M, Rodriguez MJ, Najjara H (2014) Comparative study of fuzzy evidential reasoning and fuzzy rule-based approaches: an illustration for water quality assessment in distribution networks. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:655–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berardi L, Ugarelli R, Rostum J, Giustolisi O (2014) Assessing mechanical vulnerability in water distribution networks under multiple failures. Water Resour Res 50:2586–2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boryczko K, Cieslak BT (2014) Analysis of risk failure in water main pipe network and of delivering poor quality water. Environ Prot Eng 40. http://epe.pwr.wroc.pl/2014/4-2014/Boryczko_4-2014
  5. Cai B, Liu H, Xie M (2016) A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 80:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheliyan AS, Bhattacharyya SK (2018) Fuzzy fault tree analysis of oil and gas leakage in subsea production systems. J Ocean Eng Sci 3:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, 1st edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diao K, Sweetapple C, Farmani R, Fu G, Ward S, Butler D (2016) Global resilience analysis of water distribution systems. Water Res 106:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong HY, Yu DU (2005) Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(4):83–88Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2008) Identification and description of hazards for water supply systems. TECHNEAU web. https://www.techneau.org/fileadmin/files/Publications/Publications/Deliverables/D4.1.4.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018
  11. Fusco F, Arandia E (2017) State estimation for water distribution networks in the presence of control devices with switching behavior. Procedia Eng 186:592–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gamboa-medina MM, Reis LFR (2016) Sampling design for leak detection in water distribution networks. Procedia Eng 186:460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haghighi A, Keramat A (2012) A fuzzy approach for considering uncertainty in transient analysis of pipe networks. J Hydroinformatics 14:1024–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsu HM, Chen TC (1994) Aggregation of fuzzy opinion under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(1):279–285Google Scholar
  15. Jensen HA, Jerez DJ (2018) A stochastic framework for reliability and sensitivity analysis of large scale water distribution networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 176:80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jose N, Sumam KS (2016) Optimal water distribution network design accounting for valve closure. Procedia Technol 24:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jun H, Loganathan GV, Kim JH, Park S (2008) Identifying pipes and valves of high importance for efficient operation and maintenance of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 22:719–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kabir G, Demissie G, Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2015a) Integrating failure prediction models for water mains: Bayesian belief network based data fusion. Knowl Based Syst 85:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Francisque A, Sadiq R (2015b) Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model. Eur J Oper Res 240:220–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kabir G, Tesfamarian S, Loeppky J, Sadiq R (2015c) Integrating Bayesian linear regression with ordered weighted averaging: uncertainty analysis for predicting water main failures. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst 1(3):04015007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2016a) Bayesian model averaging for the prediction of water main failure for small to large Canadian municipalities. Can J Civ Eng 43:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2016b) Predicting water main failures: a Bayesian model updating approach. Knowl Based Syst 110:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapelan Z, Savic D, Mahmoud H (2017) A response methodology for reducing impacts of failure events in water distribution networks. Procedia Eng 186:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li R, Zou Z, An Y (2016a) Water quality assessment in Qu river based on fuzzy water pollution index method. J Environ Sci 50:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Chen G, Zhu H (2016b) Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot 103:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin TC, Wang MJ (1997) Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58(6):205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindhe A, Rosen L, Norberg T, Bergstedt O, Petterson Thomas JR (2011) Cost-effectiveness analysis of risk-reduction measures to reach water safety targets. Water Res 45:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu H, Walski T, Fu G, Zhang C (2017) Failure impact analysis of isolation valves in a water distribution network. J Water Resources Plan Manag 143:04017019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miri Lavasani MR, Wang J, Yang Z, Finlay J (2011) Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis on oil and gas offshore pipelines. Int J Mar Sci Eng 1(1):29–42Google Scholar
  30. Ocampo-Duque W, Ferre-Huguet N, Domingo JL, Schuhmacher M (2006) Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study. Environ Int 32(6):733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Onisawa T (1988) An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 27(2):87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Onisawa T, Nishiwaki Y (1988) Fuzzy human reliability on the CHERNOBYL accident. Fuzzy Sets Syst 28(7):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orojloo M, Shahdany SMH, Roozbahani A (2018) Developing an integrated risk management framework for agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems within fuzzy decision making approaches. Sci Total Environ 627:1363–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan N, Wang H (2007) Assessing failure of bridge construction using fuzzy fault tree analysis. In: 4th international conference on fuzzy system and knowledge discovery, vol 1(2), pp 96–100Google Scholar
  35. Shafiqul Islam M, Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Najjaran H, Francisque A, Hoorfar M (2014) Water distribution system failure: a framework for forensic analysis. Environ Syst Decis 34:168–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Silvert W (2000) Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecol Model 130(1–3):111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stamatelatos M, Vesely W, Dugan J, Fragola J, Minarick J, Railsback J (2002) Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. NASA office of Safety and Mission Assurance. NASA Headquarters. Washington, DC, p 20546. https://elibrary.gsfc.nasa.gov/_assets/doclibBidder/tech_docs/25.%20NASA_Fault_Tree_Handbook_with_Aerospace_Applications%20-%20Copy.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2018
  38. Sugeno M (1999) Fuzzy modelling and control, 1st edn. CRC Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  39. Takdastan A, Mirzabeygi M, Yousefi M, Abbasnia A, Khodadadia R, Soleimani H, Mahvi AH, Naghan DJ (2018) Neuro-fuzzy inference system Prediction of stability indices and sodium absorption ratio in Lordegan rural drinking water resources in west Iran. Data Brief 18:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tanaka H, Fan L, Lai S, Toguchi K (1983) Fault tree analysis by fuzzy probability. IEEE Trans Reliab 32(4):453–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R, Najjaran H (2010) Decision making under uncertainty-an example for seismic risk management. Risk Anal 30(1):78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. TPWW (2018) Tehran Province Water & Wastewater Co. Web. http://www.tpww.ir/en/aboutus. Accessed 15 June 2018
  43. Urbanik PK (2015) Failure analysis and assessment on the exemplary water supply network. Eng Fail Anal 57:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang W, Shen K, Wang B, Dong C, Khan F, Wang Q (2017) Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:678–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber P, Medina-Oliva G, Simon C, Lung B (2012) Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(4):671–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Aghapoor Khameneh
    • 1
  • S. M. Miri Lavasani
    • 2
    Email author
  • R. Nabizadeh Nodehi
    • 3
  • R. Arjmandi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of HSE Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations