Advertisement

Comparison between conventional and modified microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation

  • A. H. AliEmail author
  • H. A. Al-Mussawy
  • M. J. Hussein
  • N. J. Hamadi
Original Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The present study aims to design conventional and modified microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation expressed as voltage. Series of experiments were conducted to evaluate capability of conventional and modified MFC for treating wastewater, and six parameters were measured. The results showed that modified MFC had maximum removal efficiencies for NO3 (58.89%), PO4 (74.98%), COD (91.74%), TSS (98.16%), Pb (91.39%) and Cu (92.78%), while conventional MFC removal efficiency found to be 51.865, 66.03, 85.267, 83.22, 58.91 and 61.66% for these parameters, respectively. Maximum voltage obtained in both conventional and modified MFC at optimum conditions was found 998 mV.

Keywords

Granular activated carbon Nutrients Heavy metals Microbial fuel cell Municipal wastewater 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mustansiriyah University (www.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq), Bagdad,Iraq, for its support in the present work.

References

  1. Aelterman P, Rabaey K, Clauwaert P, Verstraete W (2006) Microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 54:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali AH (2013) Comparative study on removal of cadmium(II) from simulated wastewater by adsorption onto GAC, DB, and PR. Desalin Water Treat 51:5547–5558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali AH, Abdul Razaq Z, Tlaiaa Y, Khishala AD (2016) Methane biogas production from mixing of algae and municipal solid waste by anaerobic digestion. Int J Environ Res 10:613–624Google Scholar
  4. Al-Othman ZA, Ali R, Mu N (2012) Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous medium by activated carbon prepared from peanut shell: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng J 184:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. APHA (1998) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Argun H, Kargi F (2009) Effects of sludge pre-treatment method on biohydrogen production by dark fermentation of waste ground wheat. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:8543–8548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dena ZK, El-Khatib KM, Helmy MH (2017) Microbial diversity structure in acetate single chamber microbial fuel cell for electricity generation. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 15:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng Y, He W, Liu J, Wang X, Qu Y (2014) A horizontal plug flow and stackable pilot microbial fuel cell for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 156:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghoreyshi AA, Jafary T, Najafpour GD, Haghparast F (2011) Effect of type and concentration of substrate on power generation in a dual chambered microbial fuel cell. World Renew Energy Congr 57:1174–1181Google Scholar
  10. Hussein MJ (2017) Using of microbial fuel cell (MFC) for electricity generation and municipal wastewater treatment. M.Sc. thesis, University of Mustansiriyah, IraqGoogle Scholar
  11. Ichihashi O, Hirooka K (2012) Removal and recovery of phosphorus as struvite from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 114:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IRPWS (2001) Iraqi regulation for the preservation of water sources. Ministry of Environmental. http://www.moen.gov.iq. Accessed 6 May 2017
  13. Kim IS, Chae KJ, Choi MJ, Verstraete W (2008) Microbial fuel cells: recent advances, bacterial communities and application beyond electricity generation. Environ Eng Res 13:51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim KY, Yang W, Logan BE (2015) Impact of electrode configurations on retention time and domestic wastewater treatment efficiency using microbial fuel cells. Water Res 80:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leton TG, Yusuf M, Akatah BM (2016) Utilization of multistage microbial fuel cell for septic wastewater treatment. J Mech Civ Eng 13:80–86Google Scholar
  16. Logan BE (2008) Microbial fuel cells. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahendra BG, Shridhar M (2013) Treatment of wastewater and electricity generation using microbial fuel cell technology. Int J Res Eng Technol 1:277–282Google Scholar
  18. Mansoorian HJ, Mahvi AH, Jafari AJ, Amin MM, Rajabizadeh A (2013) Bioelectricity generation using two chamber microbial fuel cell treating wastewater from food processing. Enzyme Microb Technol 52:352–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merawi IA (2015) Using of water hyacinth plant for wastewater treatment, energy production and composting materials. M.Sc. thesis, University of Mustansiriyah, IraqGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohan SV, Mohanakrishna G, Velvizhi V, Sarma PN (2010) Bio-catalyzed electrochemical treatment of real field dairy wastewater with simultaneous power generation. Biochem Eng J 51:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Momoh O, Yusuf L, Naeyor B (2010) A novel electron acceptor for microbial fuel cells: nature of circuit connection on internal resistance. J Biochem Technol 2:216–220Google Scholar
  22. Nimje VR, Chen C, Chen H, Huang YM, Chang Y (2012) Comparative bioelectricity production from various wastewaters in microbial fuel cells using mixed cultures and a pure strain of Shewanella oneidensis. Bioresour Technol 104:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park DH, Zeikus JG (2003) Improved fuel cell and electrode designs for producing electricity from microbial degradation. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rabaey K, Verstraete W (2005) Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol 23:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rabaey K, Boon N, Hofte M, Verstraete W (2005) Microbial phenazine production enhances electron transfer in biofuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 39:3401–3408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sciarria TP, Mecheri B, Merlino G, Barbato M, Garavaglia V (2013) Using olive mill wastewater to improve performance in producing electricity from domestic wastewater by using single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 147:246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seviour RJ, Mino T, Onuki M (2003) The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vullo DL, Ceretti HM, Daniel MA, Ramírez SAM, Zalts A (2008) Cadmium, zinc and copper biosorption mediated by Pseudomonas veronii 2E. Bioresour Technol 99:5574–5581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei Y, Borger AR, Eikelboom DH, Fan Y (2003) Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 37:4453–4467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yavaria Z, Izanloo H, Naddafi K, Khazaeia M (2013) Performance of microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation. Int J Renew Energy Dev 2:131–135Google Scholar
  31. Zhuang L, Zheng Y, Zhou S, Yuan H, Chen Y (2012) Scalable microbial fuel cell (MFC) stack for continuous real wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 106:82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. Ali
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. A. Al-Mussawy
    • 2
  • M. J. Hussein
    • 1
  • N. J. Hamadi
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Engineering, Environmental Engineering DepartmentMustansiriyah UniversityBaghdadIraq
  2. 2.College of Engineering, Water Resources Engineering DepartmentMustansiriyah UniversityBaghdadIraq
  3. 3.College of Engineering, Environmental Engineering DepartmentBaghdad UniversityBaghdadIraq

Personalised recommendations